Simulation and augmented reality in endovascular neurosurgery: Lessons from aviation

Neurosurgery

Volumn 72, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2013, Pages

  Mitha, Alim P ^a   Almekhlafi, Mohammed A ^a,b   Janjua, Major Jameel J ^c   Albuquerque, Felipe C ^d   McDougall, Cameron G ^d  

^a FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c Canadian Air Force   (Canada)

^d ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Endovascular neurosurgery; Simulation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; ENDOVASCULAR NEUROSURGERY; HUMAN; NEUROSURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; HUMANS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SILICONES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84872056644     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827981fd     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Qureshi AI, Abou-Chebl A, Jovin TG. Qualification requirements for performing neurointerventional procedures: a report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging. 2008;18(4):433-447.
2. Lamata P, Ali W, Cano A, et al. Augmented reality for minimally invasive surgery: overview and some recent advances. In: Maad S, ed. Augmented Reality. New York, NY: InTech, 2010:230.
3. Perezgonzalez JD, LEE SY. New technologies for the student pilot. Contemporary issues in aviation education and research. Aviation Education and Research Proceedings. 2009:10-11.
4. Earnshaw JJ, Wyatt MG; Joint Vascular Research Group. Complications in vascular and endovascular surgery: how to avoid them and how to get out of trouble. Surg Pract. 2012;16(3):124.
5. Rousseau H, Chabbert V, Maracher MA, et al. The importance of imaging assessment before endovascular repair of thoracic aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(4):408-421.
6. Krebs WK, McCarley JS, Bryant EV. Effects of mission rehearsal simulation on air-to-ground target acquisition. Hum Factors. 1999;41(4):553-558. (Pubitemid 30194420)
7. Shappell S, Detwiler C, Holcomb K, Hackworth C, Boquet A, Wiegmann DA. Human error and commercial aviation accidents: an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2007;49(2):227-242. (Pubitemid 46493594)
8. Tedesco MM, Pak JJ, Harris EJ Jr, Krummel TM, Dalman RL, Lee JT. Simulation-based endovascular skills assessment: the future of credentialing? J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(5):1008-1011; discussion 1014.
9. King EG, Weily HS, Genton E, Ashbaugh DG. Consumption coagulopathy in the canine oleic acid model of fat embolism. Surgery. 1971;69(4):533-541.
10. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: what this means for procedural-based medicine. JAMA. 2004;292(24):3024-3026. (Pubitemid 39665305)
11. Gould DA, Kessel DO, Healey AE, Johnson SJ, Lewandowski WE. Simulators in catheter-based interventional radiology: training or computer games? Clin Radiol. 2006;61(7):556-561. (Pubitemid 43899336)
12. Tsang JS, Naughton PA, Leong S, Hill AD, Kelly CJ, Leahy AL. Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon. 2008;6(4):214-220.
13. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(3):203-205.
14. Berry M, Lystig T, Beard J, Klingestierna H, Reznick R, Lönn L. Porcine transfer study: virtual reality simulator training compared with porcine training in endovascular novices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(3):455-461. (Pubitemid 46599100)
15. Fargen KM, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, Turner RD, Ringer AJ, Mocco J. Simulator based angiography education in neurosurgery: results of a pilot educational program. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(6):438-441.
16. Bridges M, Diamond DL. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg. 1999;177(1):28-32. (Pubitemid 29088993)
17. Hsu JH, Younan D, Pandalai S, et al. Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1118-1125. (Pubitemid 40037279)
18. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, et al. Experienced endovascular interventionalists objectively improve their skills by attending carotid artery stent training courses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35(5):541-550. (Pubitemid 351469947)
19. Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1112-1117. (Pubitemid 40037278)
20. Spiotta AM, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ, Benzel EC, Schlenk R. Simulated diagnostic cerebral angiography in neurosurgical training: a pilot program [published online ahead of print May 10, 2012]. J Neurointerv Surg. doi:10. 1136/neurintsurg-2012-010319.
21. Schreiber TL, Strickman N, Davis T, et al. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: outcomes at 1 year. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(1):49-57.
22. Willaert W, Aggarwal R, Harvey K, et al. Efficient implementation of patientspecific simulated rehearsal for the carotid artery stenting procedure: part-task rehearsal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(2):158-166.
23. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Daruwalla F, et al. Simulated procedure rehearsal is more effective than a preoperative generic warm-up for endovascular procedures. Ann Surg 2012;255(6):1184-1189.
24. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Cheshire NJ, Vermassen FE. Recent advancements in medical simulation: patient-specific virtual reality simulation. World J Surg. 2012;36(7):1703-1712.
25. Hislop SJ, Hedrick JH, Singh MJ, et al. Simulation case rehearsals for carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(6):750-754.
26. Dawson DL, Lee ES, Hedayati N, Pevec WC. Four-year experience with a regional program providing simulation-based endovascular training for vascular surgery fellows. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(6):330-335.
27. Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 1997;6(4):355-385.
28. Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, Feiner S, Julier S, MacIntyre B. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2001;21:34-47. (Pubitemid 33048164)
29. Macchiarella ND, Liu D, Gangadharan SN, Vincenzi DA, Majoros AE. Augmented Reality as a Training Medium for Aviation/Aerospace Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2005:2174-2178.
30. Neumann U, Majoros A. Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance. Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symp. (VRAIS 98). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE CS Press, 1998:4-11.
31. Rios H, Hincapié M, Caponio A, Mercado E, González Mendívil E. Augmented reality: an advantageous option for complex training and maintenance operations in aeronautic related processes. In: Virtual and Mixed Reality: New Trends. New York/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011:87-96.
32. Macchiarella ND, Liu D, Vincenzi DA. Q augmented reality as a means of job task training in aviation. In: Hancock PA, Vincenzi DA, Wise JA, Mouloua M, eds. Human Factors in Simulation and Training 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008:333.
33. Söderman M, Babic D, Homan R, Andersson T. 3D roadmap in neuroangiography: technique and clinical interest. Neuroradiology. 2005;47(10):735-740. (Pubitemid 41554554)
34. Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R, et al. Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):W357-W364.
35. Okumura H, Terada T, Babic D, Homan R, Katsuma T. 3D Roadmapping in neuroendovascular procedures: an evaluation. MedicaMundi. 2010;54(3):5-11.
36. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, et al. Clinical benefits of rotational 3D angiography in endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(4):686-688. (Pubitemid 34411932)
37. Cooke DL, Levitt M, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Ghodke B. Intraorbital access using fluoroscopic flat panel detector CT navigation and three-dimensional MRI overlay. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2(3):249-251.
38. Cooke DL, Levitt M, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Ghodke B. Transcranial access using fluoroscopic flat panel detector CT navigation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(4):E69-E70.
39. Saeed M, Hetts SW, English J, Wilson M. MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(1):117-137.
40. Ruijters D, Homan R, Mielekamp P, van de Haar P, Babic D. Validation of 3D multimodality roadmapping in interventional neuroradiology. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(16):5335-5354.