Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-81

  Rankin, D J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Inclusive fitness; Sex biased dispersal; Social evolution

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; KIN SELECTION; MULTIPLE MATING; RELATEDNESS; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFLICT; FEMALE; INBREEDING; MALE; POPULATION MIGRATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 78650233303     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02143.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alonzo, S.H. 2009. Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 99-108.
2. Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145-164.
3. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
4. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Arnqvist, G., Nilsson, T. & Katvala, M. 2005. Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils. Behav. Ecol. 16: 123-127.
6. Bean, D. & Cook, J.M. 2001. Male mating tactics and lethal combat in the nonpollinating fig wasp Sycoscapter australis. Anim. Behav. 62: 535-542.
7. Bilde, T., Lubin, Y., Smith, D., Schneider, J.M. & Maklakov, A.A. 2005. The transition to social inbred mating systems in spiders: role of inbreeding tolerance in a subsocial predecessor. Evolution 59: 160-174.
8. Boomsma, J.J. 2007. Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr. Biol. 17: R673-R683.
9. Bourke, A.F.G. 2009. The kin structure of sexual interactions. Biol. Lett. 5: 689-692.
10. Chapman, T. 2006. Evolutionary conflicts of interest between maes and females. Curr. Biol. 16: R744-R754.
11. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
12. Cook, J.M., Compton, S.G., Herre, E.A. & West, S.A. 1997. Alternative mating tactics and extreme male dimorphism in fig wasps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 747-754.
13. Crudgington, H.S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855-856.
14. Darden, S.K. & Croft, D.P. 2008. Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes. Biol. Lett. 4: 449-451.
15. Edvardsson, M. 2007. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: resource-rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim. Behav. 74: 183-188.
16. Edvardsson, M. & Tregenza, T. 2005. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 16: 788-793.
17. Eldakar, O.T., Dlugos, M.J., Pepper, J.W. & Wilson, D.S. 2009. Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders. Science 326: 816.
18. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338: 760-761.
19. Frank, S.A. 1994. Kin selection and virulence in the evolution of protocells and parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258: 152-161.
20. Frank, S.A. 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature 377: 520-522.
21. Frank, S.A. 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Gardner, A. 2010. Sex-biased dispersal of adults mediates the evolution of altruism among juveniles. J. Theor. Biol. 262: 339-345.
23. Gardner, A. & West, S.A. 2004. Spite and the scale of competition. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 1-9.
24. Godfray, H.C.J. & Cook, J.M. 1997. Mating systems of parasitoid wasps. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (J. C. Choe & B. Crespi, eds), pp. 211-225. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Greenwood, P.J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28: 1140-1162.
26. Griffin, A.S. & West, S.A. 2002. Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 15-21.
27. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-52.
28. Hamilton, W.D. 1970. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228: 1218-1220.
29. Hamilton, W.D. 1979. Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In: Reproductive Competition, Mate Choice and Sexual Selection in Insects (M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum, eds), pp. 167-220. Academic Press, New York and London.
30. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
31. Holland, B. & Rice, W.M. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 96: 5083-5088.
32. Hosken, D.J., Stockley, P., Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2009. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54: 361-378.
33. Johnstone, R.A. & Cant, M.A. 2008. Sex differences in dispersal and the evolution of helping and harming. Am. Nat. 172: 318-330.
34. Johnstone, R.A. & Keller, L. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conlfict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am. Nat. 156: 368-377.
35. Kokko, H. & Ots, I. 2006. When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution 60: 467-475.
36. Le Galliard, J.F., Fitze, P.S., Ferrière, R. & Clobert, J. 2005. Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 102: 18231-18236.
37. Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. 2006. The evolution of cooperation and altruism - a general framework and a classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1365-1376.
38. Lehmann, L. & Perrin, N. 2003. Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal. Am. Nat. 162: 638-652.
39. Maklakov, A.A. & Lubin, Y. 2004. Sexual conflict over mating in a spider: increased fecundity does not compensate for the costs of polyandry. Evolution 58: 1135-1140.
40. Maklakov, A.A. & Lubin, Y. 2006. Indirect genetic benefits of polyandry in a spider with direct costs of mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 31-38.
41. Maklakov, A.A., Bilde, T. & Lubin, Y. 2006. Inter-sexual combat and resource allocation into body parts in the spider, Stegodyphus lineatus. Ecol. Entomol. 31: 564-567.
42. Martin, O.Y. & Hosken, D.J. 2003. Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. Evolution 57: 2765-2772.
43. Molbo, D., Machados, C.A., Herre, E.A. & Keller, L. 2004. Inbreeding and population structure in two pairs of cryptic fig wasp species. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1613-1623.
44. Morrow, E.H. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270: 2377-2381.
45. Morrow, E.H., Arnqvist, G. & Pitnick, S. 2003. Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 14: 802-806.
46. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum, eds), pp. 123-166. Academic Press, New York.
47. Parker, G.A. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating an fertilisation: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 361: 235-259.
48. Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2005. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sib mating. Evolution 59: 317-323.
49. Queller, D.C. 1992. Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 139: 540-558.
50. Queller, D.C. 1994a. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol. Ecol. 8: 70-73.
51. Queller, D.C. 1994b. Male-female conflict and parent-offspring conflict. Am. Nat. 144: S84-S99.
52. Queller, D.C. 1997. Why do females care more than males? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 264: 1555.
53. Rankin, D.J. & Kokko, H. 2006. Sex, death and tragedy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 225-226.
54. Rankin, D.J., Bargum, K. & Kokko, H. 2007. The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 643-651.
55. Reinhardt, K., Naylor, R. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2003. Reducing the cost of traumatic insemination: female bedbugs evolve a unique organ. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2371-2375.
56. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
57. Rice, W.R. 2000. Dangerous Liaisons. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 21: 12953-12955.
58. Stutt, A.D. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98: 5683-5687.
59. Taylor, P.D. 1992. Altruism in viscous populations - an inclusive fitness model. Evol. Ecol. 6: 352-356.
60. Taylor, P.D. & Frank, S.A. 1996. How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 180.
61. Taylor, P.D., Wild, G. & Gardner, A. 2007. Direct fitness versus inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection? J. Evol. Biol. 20: 301-309.
62. Trivers, R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (B. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136-179. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL.
63. Úbeda, F. & Gardner, A. in press. A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: juveniles. Evolution, doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01115.x.
64. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73: 43-78.
65. Waser, P.M., Austad, S.N. & Keane, B. 1986. When should animals tolerate inbreeding? Am. Nat. 128: 529-537.
66. West, S.A. 2009. Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
67. West, S.A. & Buckling, A. 2003. Cooperation, virulence and siderophore production in bacterial parasites. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 37-44.
68. West, S.A., Murray, M.G., Machado, C.A., Griffin, A.S. & Herre, E.A. 2001. Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives. Nature 409: 510-513.
69. West, S.A., Pen, I. & Griffin, A.S. 2002a. Conflict and cooperation - cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296: 72-75.
70. West, S.A., Penn, I. & Griffin, A.S. 2002b. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296: 72-75.
71. West, S.A., Gardner, A., Shuker, D.M., Reynolds, T., Burton-Chellow, M., Sykes, E.M., Guinnee, M.A. & Griffin, A.S. 2006. Cooperation and the scale of competition in humans. Curr. Biol. 16: 1103-1106.
72. West, S.A., Griffin, A.S. & Gardner, A. 2007. Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr. Biol. 17: R661-R672.
73. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58: 1028-1037.
74. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.