Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 53, Issue , 2015, Pages 78-89

  Feng, Chenpeng ^a,b   Chu, Feng ^b   Ding, Jingjing ^c   Bi, Gongbing ^a   Liang, Liang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EVRY   (France)

^c HEFEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation; Compensation scheme; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Gross Domestic Product (GDP); Two step method

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION;

ALLOCATION PLANS; CARBON EMISSION ABATEMENT ALLOCATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; CENTRALISED; COMPENSATION SCHEME; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSE; EMISSION ABATEMENT; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTS; TWO STEP METHOD;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84921459774     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arabi B., Munisamy S., Emrouznejad A. A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist-Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. OMEGA 2015, 51:29-37.
2. Asmild M., Paradi J.C., Pastor J.T. Centralized resource allocation BCC models. OMEGA 2009, 37(1):40-49.
3. Asmild M., Paradi J.C., Pastor J.T. DEA based models for reallocations of police personnel. OR Spectrum 2012, 34(4):921-941.
4. Athanassopoulos A.D. Decision support services in multiunit and multilevel systems for target-based resource allocation of public. Management Science 1998, 44(2):173-187.
5. Athanassopoulos A.D. Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities. European Journal of Operational Research 1995, 87(3):535-550.
6. Aumann R.J., Maschler M. Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory 1985, 36(2):195-213.
7. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30(9):1078-1092.
8. Baumgärtner S., Dyckhoff H., Faber M., Proops J., Schiller J. The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecological Economics 2001, 36(3):365-372.
9. Beasley J. Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 147(1):198-216.
10. Bi G.B., Ding J.J., Luo Y., Liang L. Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2011, 35(9):4270-4280.
11. Bretholt A., Pan J.N. Evolving the latent variable model as an environmental DEA technology. OMEGA 2013, 41(2):315-325.
12. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2(6):429-444.
13. Cherchye L., De Rock B., Dierynck B., Roodhooft F., Sabbe J. Opening the "black box" of efficiency measurement: input allocation in multioutput settings. Operations Research 2013, 61(5):1148-1165.
14. Chiu Y.H., Lin J.C., Su W.N., Liu J.K. An efficiency evaluation of the EU[U+05F3]s allocation of carbon emission allowances. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2015, 10(2):192-200.
15. Chung Y.H., Färe R., Grosskopf S. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function method. Journal of Environmental Management 1997, 51(3):229-240.
16. Cook W.D., Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192(1):1-17.
17. Cook W.D., Tone K., Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. OMEGA 2014, 44:1-4.
18. Debreu G. The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 1951, 19(3):273-292.
19. Fang L. Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths. OMEGA 2015, 51:24-28.
20. Farrell M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1957, 120(3):253-281.
21. Färe R., Grabowski R., Grosskopf S., Kraft S. Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: a non-parametric approach. Economic Letters 1997, 56(2):187-193.
22. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Hernandez-Sancho F. Environmental performance: an index number method. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26(4):343-352.
23. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K., Pasurka C. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric method. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1989, 71(1):90-98.
24. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Tyteca D. An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms-application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological economics 1996, 18(2):161-175.
25. Golany B., Tamir E. Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs: a data envelopment analysis approach. Management Science 1995, 41(7):1172-1184.
26. Gomes E.G., Lins M.P.E. Modeling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2008, 59(5):616-623.
27. Guo R., Cao X.J., Yang X.Y., Li Y.K., Jiang D.H., Li F.T. The strategy of energy-related carbon emission reduction in Shanghai. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):633-638.
28. Hua Z.S., Bian Y.W., Liang L. Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: an extended DEA approach. OMEGA 2007, 35(5):578-587.
29. Karsu Ö., Morton A. Incorporating balance concerns in resource allocation decisions: a bi-criteria modelling approach. OMEGA 2014, 44:70-82.
30. Korhonen P., Syrjänen M. Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis. Management Science 2004, 50(8):1134-1144.
31. Liu J.S., Lu L.Y.Y., Lu W.M., Lin B.J.Y. A survey of DEA applications. OMEGA 2013, 41(5):893-902.
32. Lozano S., Villa G., Adenso-Diaz B. Centralised target setting for regional recycling operations using DEA. OMEGA 2004, 32(2):101-110.
33. Lozano S., Villa G., Brännlund R. Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 193(3):752-760.
34. Lozano S., Villa G. Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2004, 22(1-2):143-161.
35. Mandell M.B. Modeling effectiveness-equity trade-offs in public service delivery systems. Management Science 1991, 37(4):467-482.
36. Moreno-Ternero J.D. A new analysis of a simple model of fair allocation. Economics Letters 2013, 118(2):393-395.
37. O'Neill B. A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences 1982, 2(4):345-371.
38. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 142(1):16-20.
39. Sun J., Wu J., Liang L., Zhong R.Y., Huang G.Q. Allocation of emission permits using DEA: centralised and individual points of view. International Journal of Production Research 2014, 52(2):419-435.
40. Tyteca D. Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms-concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1997, 8(2):183-197.
41. Wu H.Q., Du S.F., Liang L., Zhou Y.F.A. DEA based method for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2013, 58(5-6):1095-1101.
42. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Han J.Y. Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics 2010, 32(1):194-201.
43. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 189(1):1-18.
44. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics 2008, 30(1):1-14.
45. 2 emission reduction quota trading in China. Applied Energy 2013, 112:1518-1528.
46. 2 emissions form OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics 2001, 23(1):63-83.