Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1771, 2013, Pages

  Tan, Cedric K W ^a   Løvlie, Hanne ^a,b   Greenway, Elisabeth ^a   Goodwin, Stephen F ^a   Pizzari, Tommaso ^a   Wigby, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Coolidge effect; Drosophila melanogaster; Genetic relatedness; Individual recognition; Orco

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; FLY; MATING SUCCESS; OLFACTION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; ASSOCIATION; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; CUES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS; SMELL;

EID: 84899043305     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1691     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Dewsbury DA. 1981 Effects of novelty of copulatory behavior: the Coolidge effect and related phenomena. Psychol. Bull. 89, 464-482. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.3.464)
2. Koene JM, Ter Maat A. 2007 Coolidge effect in pond snails: male motivation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 212. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-212)
3. Bateman AJ. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368. (doi:10.1038/ hdy.1948.21)
4. Jones AG, Ratterman NL. 2009 Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10001-10008. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0901129106)
5. Fox CW, Rauter CM. 2003 Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 273-286.
6. Nunn CL. 2002 A comparative study of leukocyte counts and disease risk in primates. Evolution 56, 177-190.
7. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS. 2002 Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296, 72-75. (doi:10.1126/science.1065507)
8. Rankin DJ. 2011 Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 71-81. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02143.x)
9. Perrin N, Mazalov V. 2000 Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Am. Nat. 155, 116-127. (doi:10.1086/ 303296)
10. Wild G, Pizzari T, West SA. 2011 Sexual conflict in viscous populations: the effect of the timing of dispersal. Theor. Popul. Biol. 80, 298-316. (doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2011.09.002)
11. Imhof M, Harr B, Brem G, Schlötterer C. 1998 Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 7, 915-917. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x. 1998.00382.x)
12. Mcinnis DO, Schaffer HE, Mettler LE. 1982 Field dispersal and population sizes of native Drosophila from North Carolina. Am. Nat. 119, 319-330. (doi:10.1086/283912)
13. Robinson SP, Kennington WJ, Simmons LW. 2012 Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 215, 716-725. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02466.x)
14. Vosshall LB, Hansson BS. 2011 A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor. Chem. Senses 36, 497-498. (doi:10.1093/chemse/bjr022)
15. Spiess EB. 1987 Discrimination among prospective mates in Drosophila. In Kin recognition in animals (eds JC Fletcher, CD Michener), pp. 77-119. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Partridge L, Farquhar M. 1983 Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim. Behav. 31, 871-877. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80242-5)
17. Broughton SJ et al. 2005 Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3105-3110. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0405775102)
18. Larsson MC, Domingos AI, Jones WD, Chiappe ME, Amrein H, Vosshall LB. 2004 Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703-714. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019)
19. Clancy DJ, Kennington WJ. 2001 A simple method to achieve consistent larval density in bottle cultures. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 84, 168-169.
20. Nilsen SP, Chan YB, Huber R, Kravitz EA. 2004 Gender-selective patterns of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12342-12347. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0404693101)
21. Spieth HT. 1966 Drosophilid mating behaviour: the behaviour of decapitated females. Anim. Behav. 14, 226-235. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(66)80076-3)
22. Bastock M, Manning A. 1955 The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8, 85-111. (doi:10.1163/156853955X00184)
23. Connolly K, Cook R. 1973 Rejection responses by female Drosophila melanogaster: their ontogeny, causality and effects upon behavior of courting males. Behaviour 44, 142-166. (doi:10.1163/ 156853973X00364)
24. Finley KD, Taylor BJ, Milstein M, McKeown M. 1997 Dissatisfaction, a gene involved in sex-specific behavior and neural development of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 913-918. (doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.913)
25. Cox DR. 1972 Regression models and life-tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 34, 187-220.
26. Bretman A, Fricke C, Chapman T. 2009 Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1705-1711. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1878)
27. Kowalski S, Aubin T, Martin JR. 2004 Courtship song in Drosophila melanogaster: a differential effect on male-female locomotor activity. Can. J. Zool. 82, 1258-1266. (doi:10.1139/z04-102)
28. Steck K, Velt D, Grandy R, Badia SBI, Mathews Z, Verschure P, Hansson BS, Knaden M. 2012 A highthroughput paradigm for Drosophila olfaction: the flywalk. Sci. Rep. 2, 361. (doi:10.1038/srep00361)
