Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: What can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations?

Oikos

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 4-13

  Forrest, Jessica R K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; PERSISTENCE; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATOR; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEED PRODUCTION; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84921514987     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.01386     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Anderson J. T. et al. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change. - Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 3843-3852.
2. Augspurger C. 2013. Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing. - Ecology 94: 41-50.
3. Bartomeus I. et al. 2011. Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 20654-20659.
4. Bartomeus I. et al. 2013. Biodiversity ensures plant-pollinator phenological synchrony against climate change. - Ecol. Lett. 16: 1331-1338.
5. Bauer S. et al. 2008. The relevance of environmental conditions for departure decision changes en route in migrating geese. - Ecology 89: 1953-1960.
6. Benadi G. et al. 2014. Specialization and phenological synchrony of plant-pollinator interactions along an altitudinal gradient. - J. Anim. Ecol. 83: 639-650.
7. Boggs C. L. and Inouye D. W. 2012. A single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics. - Ecol. Lett. 15: 502-508.
8. Bosch J. and Kemp W. P. 2000. Development and emergence of the orchard pollinator Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). - Environ. Entomol. 29: 8-13.
9. Bosch J. and Kemp W. P. 2003. Effect of wintering duration and temperature on survival and emergence time in males of the orchard pollinator Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). - Environ. Entomol. 32: 711-716.
10. Bosch J. et al. 2000. Management of Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) populations for almond pollination: methods to advance bee emergence. - Environ. Entomol. 29: 874-883.
11. Bosch J. et al. 2010. Timing of eclosion affects diapause development, fat body consumption and longevity in Osmia lignaria, a univoltine, adult-wintering solitary bee. - J. Insect Physiol. 56: 1949-1957.
12. Buckley L. B. and Kingsolver J. G. 2012. Functional and phylogenetic approaches to forecasting species' responses to climate change. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 43: 205-226.
13. Burkle L. A. et al. 2013. Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence and function. - Science 339: 1611-1615.
14. Calinger K. M. et al. 2013. Herbarium specimens reveal the footprint of climate change on flowering trends across north-central North America. - Ecol. Lett. 16: 1037-1044.
15. Carroll A. B. et al. 2001. Drought stress, plant water status and floral trait expression in fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). - Am. J. Bot. 88: 436-446.
16. Chuine I. 2010. Why does phenology drive species distribution? - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3149-3160.
17. Chuine I. et al. 2003. Plant development models. - In: Schwartz M. D. (ed.), Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Kluwer Academic, pp. 217-235.
18. Cook B. I. et al. 2012. Divergent responses to spring and winter warming drive community level flowering trends. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: 9000-9005.
19. Crimmins T. M. et al. 2010. Complex responses to climate drivers in onset of spring flowering across a semi-arid elevation gradient. - J. Ecol. 98: 1042-1051.
20. Crone E. E. 2013. Responses of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources. - Am. Nat. 182: 465-473.
21. Doi H. et al. 2008. Heterogeneous intra-annual climatic changes drive different phenological responses at two trophic levels. - Climate Res. 36: 181-190.
22. Ellwood E. R. et al. 2012. Disentangling the paradox of insect phenology: are temporal trends reflecting the response to warming? - Oecologia 168: 1161-1171.
23. Erhardt A. et al. 2005. Elevated carbon dioxide increases nectar production in Epilobium angustifolium L. - Oecologia 146: 311-317.
24. Fabina N. S. et al. 2010. Sensitivity of plant-pollinator-herbivore communities to changes in phenology. - Ecol. Modell. 221: 453-458.
25. Forrest J. R. K. and Thomson J. D. 2011. An examination of synchrony between insect emergence and flowering in Rocky Mountain meadows. - Ecol. Monogr. 81: 469-491.
26. Franks S. J. et al. 2007. Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104: 1278-1282.
27. Friedman J. and Willis J. H. 2013. Major QTLs for critical photoperiod and vernalization underlie extensive variation in flowering in the Mimulus guttatus species complex. - New Phytol. 199: 571-583.
28. Gillespie D. R. et al. 2012. Effects of simulated heat waves on an experimental community of pepper plants, green peach aphids and two parasitoid species. - Oikos 121: 149-159.
