Clustering of gene ontology terms in genomes

Gene

Volumn 550, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 155-164

  Tiirikka, Timo ^a,b   Siermala, Markku ^a,d   Vihinen, Mauno ^a,c  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c Lund University ^*  (Sweden)

^d Logica Oy   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Genomics; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI K 12; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MUS MUSCULUS; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SERIAL ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOME MAP; GENETICS; GENOME; MOUSE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI K12; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENOME; HUMANS; MICE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84921692518     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.06.060     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adams M.D., et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2000, 287:2185-2195.
2. Alexa A., Rahnenführer J., Lengauer T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1600-1607.
3. Al-Shahrour F., Minguez P., Marqués-Bonet T., Gazave E., Navarro A., Dopazo J. Selection upon genome architecture: conservation of functional neighborhoods with changing genes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 7:6(10). (Oct).
4. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
5. Ashburner M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:25-29.
6. Blattner F.R., et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 1997, 277:1453-1474.
7. Blumenthal T., et al. A global analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans operons. Nature 2002, 417:851-854.
8. Boutanaev A.M., Kalmykova A.I., Shevelyov Y.Y., Nurminsky D.I. Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. Nature 2002, 420:666-669.
9. Caron H., et al. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 2001, 291:1289-1292.
10. Castresana J., Guigo R., Alba M.M. Clustering of genes coding for DNA binding proteins in a region of atypical evolution of the human genome. J. Mol. Evol. 2004, 59:72-79.
11. Cho R.J., et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell 1998, 2:65-73.
12. Cohen B.A., Mitra R.D., Hughes J.D., Church G.M. A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 2000, 26:183-186.
13. Consortium, I.H.G.S. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004, 431:931-945.
14. Consortium, T.C.e.S Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 1998, 282:2012-2018.
15. de Koning D.J., Visscher P.M., Knott S., Haley C.S. A strategy for detection of QTL in half-sib populations. Anim. Sci. 1998, 67:257-268.
16. Dewey F.E., Perez M.V., Wheeler M.T., Watt C., Spin J., Langfelder P., Horvath S., Hannenhalli S., Cappola T.P., Ashley E.A. Gene coexpression network topology of cardiac development, hypertrophy, and failure. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2010, 4:26-35.
17. Elizondo L.I., Jafar-Nejad P., Clewing J.M., Boerkoel C.F. Gene clusters, molecular evolution and disease: a speculation. Curr. Genomics 2009, 10:64-75.
18. Fang G., Rocha E.P.C., Danchin A. Persistence drives gene clustering in bacterial genomes. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:4.
19. Fukuoka Y., Inaoka H., Kohane I.S. Inter-species differences of co-expression of neighboring genes in eukaryotic genomes. BMC Genomics 2004, 5:4.
20. Glusman G., Yanai I., Rubin I., Lancet D. The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res. 2001, 11:685-702.
21. Goffeau A., et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996, 274(546):563-547.
22. Halbleib J.M., Nelson W.J. Cadherins in development: cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:3199-3214.
23. Horton R., et al. Gene map of the extended human MHC. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:889-899.
24. Hurst L., Pal C., Lercher M.J. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:299-310.
25. Kano M., Nishimura K., Ishikawa S., Tsutsumi S., Hirota K., Hirose M., Aburatani H. Expression imbalance map: a new visualization method for detection of mRNA expression imbalance regions. Physiol. Genomics 2003, 13:31-46.
26. Kosak S.T., Groudine M. Gene order and dynamic domains. Science 2004, 306:644-647.
27. Kumánovics A., Takada T., Lindahl K.F. Genomic organization of the mammalian MHC. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 21:629-657.
28. Lawrence J.G., Roth J.R. Selfish operons: horizontal transfer may drive the evolution of gene clusters. Genetics 1996, 143:1843-1860. (Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA. lawrence@biology.utah.edu).
