Patterns of host-plant choice in bees of the genus Chelostoma: The constraint hypothesis of host-range evolution in bees

Evolution

Volumn 62, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2487-2507

  Sedivy, Claudio ^a   Praz, Christophe J ^a   Müller, Andreas ^a   Widmer, Alex ^a   Dorn, Silvia ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ancestral state reconstruction; Evolutionary constraint; Oligolecty; Phylogeny; Pollination; Supermatrix

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; BEE; EVOLUTION; HOST PLANT; HOST SELECTION; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; SPECIALIZATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWER; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BEES; EVOLUTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN;

APOIDEA; CHELOSTOMA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MEGACHILIDAE;

EID: 54649083490     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00465.x     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Amiet, F., M. Herrmann, A. Müller, and R. Neumeyer. 2004. Apidae 4: Anthidium, Chelostoma, Coelioxys, Dioxys, Heriades, Lithurgus, Megachile, Osmia, Stelis. Fauna Helvetica 9. Centre suisse de cartographie de la faune, Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft, Neuchâtel.
2. Bensasson, D., D. X. Zhang, D. Hartl, and M. H. Hewitt. 2001. Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 314 321.
3. Bernays, E. A. 1998. The value of being a resource specialist: behavioral support for a neural hypothesis. Am. Nat. 151 : 451 464.
4. Bernays, E. A. 2001. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46 : 703 727.
5. Bernays, E. A., and W. T. Wcislo. 1994. Sensory capabilities, information processing and resource specialization. Q. Rev. Biol. 69 : 187 204.
6. Cane, J. H., and J. A. Payne. 1988. Foraging ecology of the bee Habropoda laboriosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae), an oligolege of blueberries (Ericaceae: Vaccinium) in the southeastern USA. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Am. 81 : 419 427.
7. Cane, J. H., and S. Sipes. 2006. Characterizing floral specialization by bees: analytical methods and a revised lexicon for oligolecty. Pp. 99 122 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton, eds. Plant-pollinator interactions from specialization to generalization. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Chittka, L., J. Spaethe, A. Schmidt, and A. Hickelsberger. 2001. Adaptation, constraint, and chance in the evolution of flower color and pollinator color vision. Pp. 106 126 in L. Chittka and J. D. Thomson, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Constance, L., and T. I. Chuang. 1982. SEM survey of pollen morphology and classification in Hydrophyllaceae (Waterleaf family). Am. J. Bot. 69 : 40 53.
10. Cornell, H. V., and B. A. Hawkins. 2003. Herbivore responses to plant secondary compounds: a test of phytochemical coevolution theory. Am. Nat. 161 : 507 522.
11. Danforth, B. N. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of the Perdita subgenera Macrotera, Macroteropsis, Macroterella and Cockerellula (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 55 : 635 692.
12. Danforth, B. N. 1999. Phylogeny of the bee genus Lasioglossum (Hymenoptera : Halictidae) based on mitochondrial COI sequence data. Syst. Entomol. 24 : 377 393.
13. Danforth, B. N., L. Conway, and S. Li. 2003. Phylogeny of eusocial Lasioglossum reveals multiple losses of eusociality within a primitively eusocial clade of bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Syst. Biol. 52 : 23 36.
14. Danforth, B. N., S. G. Brady, S. D. Sipes, and A. Pearson. 2004. Single-copy nuclear genes recover Cretaceous-age divergences in bees. Syst. Biol. 53 : 309 326.
15. Danforth, B. N., J. Fang, and S. Sipes. 2006a. Analysis of family-level relationships in bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) using 28S and two previously unexplored nuclear genes: CAD and RNA polymerase II. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39 : 358 372.
16. Danforth, B. N., S. D. Sipes, J. Fang, and S. G. Brady. 2006b. The history of early bee diversification based on five genes plus morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 15118 15123.
17. Eickwort, G. C., and H. S. Ginsberg. 1980. Foraging and mating behavior in Apoidea. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25 : 421 446.
18. Egan, S. P., and D. J. Funk. 2006. Individual advantages to ecological specialization: insights on cognitive constraints from three conspecific taxa. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273 : 843 848.
