Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 91, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 4669-4678

  Chen, L ^a,b   Schenkel, F ^b   Vinsky, M ^c   Crews Jr , D H ^d   Li, C ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c LACOMBE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^d Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Across breed genomic prediction; Beef cattle; Illumina bovine SNP50 beadchip; Residual feed intake; Within breed genomic prediction

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EATING; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; EATING; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84884762309     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-5715     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abecasis, G. R., and W. O. C. Cookson. 2000. Gold Graphical overview of linkage disequilibrium. Bioinformatics 16:182183.
2. Archer, J. A., E. C. Richardson, R. M. Herd, and P. F. Arthur. 1999. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: A review. Aust. J. Agrie. Res. 50:147161.
3. Briggs, H. M., and D. M. Briggs. 1980. Modern breeds of livestock. 4th ed. Macmillan, New York, NY.
4. Browning, S. R., and B. L. Browning. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missingdata inference for wholegenome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81:1084-1097.
5. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol. 1. E. D. Olfert, B. M. Cross, and A. A. McWilliams, ed. CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
6. Clark, S. A., J. M. Hickey, and J. H. J. van der Werf. 2011. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:18.
7. Daetwyler, H. D., R. PongWong, B. Villanueva, and J. A. Woolhams. 2010. The impact of genetic architecture on genomewide evaluation methods. Genetics 185:10211031.
8. Daetwyler, H. D., B. Villanueva, and J. A. Woolliams. 2008. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genomewide approach. PLoS ONE 3:E3395.
9. de Roos, A. P. W., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2009. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 183:1545-1553.
10. de Roos, A. P. W., B. J. Hayes, R. J. Spelman, and M. E. Goddard.2008.-Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in hol steinfriesian, jersey and angus cattle. Genetics 179:15031512.
11. Fernando, R. L., and D. J. Garrick. 2008. Gensel User manual for a portfolio of genomic selection related analyses. Animal Breeding and Genetics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. http://bigs.ansci.iastate.edu/bigsgui/login.html. (accessed January 23,2012)
12. Gilmour, A. R, B. J. Gogel, B. R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2009. Asreml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, HP1 ÍES, UK. www.vsni.co.uk/. (accessed March 10,2012)
13. Goddard, M. 2009. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genética (The Hague) 136:245-257.
14. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomeassisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389-2397.
15. Hayes, B. J., P. J. Bowman, A. J. Chamberlain, and M. E. Goddard.2009-Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Prog ress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92:433-443.
16. Hayes, B. J., J. Pryce, A. J. Chamberlain, P. J. Bowman, and M. E. Goddard. 2010. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: Coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genet. 6:E1001139. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.l001139
17. Ibánez-Escriche, N., R. L. Fernando, A. Toosi, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2009. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:12.
18. Kizilkaya, K., R. L. Fernando, and D. J. Garrick. 2010. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. J. Anim. Sci. 88:544-551.
19. Koch, R. M., K. E. Gregory, D. Chambers, and L. A. Swiger. 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22:486-194.
20. Mao, F., L. Chen, M. Vinsky, E. Okine, Z. Wang, J. Basarab, D. H. Crews Jr., and C. Li. 2013. Phenotypic and genetic relationships of feed efficiency with growth performance, ultrasound and carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais steers. J. Anim. Sci. 91:2067-2076.
21. McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, and J. F. D. Greenhalgh. 1988. Animal nutrition. 4th ed. Harlow, Essex, UK.
22. McKay, S. D., R. S. Schnabel, B. M. Murdoch, L. K. Matukumalli, J. Aerts, W. Coppieters, D. Crews, E. Dias Neto, C. A. Gill, C. Gao, H. Mannen, P. Stothard, Z. Wang, C. P. Van Tassell, J. L. Williams, J. F Taylor, and S. S. Moore. 2007. Whole genome linkage disequilibrium maps in cattle. BMC Genet. 8:74.
23. Meuwissen, T. H, B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
24. Mujibi, F. D., J. D. Nkrumah, O. H. Durunna, P. Stothard, J. Mah, Z. Wang, J. Basarab, G. Plastow, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore. 2011. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 89:3353-3361.
25. Perry, T. W., and M. J. Cecava. 1995. Beef cattle feeding and nutrition. 2nd ed. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.
26. Pryce, J. E., B. Gredler, S. Bolormaa, P. J. Bowman, C. Egger-Dan-ner, C. Fuerst, R. Emmerling, J. Solkner, M. E. Goddard, and B. J. Hayes. 2011. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population. J. Dairy Sci. 94:2625-2630.
27. Saatchi, M., M. C. McClure, S. D. McKay, M. M. Rolf, J. Kim, J. E. Decker, T. M. Taxis, R. H. Chappie, H. R. Ramey, S. L. Northcutt, S. Bauck, B. Woodward, J. C. Dekkers, R. L. Fernando, R. D. Schnabel, D. J. Garrick, and J. F. Taylor. 2011. Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using k-means clustering for cross-validation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:40.
28. Toosi, A., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2010. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J. Anim. Sci. 88:32-46.
29. VanRaden, P. M. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91:4414-4423.
30. VanRaden, P. M., C. P. Van Tassell, G. R. Wiggans, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and F. S. Schenkel. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92:1624.