Minimal search as a restriction on Merge

Lingua

Volumn 156, Issue , 2015, Pages 57-69

  Larson, Bradley ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921466401     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abels K. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding 2003, (Dissertation), University of Connecticut.
2. Abels K. Right node raising: ellipsis or across the board movement?. Proceedings of NELS 34 2004, 45-59. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. K. Moulton, M. Wolf (Eds.).
3. Abrusán M. Weak Island Semantics 2014, vol. 3. Oxford University Press.
4. Agbayani B., Zoerner E. Gapping, pseudogapping and sideward movement. Stud. Linguistica 2004, 58(3):185-211.
5. Assmann A. Deriving parasitic gaps by fission und fusion. Proceedings of ConSOLE XIX 2012, 49-75. E. Boone, K. Linke, M. Schulpen (Eds.).
6. Bachrach A., Katzir R. Right node raising and delayed spellout. InterPhases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces 2009, 283-316. Oxford University Press. K.K. Grohmann (Ed.).
7. Blevins J. Syntactic Complexity: Evidence for Discontinuity and Multi-Domination 1990, (Dissertation), University of Massachusetts.
8. Bobaljik J.D. In terms of merge: copy and head movement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 1995, vol. 27:41-64. MITWPL.
9. Bobaljik J.D., Brown S. Interarboreal operations: head movement and the extension requirement. Linguistic Inq. 1997, 28:345-356.
10. Boeckx C. Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons From Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies 2008, Blackwell, Oxford.
11. Boeckx C. Some reflections on Darwin's Problem in the context of Cartesian biolinguistics. The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty 2011, 42-64. Oxford University Press. A.M. Di Sciullo, C. Boeckx (Eds.).
12. Bolhuis J.J., Tattersall I., Chomsky N., Berwick R.C. How could language have evolved?. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12(8):e1001934.
13. Bošković Ž. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 2002, 5:167-218.
14. Castillo J.C., Drury J., Grohmann K.K. Merge over move and the extended projection principle: MOM and the EPP revisited. Iberia 2009, 1:53-114.
15. Chen-Main J. On the Generation and Linearization of Multi-Dominance Structures 2006, (Dissertation), John Hopkins University.
16. Chomsky N. Conditions on transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle 1973, 232-286. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York. R. Anderson, P. Kiparsky (Eds.).
17. Chomsky N. Barriers 1986, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Chomsky N. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. Step-by-Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik 2000, 89-156. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (Eds.).
20. Chomsky N. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language 2001, 1-52. MIT Press. M. Kenstowicz (Ed.).
21. Chomsky N. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inq. 2005, 36(1):1-22.
22. Chomsky N. On phases. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud 2008, 133-166. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R. Freidin, C.P. Otero, M.L. Zubizaretta (Eds.).
23. Chomsky N. Problems of projection. Lingua 2013, 130:33-49.
24. Chomsky N. Class Lecture April 2014, MIT.
25. Chung D.-H. Multiple dominance analysis of right node raising constructions. Lang. Res. 2004, 40:791-812.
26. Citko B. On the nature of merge: external merge, internal merge, and parallel merge. Linguistic Inq. 2005, 36(4):475-496.
27. Citko B., Gračanin-Yuksek M. Towards a new typology of coordinated wh-questions. J. Linguistics 2013, 49(1):1-32.
28. Epstein S. Unprincipled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. Working Minimalism 1999, 317-346. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Epstein, D. Seely (Eds.).
29. Epstein S.D., Kitahara H., Seely T.D. Structure building that can't be. Ways of Structure Building 2012, 253-270. Oxford University Press. M. Urriba-Etxebarria, V. Valmala (Eds.).
30. Fernández-Salgueiro G. Deriving the CSC and unifying ATB and PG constructions through sideward movement. Proceedings of the 26th WCCFL 2008, 156-162. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA. C.B. Chang, H.J. Haynie (Eds.).
31. Franks S., Lavine J. Case and word order in Lithuanian. J. Linguistics 2006, 42:239-288.
32. Gracanin-Yuksek M. About Sharing 2007, (Dissertation), MIT.