19. Fischer, S., J. Samietz, F. Wäckers, and S. Dorn. 2001. Interaction of vibrational and visual cues in parasitoid host location. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187 : 785 791.
20. Futuyma, D. J., M. C. Keese, and S. J. Scheffer. 1993. Genetic constraints and the phylogeny of insect-plant associations: responses of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) to host plants of its congeners. Evolution 47 : 888 905.
21. Futuyma, D. J., J. S. Walsh, T. Morton, D. J. Funk, and M. C. Keese. 1994. Genetic variation in a phylogenetic context: responses of two specialized leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) to host plants of their congeners. J. Evol. Biol. 7 : 127 146.
22. Futuyma, D. J., M. C. Keese, and D. J. Funk. 1995. Genetic constraints on macroevolution: the evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 49 : 797 809.
23. Giurfa, M., and M. Lehrer. 2001. Honeybee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition. Pp. 61 82 in L. Chittka and J. D. Thomson eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. Gogala, A. 1999. Bee fauna of Slovenia: checklist of species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Scopolia 42 : 1 79.
25. Harvey, P. 1996. Phylogenies for ecologists. J. Anim. Ecol. 65 : 255 264.
26. Hines, H. H. 2008. Historical biogeography, divergence times, and diversification patterns of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Syst. Biol. 57 : 58 75.
27. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 755.
28. Hurd, P. D., and E. G. Linsley. 1975. The principal Larrea bees of the southwestern United States (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Contr. Zool. 193 : 1 74.
29. Hurd, P. D., and C. D. Michener. 1955. The megachiline bees of California (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Bull. California Insect Survey 3 : 1 148.
30. Hurd, P. D., W. E. LaBerge, and E. G. Linsely. 1980. Principal sunflower bees of North America with emphasis on the southwestern United States (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Contr. Zool. 310 : 1 158.
31. Iwata, K. 1976. Evolution of instinct. Comparative ethology of Hymenoptera. Amerind, New Delhi.
32. Janz, N., and S. Nylin. 2008. The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. Pp. 203 215 in K. J. Tilmon, ed. Specialization, speciation, and radiation. The evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
33. Janz, N., S. Nylin, and K. Nyblom. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55 : 783 796.
34. Krombein, K. V., P. D. J. Hurd, D. R. Smith, and B. D. Burkers (eds). 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Smithsonian Press, Washington.
35. Larkin, L. L., J. L. Neff, and B. B. Simpson. 2008. The evolution of a pollen diet: host choice and diet breadth of Andrena bees (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Apidologie 39 : 133 145.
36. Laverty, T. M., and R. C. Plowright. 1988. Flower handling by bumblebees: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Anim. Behav. 36 : 733 740.
37. Linsley, E. G. 1958. The ecology of solitary bees. Hilgardia 27 : 543 599.
38. Linsley, E. G., and J. W. MacSwain. 1958. The significance of floral constancy among bees of the genus Diadasia (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae). Evolution 12 : 219 223.
39. Lovell, J. H. 1913. The origin of the oligotropic habit among bees. Entomol. News 24 : 104 112.
40. Lunt, D. H., D. X. Zhang, J. M. Szymura, and G. M. Hewitt 1914. The origin of oligotropism. Entomol. News 25 : 314 321.
41. Lunt, D. H., D. X. Zhang, J. M. Szymura, and G. M. Hewitt. 1996. The insect cytochrome oxidase I gene: evolutionary patterns and conserved primers for phylogenetic studies. Insect Mol. Biol. 5 : 153 165.
42. MacSwain, J. W., P. H. Raven, and R. W. Thorp. 1973. Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae. IV. Clarkia bees of the western United States. Univ. California Publ. Entomol. 70 : 1 80.
43. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2005. Macclade 4.08 for OSX. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
44. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2007. Mesquite 2.0. A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Available at http://mesquiteproject.org. Accessed December 15, 2007.
45. Mauss, V., A. Müller, and R. Prosi. 2006. Mating, nesting and flower association of the east Mediterranean pollen wasp Ceramius bureschi in Greece (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Masarinae). Entomol. Gen. 29 : 1 26.