29. Gordo O. and Sanz J. J. 2005. Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality. - Oecologia 146: 484-495.
30. Green K. 2010. Alpine taxa exhibit differing responses to climate warming in the Snowy Mountains of Australia. - J. Mt. Sci. 7: 167-175.
31. Hegland S. J. et al. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? - Ecol. Lett. 12: 184-195.
32. Hodgson J. A. et al. 2011. Predicting insect phenology across space and time. - Global Change Biol. 17: 1289-1300.
33. Høye T. T. et al. 2013. Shorter flowering seasons and declining abundance of flower visitors in a warmer Arctic. - Nat. Climate Change 3: 759-763.
34. Ibáñez I. et al. 2010. Forecasting phenology under global warming. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3247-3260.
35. Iler A. M. et al. 2013a. Nonlinear flowering responses to climate: are species approaching their limits of phenological change? - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120489.
36. Iler A. M. et al. 2013b. Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate. - Global Change Biol. 19: 2348-2359.
37. Inouye D. W. 2008. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. - Ecology 89: 353-362.
38. Inouye D. W. et al. 2003. Environmental influences on the phenology and abundance of flowering by Androsace septentrionalis (Primulaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 90: 905-910.
39. IPCC 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contrib. of Working Grp I to the 4th Assess. Rep. of the IPCC. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
40. 2 conditions: a meta-analysis of reports on 79 crop and wild species. - New Phytol. 156: 9-26.
41. Jennersten O. and Nillson S. G. 1993. Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size in Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). - Oikos 68: 283-292.
42. Kraemer M. E. and Favi F. D. 2010. Emergence phenology of Osmia lignaria subsp. lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), its parasitoid Chrysura kyrae (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), and bloom of Cercis canadensis. - Environ. Entomol. 39: 351-358.
43. Kudo G. and Ida T. Y. 2013. Early onset of spring increases the phenological mismatch between plants and pollinators. - Ecology 94: 2311-2320.
44. Kudo G. et al. 2004. Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early? - Ecol. Res. 19: 255-259.
45. Kunin W. E. 1993. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. - Ecology 74: 2145-2160.
46. Lake J. C. and Hughes L. 1999. Nectar production and floral characteristics of Tropaeolum majus L. grown in ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. - Ann. Bot. 84: 535-541.
47. Lambert A. M. et al. 2010. Changes in snowmelt date and summer precipitation affect the flowering phenology of Erythronium grandiflorum (glacier lily; Liliaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 97: 1431-1437.
48. Laube J. et al. 2014. Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development. - Global Change Biol. 20: 170-182.
49. Liancourt P. et al. 2012. Vulnerability of the northern Mongolian steppe to climate change: insights from flower production and phenology. - Ecology 93: 815-824.
50. Liu Y. et al. 2011. Shifting phenology and abundance under experimental warming alters trophic relationships and plant reproductive capacity. - Ecology 92: 1201-1207.
51. McKinney A. M. et al. 2012. Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating broad-tailed hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. - Ecology 93: 1987-1993.
52. Memmott J. et al. 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 10: 710-717.
53. Meurisse N. et al. 2012. Low temperature tolerance and starvation ability of the oak processionary moth: implications in a context of increasing epidemics. - Agric. For. Entomol. 14: 239-250.
54. Miller-Rushing A. J. and Inouye D. W. 2009. Variation in the impact of climate change on flowering phenology and abundance: an examination of two pairs of closely related wildflower species. - Am. J. Bot. 96: 1-10.
55. Miller-Rushing A. J. et al. 2010. The effects of phenological mismatch on demography. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3177-3186.
56. Moise E. R. D. and Henry H. A. L. 2010. Like moths to a street lamp: exaggerated animal densities in plot-level global change field experiments. - Oikos 119: 791-795.
57. Ovaskainen O. et al. 2013. Community-level phenological response to climate change. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 13434-13439.
58. Parsche S. et al. 2011. Experimental environmental change and mutualistic vs. antagonistic plant flower-visitor interactions. - Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 13: 27-35.
59. Pauli J. N. et al. 2013. The subnivium: a deteriorating seasonal refugium. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 11: 260-267.
60. Peñuelas J. et al. 2004. Nonintrusive field experiments show different plant responses to warming and drought among sites, seasons, and species in a north-south European gradient. - Ecosystems 7: 598-612.
