A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 58, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 1095-1101

  Wu, Huaqing ^a   Du, Shaofu ^b   Liang, Liang ^b   Zhou, Yafang ^a  

^a HEFEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Bargaining game; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Eco efficiency; Emission permits

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL GREENHOUSE; BARGAINING GAME; CURRENT EMISSIONS; DECISION MAKING UNIT; ECO-EFFICIENCY; EMISSION PERMITS; OPERATION EFFICIENCIES; OVERALL EFFICIENCY;

COMMERCE; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; GAME THEORY; GREENHOUSE GASES; OPTIMIZATION;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84880606246     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2012.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Smith P., Martino D., Cai Z. Agriculture. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
2. Goulder L.H., Parry I.A.W., Williams I.R.C., Burtraw D. The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics 1999, 72:329-360.
3. Åhman M., Burtraw D., Kruger J., Zetterberg L. A ten-year rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1718-1730.
4. Neuhoff K., Keats Martínez K., Sato M. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector. Climate Policy 2006, 6:73-91.
5. Amirteimoori A., Kordrostami S. Allocating fixed costs and target setting: a DEA-based approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005, 171:136-151.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
7. Cook W.D., Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192:1-17.
8. Li Y.J., Yang F., Liang L., Hua Z.S. Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: a DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:389-401.
9. Cook W.D., Kress M. Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 1999, 119:652-661.
10. Cook W.D., Zhu J. Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach. Computers & Operations Research 2005, 32:2171-2178.
11. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30(8):1078-1092.
12. Amirteimoori A., Shafiei M. Characterizing an equitable omission of shared resources: a DEA-based approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2006, 177:18-23.
13. Beasley J.E. Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 147:198-216.
14. Amirteimoori A., Kordrostami S. Allocating fixed costs and target setting: a DEA-based approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005, 171:136-151.
15. Lozano S., Villa G. Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2004, 22:143-161.
16. Asmild M., Paradi J.C., Pastor J.T. Centralized resource allocation BCC models. OMEGA 2009, 37:40-49.
17. Gomes E.G., Lins M.P.E. Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2008, 59:616-623.
18. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Tyteca D. An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms-application to fossil fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:161-175.
19. Scheel H. Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 132:400-410.
20. Seiford L., Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 142:16-20.
21. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. European Journal of Operational Research 2004, 157:242-245.
22. Liang L., Wu J., Cook W.D., Zhu J. The DEA game cross efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research 2008, 56(5):1278-1288.
23. Wu J., Liang L., Yang F., Yan H. Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36(3):4357-4362.
24. Leip A., Dämmgen U., Kuikman P., Van Amstel A. The quality of European (EU-15) greenhouse gas inventories from agriculture. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2005, 2(2):177-192.
25. Eurostat, Agricultural Statistics: Main Results of 2008-09 2010, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), Climate change 2007: synthesis report summary for policymakers, 2007. (accessed on 20.04.2011). http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/spm.html.
27. Golany B., Roll Y. An application procedure for DEA. Omega 1989, 17(3):237-250.
28. Zhang J.J., Nie T.F., Du S.F. Optimal emission-dependent production policy with stochastic demand. International Journal of Society Systems Science 2011, 3(1/2):21-39.