Incorporating balance concerns in resource allocation decisions: A bi-criteria modelling approach

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 70-82

  Karsu, Özlem ^a   Morton, Alec ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allocation; Decision making process; Mathematical programming; Multicriteria

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ALLOCATION; BI-CRITERIA; DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; MODELING APPROACH; MULTI-CRITERIA; PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEMS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION DECISION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROBLEM; SCIENCE FUNDINGS; SOLUTION ALGORITHMS;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84887790949     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. Portfolio Management for New Products 2001, Perseus Publishing. 2nd Edition.
2. Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A. Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 172:1018-1039.
3. Morton A, Keisler J, Salo A. Multicriteria portfolio decision analysis for project selection. Technical Report, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSEOR 13.141; 2013.
4. Swaminathan J.M. Decision support for allocating scarce drugs. Interfaces 2003, 33(2):1-11.
5. Earnshaw S.R., Hicks K., Richter A., Honeycutt A. A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies. a pilot study. Health Care Management Science 2007, 10(3):239-252.
6. Wang L., Fang L., Hipel K.W. On achieving fairness in the allocation of scarce resources. measurable principles and multiple objective optimization approaches. IEEE Systems Journal 2007, 1(1):17-28.
7. Ogryczak W., Wierzbicki a., Milewski M. A multi-criteria approach to fair and efficient bandwidth allocation. Omega 2008, 36(3):451-463.
8. Eiselt H., Marianov V. Employee positioning and workload allocation. Computers & Operations Research 2008, 35(2):513-524.
9. Bell J.E., Griffis S.E., Cunningham W.a., Eberlan J.a. Location optimization of strategic alert sites for homeland defense. Omega 2011, 39(2):151-158.
10. Golabi K., Kirkwood C.W., Sicherman A. Selecting a portfolio of solar energy projects using multiattribute preference theory. Management Science 1981, 27:174-189.
11. Hall N., Hershey J., Kessler L., Stotts R. A model for making project funding decisions at the National Cancer Institute. Operations Research 1992, 40:1040-1052.
12. Ghasemzadeh F., Archer N., Iyogun P. A zero-one model for project portfolio selection and scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1999, 50:745-755.
13. Beaujon G.J., Marin S.P., McDonald G.C. Balancing and optimizing a portfolio of R&D projects. Naval Research Logistics 2001, 48(1):18-40.
14. Dickinson M., Thornton A.C., Graves S. Technology portfolio management. optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2001, 48(4):518-527.
15. Stewart T.J., Joubert A., Janssen R. MCDA framework for fishing rights allocation in South Africa. Group Decision and Negotiation 2010, 19(3):247-265.
16. Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A. R&D project evaluation. an integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega 2008, 36(5):895-912.
17. Wang J., Hwang W.-L. A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega 2007, 35(3):247-257.
18. Hassanzadeh F., Collan M., Modarres M. A technical note on "A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model" by Wang and Hwang (2007). Omega 2011, 39(4):464-465.
19. Farquhar P.H., Rao V.R. A balance model for evaluating subsets of multiattributed items. Management Science 1976, 22(5):528-539.
20. Rao V.R., Mahajan V., Varaiya N.P. A balance model for evaluating firms for acquisition. Management Science 1991, 37(3):331-349.
21. Chien C., Sainfort F. Evaluating the desirability of meals: an illustrative multiattribute decision analysis procedure to assess portfolios with interdependent items. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 1998, 7:230-238.
22. Chien C. A portfolio-evaluation framework for selecting R&D projects. R&D Management 2002, 32(4):359-368.
23. Stewart T.J. A multi-criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 1991, 42(1):17-26.
24. Wierzbicki A. Reference point approaches. Multicriteria decision making. advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications 1999, 9.1-9.39. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. T. Gal, T. Stewart, T. Hanne (Eds.).
25. Klapka J., Pinos P. Decision support system for multicriterial R&D and information systems projects selection. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 140:434-446.
26. Sen A. On economic inequality 1973, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
27. Bollapragada S., Garbiras M. Scheduling commercials on broadcast television. Operations Research 2004, 52(3):337-345.
28. Glover F. Improved linear integer programming formulations of nonlinear integer programs. Management Science 1975, 22(4):455-460.
29. Adams W., Forrester R.J. Linear forms of nonlinear expressions. Operations Research Letters 2007, 35:510-518.
30. Kellerer H., Pferschy U., Pisinger D. Knapsack problems 2004, Springer, Berlin.
31. Ehrgott M., Gandibleux X. Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys 2002, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
32. Laumanns M., Lothar T., Eckart Z. An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 169:932-942.
33. Czyzak P., Jaszkiewicz A. Pareto simulated annealing metaheuristic technique for multiple-objective combinatorial optimization. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 1998, 7:34-47.