61. Petanidou T. et al. 2008. Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. - Ecol. Lett. 11: 564-575.
62. 2: on winners, losers and functional groups. - New Phytol. 157: 175-198.
63. Praz C. J. et al. 2008. Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen?- Ecology 89: 795-804.
64. Rader R. et al. 2013. Native bees buffer the negative impact of climate warming on honey bee pollination of watermelon crops. - Global Change Biol. 19: 3103-3110.
65. Rafferty N. E. and Ives A. R. 2011. Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 14: 69-74.
66. Rafferty N. E. and Ives A. R. 2012. Pollinator effectiveness varies with experimental shifts in flowering time. - Ecology 93: 803-814.
67. Rafferty N. E. et al. 2013. Phenological overlap of interacting species in a changing climate: an assessment of available approaches. - Ecol. Evol. 3: 3183-3193.
68. Régnière J. et al. 2012. Effects of temperature on development, survival and reproduction of insects: experimental design, data analysis and modeling. - J. Insect Physiol. 58: 634-647.
69. Roland J. and Matter S. F. 2013. Variability in winter climate and winter extremes reduces population growth of an alpine butterfly. - Ecology 94: 190-199.
70. Roulston T. H. and Goodell K. 2011. The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 293-312.
71. 2 on flowering phenology and nectar production of nectar plants important for butterflies of calcareous grasslands. - Oecologia 113: 341-349.
72. Scaven V. L. and Rafferty N. E. 2013. Physiological effects of climate warming on flowering plants and insect pollinators and potential consequences for their interactions. - Curr. Zool. 59: 418-426.
73. Sedivy C. et al. 2008. Patterns of host-plant choice in bees of the genus Chelostoma: the constraint hypothesis of host-range evolution in bees. - Evolution 62: 2487-2507.
74. Sgolastra F. et al. 2012. Duration of prepupal summer dormancy regulates synchronization of adult diapause with winter temperatures in bees of the genus Osmia. - J. Insect Physiol. 58: 924-933.
75. Sih A. and Baltus M. S. 1987. Patch size, pollinator behavior and pollinator limitation in catnip. - Ecology 68: 1679-1690.
76. Singer M. C. and Wee B. 2005. Spatial pattern in checkerspot butterfly-host plant association at local, metapopulation and regional scales. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 42: 347-361.
77. Smithson A. and Macnair M. R. 1997. Density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection by bumblebees Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60: 401-417.
78. Söndgerath D. et al. 2012. Large spatial scale effects of rising temperatures: modelling a dragonfly's life cycle and range throughout Europe. - Insect Conserv. Diver. 5: 461-469.
79. Sparks T. H. et al. 2005. Examining the total arrival distribution of migratory birds. - Global Change Biol. 11: 22-30.
80. Steltzer H. et al. 2009. Biological consequences of earlier snowmelt from desert dust deposition in alpine landscapes. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 11629-11634.
81. Thomson J. D. 2010. Flowering phenology, fruiting success, and progressive deterioration of pollination in an early-flowering geophyte. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3187-3199.
82. Tooke F. and Battey N. H. 2010. Temperate flowering phenology. - J. Exp. Bot. 61: 2853-2862.
83. Visscher P. K. et al. 1994. Benthic bees? Emergence phenology of Calliopsis pugionis (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) at a seasonally flooded site. - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 941-945.
84. Wcislo W. T. and Cane J. H. 1996. Floral resource utilization by solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and exploitation of their stored foods by natural enemies. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 257-286.
85. Wiens J. A. et al. 2009. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19729-19736.
86. Williams N. M. 2003. Use of novel pollen species by specialist and generalist solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). - Oecologia 134: 228-237.
87. Williams N. M. and Kremen C. 2007. Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. - Ecol. Appl. 17: 910-921.
88. Williams N. M. et al. 2012. Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees. - Ecology 93: 1049-1058.
89. Willmer P. 2012. Ecology: pollinator-plant synchrony tested by climate change. - Curr. Biol. 22: R131-R132.
90. Willmer P. G. and Stone G. N. 2004. Behavioral, ecological, and physiological determinants of the activity patterns of bees. - Adv. Study Behav. 34: 347-466.
91. Wolkovich E. M. et al. 2012. Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. - Nature 485: 494-497.
92. Yang L. H. and Rudolf V. H. W. 2010. Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 1-10.