33. Grohmann K., Markus P., Tobias S., Michael S., Neven W. The Apex Paradox: a technical issue for the explanation of main clause phenomena. Presented at GIST 2: Main Clause Phenomena 2010.
34. Guimarães M. Derivation and Representation of Syntactic Amalgams 2004, (Dissertation), University of Maryland.
35. Henry A. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
36. Hornstein N. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal 2001, Blackwell, Oxford.
37. Hornstein N. A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar 2009, Cambridge University Press.
38. Johnson K. LCA+alignment=RNR. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Coordination, Subordination and Ellipsis 2007.
39. Johnson K. Recoverability of Deletion 2012, (Manuscript), University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
40. Johnson K. Licensing Ellipsis 2013, (Manuscript), University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
41. Kayne R. Connectedness. Linguistic Inq. 1983, 14:223-249.
42. Kayne R. The Antisymmetry of Syntax 1994, vol. 25. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Kearney K. Governing Categories 1983, (Manuscript), University of Connecticut.
44. Kluck M. Sentence Amalgamation 2011, LOT Dissertation Series, Utrecht.
45. Kluck M. A Sluicing Account of Amalgams 2014, (Manuscript), University of Groningen.
46. Lakoff G. Syntactic amalgams. Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1974, 321-344. University of Chicago, Chicago. M. Galy, R. Fox, A. Bruck (Eds.).
47. Larson B. Agnostic movement in Malagasy focused predicates. Proceedings of the 24th NWLC 2008, 9-16. S. Moran, D.S. Tanner, M. Scanlon (Eds.).
48. Larson B. The Syntax of Non-Syntactic Dependencies 2013, (Dissertation), University of Maryland.
49. Larson B. Not-so-across-the-board movement in Macedonian. Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) 2013, vol. 21:120-133. Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, MI.
50. Lewis S., Larson B., Kush D. What and when can you fill a gap with something. Presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference 2012.
51. McCawley J. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inq. 1982, 13:91-106.
52. McCloskey J. Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics: A Case Study in Modern Irish 1979, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
53. McCloskey J. The morphosyntax of Wh-extraction in Irish. J. Linguistics 2001, 37:67-100.
54. Munn A.B. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures 1993, (Dissertation), The University of Maryland.
55. Nissenbaum J.W. Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement 2000, (Dissertation), MIT.
56. Nunes J. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inq. 2001, 32(2):303-344.
57. Nunes J. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs) 2004, vol. 43. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. Ojeda A.E. Discontinuity, multidominance, and unbounded dependency in generalized phrase structure grammar: some preliminaries in discontinuous constituency. Syntax Semant. 1987, 20:257-282.
59. Parker D., Larson B. Two flavors of long distance dependency discerned through island effects. Talk Presented at the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing 2013, University of South Carolina.
60. Pesetsky D., Torrego E. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation 2007, 262-294. John Benjamins. S. Karimi, V. Samiian, W.K. Wilkins (Eds.).
61. Richards M.D. On feature inheritance: an argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inq. 2007, 38(3):563-572.
62. van Riemsdijk H. Grafts follow from merge. Phases of Interpretation (Studies in Generative Grammar 91) 2006, 17-44. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. F. Mara (Ed.).
63. Shima E. A preference for Move over Merge. Linguistic Inq. 2000, 31(2):375-385.
64. Tattersall I. The Origin of the Human Capacity 1998, American Museum of Natural History, New York.
65. Torrego E. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inq. 1984, 15:103-129.
66. de Vries M. Merge: properties and boundary conditions. Linguistics Neth. 2005, 22:219-230.
67. de Vries M. Parenthetical main clauses or not?. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons 2012, 177-190. John Benjamins. L. Aelbrecht, L. Haegeman, R. Nye (Eds.).
68. Wilder C. Right node raising and the LCA. Proceedings of WCCFL 1999, vol. 18. Cascadilla Press, Somerville MA.