Rhetorical Questions and Wh-Movement

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 563-572

  Richards, Marc D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548156788     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
3. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In The cartography of syntactic structures. Vol. 3, Structures and beyond, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Originally appeared as MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL (2001).
5. Chomsky, Noam. 2005. On phases. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
6. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Collins, Chris. 2002. Eliminating labels. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 42-64. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Epstein, Samuel David, and T. Daniel Seely. 2002. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and T. Daniel Seely, 65-89. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1991. On the subject of infinitives. In CLS 27, ed. by Lise M. Dobrin, Lynn Nichols, and Rosa M. Rodriguez, 324-343. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
10. Reprinted with minor revisions in Howard Lasnik. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Müller, Gereon. 2004. Phrase impenetrability and wh-intervention. In Minimality effects in syntax, ed. by Arthur Stepanov, Gisbert Fanselow, and Ralf Vogel, 289-325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Postal, Paul. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. Richards, Marc. 2004. Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
14. Richards, Marc. 2006. On phases, phase heads, and functional categories. Ms., University of Cambridge.
15. Richards, Norvin. 1999. Featural cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiers. In Working minimalism, ed. by Samuel David Epstein and Norbert Hornstein, 127-158. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Svenonius, Peter. 2001. Impersonal passives: A phase-based analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, ed. by Arthur Holmer, Jan Olof Svantesson, and Åke Viberg, 109-125. Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund 39.2. Lund: Lund University.
18. Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In Peripheries, ed. by David Adger, Cécile de Cat, and George Tsoulas, 259-287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.