29. Lee J.M., Sonnhammer E.L. Genomic gene clustering analysis of pathways in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 2003, 13:875-882.
30. Lercher M.J., Urrutia A.O., Hurst L.D. Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2002, 31:180-183.
31. Malnic B., Godfrey P.A., Buck L.B. The human olfactory receptor gene family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 8:2584-2589.
32. MHC sequencing consortium Complete sequence and gene map of a human major histocompatibility complex. The MHC sequencing consortium. Nature 1999, 401:921-923.
33. Michalak P. Coexpression, coregulation, and cofunctionality of neighboring genes in eukaryotic genomes. Genomics 2008, 3:243-248.
34. Morison I.M., Ramsay J.P., Spencer H.G. A census of mammalian imprinting. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:457-465.
35. Nie H., Crooijmans R.P., Bastiaansen J.W., Megens H.J., Groenen M.A. Regional regulation of transcription in the chicken genome. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:28.
36. Niimura Y., Nei M. Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:12235-12240.
37. Osbourn A.E., Field B. Operons. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66:3755-3775.
38. Price M.N., Huang K.H., Arkin A.P., Alm E.J. Operon formation is driven by co-regulation and not by horizontal gene transfer. Genome Res. 2005, 15:809-819.
39. Raghupathy N., Durand D. Gene cluster statistics with gene families. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 5:957-968.
40. Reams A.B., Neidle E.L. Gene amplification involves site-specific short homology-independent illegitimate recombination in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338:643-656.
41. Rocha E.P., Danchin A. Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:6570-6577.
42. Roy P.J., Stuart J.M., Lund J., Kim S.K. Chromosomal clustering of muscle-expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2002, 418:975-979.
43. Šidàk Z. Rectangular confidence region for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1967, 62:626-633.
44. Singer G.A., Lloyd A.T., Huminiecki L.B., Wolfe K.H. Clusters of co-expressed genes in mammalian genomes are conserved by natural selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 3:767-775.
45. Sinha A.U., Meller J. Cinteny: flexible analysis and visualization of synteny and genome rearrangements in multiple organisms. BMC Bioinforma. 2007, 8:82.
46. Spellman P.T., Rubin G.M. Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. J. Biol. 2002, 1:5.
47. Stanley S.M., Bailey T.L., Mattick J.S. GONOME: measuring correlations between GO terms and genomic positions. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7:94.
48. The InterPro database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/.
49. Tsai H.K., Huang P.Y., Kao C.Y., Wang D. Co-expression of neighboring genes in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) genome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:3658-3670.
50. Versteeg R., van Schaik B.D., van Batenburg M.F., Roos M., Monajemi R., Caron H., Bussemaker H.J., van Kampen A.H. The human transcriptome map reveals extremes in gene density, intron length, GC content, and repeat pattern for domains of highly and weakly expressed genes. Genome Res. 2003, 13:1998-2004.
51. Walter L., Hurt P., Himmelbauer H., Sudbrak R., Günther E. Physical mapping of the major histocompatibility complex class II and class III regions of the rat. Immunogenetics 2002, 4:268-275.
52. Waterston R.H., et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002, 420:520-562.
53. Wittkop T., Berman A.E., Fleisch K.M., Mooney S.D. DEFOG: discrete enrichment of functionally organized genes. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 2012, 4(7):795-804. (Jul).
54. Woo Y.H., Walker M., Churchill G.A. Coordinated expression domains in mammalian genomes. PLoS One 2010, 5(8):e12158.
55. Yanai I., Mellor J.C., DeLisi C. Identifying functional links between genes using conserved chromosomal proximity. Trends Genet. 2002, 18:176-179.
56. Yi G., Sze S.H., Thon M.R. Identifying clusters of functionally related genes in genomes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1053-1060.
57. Yu H., Kim P.M., Sprecher E., Trifonov V., Gerstein M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3:e59.
58. Zorio D.A., Cheng N.N., Blumenthal T., Spieth J. Operons as a common form of chromosomal organization in C. elegans. Nature 1994, 372:270-272.