Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical trainingdthe Robotic Skills Assessment Score

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 185, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 561-569

  Chowriappa, Ashirwad J ^a,b   Shi, Yi ^b   Raza, Syed Johar ^a   Ahmed, Kamran ^c   Stegemann, Andrew ^a   Wilding, Gregory ^b   Kaouk, Jihad ^d   Peabody, James O ^e   Menon, Mani ^e   Hassett, James M ^b   Kesavadas, Thenkurussi ^b   Guru, Khurshid A ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Robotic skills assessment; Robotic training; Score; Scoring system; Surgical training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTION; NEEDLE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENT; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGICAL TRAINING; ROBOTIC SKILL ASSESSMENT SCORE; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATOR; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TISSUE INJURY; VIRTUAL REALITY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; ROBOTIC SKILLS ASSESSMENT; ROBOTIC TRAINING; ROBOTICS; SCORE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ROBOTIC SKILLS ASSESSMENT; ROBOTIC TRAINING; SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TRAINING;

ADULT; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84891682445     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.054     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulatorsda systematic review. BJU Int 2013;111:194.
2. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 2010;24:467.
3. Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int 2013;111:518
4. McCulloch P, Mishra A, Handa A, Dale T, Hirst G, Catchpole K. The effects of aviation-style non-technical skills training on technical performance and outcome in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:109.
5. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 2001;322:517.
6. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 2009;16:4736. discussion 4741.
7. Kesavadas T, Stegemann A, Sathyaseelan G, et al. Validation of Robotic Surgery Simulator (RoSS). Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;163:274.
8. Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, et al. Face, content, and construct validation of the Da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 2012;79:1068.
9. Gallagher AG, Satava RM. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1746.
10. Mackay S, Datta V, Chang A, Shah J, Kneebone R, Darzi A. Multiple Objective Measures of Skill (MOMS): a new approach to the assessment of technical ability in surgical trainees. Ann Surg 2003;238:291.
11. van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 2007;21:1413.
12. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 2011;185:1191.
13. Sweet RM, Hananel D, Lawrenz F. A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training. Arch Surg 2010;145:197.
14. Andrew P, Stegemann KA, Syed JR, et al. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 2013;81:767.
15. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int 2011;107:1130.
16. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J. Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 2003;17:803.
17. Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:308.
18. Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, et al. Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1834.
19. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005;190:107.
20. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 2012;187:247.