29. Smith BH. 1983 Recognition of female kin by male bees through olfactory signals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4551-4553. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 80.14.4551)
30. Trott AR, Donelson NC, Griffith LC, Ejima A. 2012 Song choice is modulated by female movement in Drosophila males. PLoS ONE 7, e46025. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046025)
31. Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Løvlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR. 2003 Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426, 70-74. (doi:10.1038/ nature02004)
32. Steiger S, Franz R, Eggert AK, Muller JK. 2008 The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1831-1838. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0375)
33. Brown JL. 1997 A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8, 60-65. (doi:10. 1093/beheco/8.1.60)
34. Saltz JB, Alicuben ET, Grubman J, Harkenrider M, Megowan N, Nuzhdin SV. 2012 Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2270-2281. (doi:10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05518.x)
35. Billeter J-C, Jagadeesh S, Stepek N, Azanchi R, Levine JD. 2012 Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2417-2425. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2676)
36. Odeen A, Moray CM. 2008 Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies. Naturwissenschaften 95, 253-256. (doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0314-3)
37. Partridge L. 1988 The rare-male effect: what is its evolutionary significance? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 319, 525-539. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1988.0063)
38. Knoppien P. 1985 Rare male mating advantage: a review. Biol. Rev. 60, 81-117. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00418.x)
39. Fedorka KM, Zuk M. 2005 Sexual conflict and female immune suppression in the cricket, Allonemobious socius. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1515-1522. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00942.x)
40. Ala-Honkola O, Friman E, Lindström K. 2011 Costs and benefits of polyandry in a placental poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa are in accordance with the parent-offspring conflict theory of placentation. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2600-2610. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02383.x)
41. MacBean I, Parsons P. 1967 Directional selection for duration of copulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 56, 233-239.
42. Goodwin SF, Rideout EJ, Dornan AJ, Neville MC, Eadie S. 2010 Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Neurosci. 13, U458-U479. (doi:10.1038/nn.2515)
43. Cook R, Cook A. 1975 The attractiveness to males of female Drosophila melanogaster: effects of mating, age and diet. Anim. Behav. 23, 521-526. (doi:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90129-3)
44. Casares P, Carracedo MC, Pineiro R, Miguel ES, Garciaflorez L. 1992 Genetic basis for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster: a diallel study. Heredity 69, 400-411. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.142)
45. Alcock J. 1994 Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 1-21. (doi:10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000245)
46. Shorey HH. 1976 Animal communication by pheromones. New York, NY: Academic Press.
47. Hildebrand JG, Shepherd GM. 1997 Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 595-631. (doi:10.1146/annurev. neuro.20.1.595)
48. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries RE, Robertson DH, Cavaggioni A, Beynon RJ. 2001 Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414, 631-634. (doi:10.1038/414631a)
49. Johnston RE, Bullock TA. 2001 Individual recognition by use of odours in golden hamsters: the nature of individual representations. Anim. Behav. 61, 545-557. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1637)
50. Tibbetts EA. 2002 Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1423-1428. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2031)
51. Barrows EM, Bell WJ, Michener CD. 1975 Individual odor differences and their social functions in insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 7, 2824-2828. (doi:10.1073/pnas.72.7.2824)
52. Bretman A, Westmancoat JD, Gage MJG, Chapman T. 2011 Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals. Curr. Biol. 21, 617-622. (doi:10.1016/j. cub.2011.03.008)
53. Mery F, Varela SAM, Danchin É, Blanchet S, Parejo D, Coolen I, Wagner RH. 2009 Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate. Curr. Biol. 19, 730-734. (doi:10.1016/ j.cub.2009.02.064)
54. Rouault J-C, Marican C, Wicker-Thomas C, Jallon J-C. 2004 Relations between cuticular hydrocarbon (HC) polymorphism, resistance against desiccation and breeding temperature; a model for HC evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetica 120, 195-212. (doi:10.1023/B:GENE.0000017641. 75820.49)
55. William J, Etges WJ, Oliveira CCD, Ritchie MG, Noor MAF. 2009 Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis: II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and g e interactions. Evolution 63, 1712-1730. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009. 00661.x)
56. Ingleby FC, Hosken DJ, Flowers K, Hawkes MF, Lane SM, Rapkin J, Dworkin I, Hunt J. 2013 Genotype-by-environment interactions for cuticular hydrocarbon expression in Drosophila simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 94-107. (doi:10.1111/ jeb.12030)