Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: A multi-institutional randomised controlled trial

BJU International

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 336-345

  Chowriappa, Ashirwad ^a,b   Raza, Syed Johar ^a   Fazili, Anees ^c   Field, Erinn ^a   Malito, Chelsea ^a   Samarasekera, Dinesh ^d   Shi, Yi ^a   Ahmed, Kamran ^g   Wilding, Gregory ^a   Kaouk, Jihad ^d   Eun, Daniel D ^e   Ghazi, Ahmed ^c   Peabody, James O ^f   Kesavadas, Thenkurussi ^b   Mohler, James L ^a   Guru, Khurshid A ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^g KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anastomosis; augmented reality; robot assisted; robotic; skills training; urethrovesical anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUGMENTED REALITY; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MENTAL LOAD; RESIDENT; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; URINARY TRACT SURGERY; ANASTOMOSIS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; SURGERY; TASK PERFORMANCE; URETHRA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; URETHRA;

EID: 84921593761     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12704     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators-a systematic review. BJU Int 2013; 111: 194-205
2. McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, Dale T, Hirst G, Catchpole K,. The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 109-115
3. Editorial comment. Guru KA. J Urol 2011; 186: 1024
4. Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ,. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1693-1700
5. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM,. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 2011; 185: 1191-1197
6. Larsen CR, Oestergaard J, Ottesen BS, Sørensen JL,. The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91: 1015-1028
7. Lallas CD,. Davis, Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons JW. Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Endourol 2012; 26: 283-293
8. Yudkowsky R, Luciano C, Banerjee P, et al. Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improves residents' ability to perform a ventriculostomy. Simul Healthc 2013; 8: 25-31
9. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ,. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? World J Surg 2007; 31: 764-772
10. El Sayed NA, Zayed HH, Sharawy MI,. ARSC: augmented reality student card. Comput Educ 2011; 56: 1045-1061
11. Mitha AP, Almekhlafi MA, Janjua MJ, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG,. Simulation and augmented reality in endovascular neurosurgery: lessons from aviation. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (Suppl. 1): 107-114
12. Sabbagh R, Chatterjee S, Chawla A, Hoogenes J, Kapoor A, Matsumoto ED,. Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol 2012; 187: 1861-1866
13. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ,. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 23-29
14. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, etal. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 431-452
15. Hwang G-J, Yang T-C, Tsai C-C, Yang SJ,. A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Comput Educ 2009; 53: 402-413
16. Sotiriou S, Bogner FX,. Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Adv Sci Lett 2008; 1: 114-122
17. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al. Content validation of a novel roboticsurgicalsimulator. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1130-1135
18. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Adal A, Kesavadas T, et al. Can image-based virtual reality help teach anatomy? J Endourol 2010; 24: 629-634
19. Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, et al. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 2013; 81: 767-774
20. Chowriappa AJ, Shi Y, Raza SJ, et al. Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training-the Robotic Skills Assessment Score. J Surg Res 2013; 185: 561-569
21. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ,. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 2012; 187: 247-252
22. Hart SG, Staveland LE,. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Hum Ment Workload 1988; 1: 139-183
23. Keehner M, Lippa Y, Montello DR, Tendick F, Hegarty M,. Learning a spatial skill for surgery: how the contributions of abilities change with practice. Appl Cogn Psychol 2006; 20: 487-503
24. McDougall EM, Kolla SB, Santos RT, Gan JM, Box GN, et al. Preliminarystudy of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills. J Urol 2009; 182: 1018-1025
25. Seymour NE,. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 2008; 32: 182
26. Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA, et al. Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of radical prostatectomy suture. J Endourol 2006; 20: 69
27. Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC,. Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vessicouretheral running anastamosis. J Endourol 2003; 17: 481
28. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, et al. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourologic skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167: 1243
29. Ritter E, Kindelan T, Michael C, Pimentel E, Bowyer M,. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS). Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1441-1445
30. Sidhu RS, Park J, Brydges R, et al. Laboratory based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 343