46. McGuire, J. A., C. C. Witt, D. L. Altshuler, and J. V. Remsen. 2007. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy. Syst. Biol. 56 : 837 856.
47. Michener, C. D. 1938. American bees of the genus Chelostoma. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 14 : 36 45.
48. Michener, C. D. 1942. Taxonomic notes on the genera Chelostoma and Ashmeadiella (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Entomol. News 53 : 47 51.
49. Michener, C. D. 1954. Records and descriptions of North American megachilid bees. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 27 : 65 78.
50. Michener, C. D. 1979. Biogeography of the bees. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 66 : 277 347.
51. Michener, C. D. 2007. The bees of the world. 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
52. Michener, C. D., and C. W. Rettenmeyer. 1956. The ethology of Andrena erythronii with comparative data on other species (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 37 : 645 684.
53. Michez, D., M. Terzo, and P. Rasmont. 2004. Phylogénie, biogeography et choix floraux des abeilles oligolectiques du genre Dasypoda Latreille 1802 (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Melittidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (n.s.) 40 : 421 435.
54. Michez, D., S. Patiny, P. Rasmont, K. Timmermann, and N. J. Vereecken. 2008. Phylogeny and host-plant evolution in Melittidae s.l. (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Apidologie 39 : 146 162.
55. Minckley, R.L., and T. H. Roulston. 2006. Incidental mutualism and pollen specialization among bees. Pp. 69 98 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton eds. Plant-pollinator interactions from specialization to generalization. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
56. Minckley, R. L., J. H. Cane, and L. Kervin. 2000. Origins and ecological consequences of pollen specialization among desert bees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 : 265 271.
57. Moldenke, A. R. 1975. Niche specialization and species diversity along a California transect. Oecologia 21 : 219 242.
58. Moldenke, A. R. 1979. Host-plant coevolution and the diversity of bees in relation to the flora of North America. Phytologia 43 : 357 419.
59. Moldenke, A. R., and J. L. Neff. 1974. The bees of California, a catalogue with special relevance to pollination and ecological research. University of California, Santa Cruz.
60. Müller, A. 1996. Host-plant specialization in western palearctic anthidiine bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae). Ecol. Monogr. 66 : 235 257.
61. Müller, A., S. Diener, S. Schnyder, K. Stutz, C. Sedivy, and S. Dorn. 2006. Quantitative pollen requirements of solitary bees: implications for bee conservation and the evolution of bee-flower relationships. Biol. Conserv. 130 : 604 615.
62. Müller, A., and M. Kuhlmann. Pollen hosts of western palaearctic bees of the genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) - the Asteraceae paradox. Biol. J. Linn. Soc : In press.
63. Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Available at http://www.abc.se/∼nylander/. Accessed April 7, 2007.
64. Nylander, J. A. A., F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and J. L. Nieves-Aldrey. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53 : 47 67.
65. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48 : 612 622.
66. Pagel, M., and A. Meade. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167 : 808 825.
67. Pagel, M., A. Meade, and D. Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53 : 673 684.
68. Parker, F. D. 1988. Nesting biology of two North American species of Chelostoma (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 64 : 1 7.
69. Patiny, S., D. Michez, and B. N. Danforth. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships and host-plant evolution within the basal clade of Halictidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Cladistics 23 : 1 15.
70. Pesenko, Y. A., and V. D. Radchenko. 1993. The use of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) for alfalfa pollination: the main directions and modes, with methods of evaluation of populations of wild bees and pollinator efficiency. Entomol. Rev. 72 : 101 119.
71. Praz, C. J., A. Müller, and S. Dorn. 2008. Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen? Ecology 89 : 795 804.
72. Praz, C. J., A. Müller, and S. Dorn. Host recognition in a pollen-specialist bee: evidence for a genetic basis. Apidologie : In press.
73. Praz, C. J., A. Müller, B. N. Danforth, T. L. Griswold, A. Widmer, and S. Dorn. Phylogeny and biogeography of bees of the tribe Osmiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. In press.
74. Queiroz, A. de, and Gatesy, J. 2006. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 : 34 41.
75. Rambaut, A., and A. J. Drummond. 2003. Tracer, MCMC Trace Analysis Tool Version v1.4 http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/).
