Merge: Properties and boundary conditions

Linguistics in the Netherlands

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 219-230

  De Vries, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248693419     PISSN: 09297332     EISSN: 15699919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/avt.22.20vri     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bobaljik, J. (1995) ‘In Terms of Merge: Copy and Head Movement. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27, 41-64.
2. Bobaljik, J. & S. Brown (1997) ‘Interarboreal Operations: Head Movement and the Extension Requirement’. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 345-356.
3. Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
4. Di Sciullo, A.-M. (2000) Asymmetries: Consequences for Morphological Configurations and Paradigms’. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47, 81-101.
5. Epstein, S. (1999) ‘Un-principled Syntax and the Derivation of Syntactic Relations’. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein, eds., Working minimalism. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
6. Frampton, J. (2004) ‘Copies, traces, occurrences, and all that: Evidence from Bulgarian multiple wh-phenomena’. Ms. Northeastern University.
7. Fukui, N. & Y. Takano (1998) ‘Symmetry in Syntax: Merge and Demerge’. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 27-86.
8. Gärtner, H.-M. (2002) Generalized Transformations and Beyond: Reflections on Minimalist Syntax. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.
9. Haider, H. (1994) ‘Detached Clauses — The Later the Deeper’. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, # 41, University of Stuttgart.
10. Kayne, R. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
11. Koster, J. (1999) ‘De primaire structuur’. TABU 29: 131-140.
12. Koster, J. (2004) ‘Structure Preservingness, Internal Merge, and the Strict Locality of Triads. Ms. University of Groningen.
13. Langendoen, T. (2003) ‘Merge’. In A. Carnie et al., eds., Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. In Honor of Eloise Jelinek. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 307-318.
14. McCawley, J. (1982) ‘Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91-106.
15. Nunes, J. (2001) ‘Sideward Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 303-344.
16. Riemsdijk, H. van (1998) ‘Trees and Scions — Science and Trees’. In Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest-Web-Page. http://cognet.mit.edu/Books/celebration/essays/riemsdyk. html
17. Vries, M. de (2004) ‘Parataxis as a Different Type of Asymmetric Merge’ Proceedings of IPSI-2004, Pescara. Interfaces Conference, hosted by the International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems, and Interdisciplinary Research, 21 pp. CD-ROM, ISBN: 86-7466-117-3.
18. Vries, M. de (2005) ‘Ellipsis in nevenschikking: voorwaarts deleren, maar achterwaarts del-en. TABU 34, 13-46.
19. Zhang, N. (2004) ‘Move is Remerge’. Language and Linguistics 5, 189-209.
20. Zwart, J.-W. (2004a) ‘Een dynamische structuur van de Nederlandse zin. TABU 33, 55-71.
21. Zwart, J.-W. (2004b) ‘Local Agreement. Ms. University of Groningen.