76. Robertson, C. 1899. Flowers and insects. Bot. Gazette 28 : 27 45.
77. Robertson, C. 1925. Heterotropic bees. Ecology 6 : 412 436.
78. Schlindwein, C., D. Wittmann, C. F. Martins, A. Hamm, J. A. Siqueira, D. Schiffler, and I. C. Machado. 2005. Pollination of Campanula rapunculus L. (Campanulaceae): How much pollen flows into pollination and into reproduction of oligolectic pollinators? Plant Syst. Evol. 250 : 147 156.
79. Schwarz, M., and F. Gusenleitner. 2000. Weitere Angaben zur Bienenfauna Österreichs sowie Beschreibung einer neuen Chelostoma-Art aus der Westpaläarktis. Vorstudie zu einer Gesamtbearbeitung der Bienen Österreichs IV (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Entomofauna 21 : 133 164.
80. Schwarz, M., F. Gusenleitner, P. Westrich, and H. H. Dathe. 1996. Katalog der Bienen Österreichs, Deutschlands und der Schweiz (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Entomofauna 8 : 1 398.
81. Singer, M. S. 2008. Evolutionary ecology of polyphagy. Pp. 29 42 in K. J. Tilmon, ed. Specialization, speciation, and radiation. The evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
82. Sipes, S. D., and V. J. Tepedino. 2005. Pollen-host specificity and evolutionary patterns of host switching in a clade of specialist bees (Apoidea: Diadasia). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86 : 487 505.
83. Sipes, S. D., and P. G. Wolf. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships within Diadasia, a group of specialist bees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19 : 144 156.
84. Slansky, F. 1993. Nutritional ecology: the fundamental quest for nutrients. Pp. 29 91 in N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey, eds. Caterpillars: ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York.
85. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, P. K. Endress, and M. W. Chase. 2005. Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
86. Strauss, S. Y., and A. R. Zangerl. 2002. Plant-insect interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Pp. 77 106 in C. Herrera and O. Pellmyr, eds. Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
87. Strickler, K. 1979. Specialization and foraging efficiency of solitary bees. Ecology 60 : 998 1009.
88. Swofford, D.L. 2002. Paup. 4.0b10 for Macintosh. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
89. Thorp, R. W. 1969. Systematics and ecology of bees of the subgenus Diandrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Univ. California Publ. Entomol. 52 : 1 146.
90. Ungricht, S., A. Müller, and S. Dorn. A taxonomic catalogue of the palaearctic bees of the tribe Osmiini (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae). Zootaxa : In press.
91. Warncke, K. 1991. Die Bienengattung Osmia Panzer 1806, ihre Systematik in der Westpaläarktis und ihre Verbreitung in der Türkei. 7. Die Untergattung Foveosmia. Linzer biol. Beitr. 23 : 267 281.
92. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams, and J. Ollerton. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77 : 1043 1060.
93. Wcislo, W. T., and J. H. Cane. 1996. Floral resource utilization by solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and exploitation of their stored foods by natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41 : 257 286.
94. Weingartner, E., N. Wahlberg, and S. Nylin. 2006. Dynamics of host plant use and species diversity in Polygonia butterflies (Nymphalidae). J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 483 491.
95. Westerkamp, C. 1996. Pollen in bee-flower relations - Some considerations on melittophily. Bot. Acta 109 : 325 332.
96. Westrich, P. 1989. Die Wildbienen Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
97. Westrich, P. 1993. Über die Verbreitung und Bionomie der Scherenbiene Chelostoma grande (Nylander) (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Linzer biol. Beitr. 25 : 97 111.
98. Westrich, P. 2008. Flexibles Pollensammelverhalten der ansonsten streng oligolektischen Seidenbiene Colletes hederae Schmidt & Westrich (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Eucera 1 : 17 29.
99. Westrich, P., and K. Schmidt. 1986. Methoden und Anwendungsgebiete der Pollenanalyse bei Wildbienen (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Linzer Biol. Beitr. 18 : 341 360.
100. Zhang, D. X., and G. M. Hewitt. 1996. Assessment of the universality and utility of a set of conserved mitochondrial COI primers in insects. Insect Mol. Biol. 6 : 143 150.