Differentiating mixed- and high-severity fire regimes in mixed-conifer forests of the Canadian Cordillera

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 341, Issue , 2015, Pages 45-58

  Marcoux, Hélène M ^a   Daniels, Lori D ^a   Gergel, Sarah E ^a   Da Silva, Eric ^b   Gedalof, Ze'ev ^b   Hessburg, Paul F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Fire exclusion; Fire history; Forest age structure; Larix occidentalis; Snag dynamics; Stand dynamics

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DYNAMICS; FIRE HAZARDS; FIRES; REFORESTATION;

FIRE EXCLUSION; FIRE HISTORY; FOREST AGE STRUCTURES; LARIX OCCIDENTALIS; SNAG DYNAMICS; STAND DYNAMICS;

FORESTRY;

AGE STRUCTURE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; CONIFEROUS TREE; CORDILLERA; DISTURBANCE; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; FIRE BEHAVIOR; FIRE HISTORY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HETEROGENEITY; STAND DYNAMICS; STAND STRUCTURE;

FIRES; RESTORATION; STRUCTURES;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA;

ABIES LASIOCARPA; CONIFEROPHYTA; LARIX OCCIDENTALIS; PINUS CONTORTA; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 84921445919     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Agee J.K. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests 1993, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
2. Agee J.K. The landscape ecology of western forest fire regimes. Northwest Sci. 1998, 72:24-34.
3. Aho, K., 2011. asbio: A Collection of Statistical Tools for Biologists. R Package Version 0.3-39. (last accessed 01.07.13).
4. Amoroso M.M., Daniels L.D., Bataineh M., Andison D.W. Evidence of mixed-severity fires in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains of west-central Alberta, Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:2240-2249.
5. Andison D.W. The influence of wildfire boundary delineation on our understanding of burning patterns in the Alberta foothills. Can. J. For. Res. 2012, 42:1253-1263.
6. Antos J.A., Parish R. Dynamics of an old-growth, fire-initiated, subalpine forest in southern interior British Columbia: tree size, age, and spatial structure. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32:1935-1946.
7. Arnett J.T., Coops N.C., Daniels L.D., Falls R.W. Detecting forest damage after a low-severity fire using remote sensing at multiple scales. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 2015, 35:239-246.
8. Axelson J.N., Alfaro R.I., Hawkes B.C. Influence of fire and mountain pine beetle on the dynamics of lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia, Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:1874-1882.
9. B.C. Ministry of Forests, 1995. Biodiversity Guidebook - Forest Practices Code of British Columbia. Victoria, B.C. (accessed 15.09.12). http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/biodiv/biotoc.htm.
10. B.C. Forest Analysis and Inventory, 2012. Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification (BEC) Map. GeoBC Data Discovery Services. Victoria, B.C. (accessed 10.05.10). http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hre/becweb/resources/maps/GISdataDownload.html.
11. Barrett S.W., Arno S.F. Indian fires as an ecological influence in the northern Rockies. J. Forest. 1982, 80:647-651.
12. Barrett S.W., Arno S.F., Key C.H. Fire regimes of western larch-lodgepole pine forests in Glacier National Park, Montana. Can. J. For. Res. 1991, 21:1711-1720.
13. Beaty R.M., Taylor A.H. Fire disturbance and forest structure in old-growth mixed conifer forests in the northern Sierra Nevada, California. J. Veg. Sci. 2007, 18:879-890.
14. Bekker M.F., Taylor A.H. Fire disturbance, forest structure, and stand dynamics in montane forests of the southern Cascades, Thousand Lakes Wilderness, California, USA. Écoscience 2010, 17:59-72.
15. Blackwell, B.A., Gray, R.W., Green, R.N., Feigl, F., Berry, T., Ohlson, D., Hawkes, B., 2003. Developing a Coarse Scale Approach to the Assessment of Forest Fuel Conditions in Southern British Columbia. Report Submitted to Forest Innovation Investment. Victoria, B.C.
16. Brown P.M. Climate effects on fire regimes and tree recruitment in Black Hills ponderosa pine forests. Ecology 2006, 87:2500-2510.
17. Brown P.M., Kaufmann M.R., Shepperd W.D. Long-term, landscape patterns of past fire events in a montane ponderosa pine forest of central Colorado. Landscape Ecol. 1999, 14:513-532.
18. Brown P.M., Wienk C.L., Symstad A.J. Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:1984-1999.
19. Cissel J.H., Swanson F.J., Weisberg P.J. Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:1217-1231.
20. Cochrane J., Daniels L.D. Striking a balance: safe sampling of partial stem cross-sections in British Columbia. J. Ecosyst. Manage. 2008, 9:38-46.
21. Collins B.M., Stephens S.L. Stand-replacing patches within a 'mixed severity' fire regime: quantitative characterization using recent fires in a long-established natural fire area. Landscape Ecol. 2010, 25:927-939.
22. Covington W.W., Moore M.M. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. J. Forest. 1994, 92:39-47.
23. Crotteau J.S., Varner M., Ritchie M.W. Post-fire regeneration across a fire severity gradient in the southern Cascades. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 287:103-112.
24. Cruz M.G., Butler B.W., Alexander M.E., Forthofer J.M., Wakimoto R.H. Predicting the ignition of crown fuels above a spreading surface fire. Part I: Model idealization. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2006, 15:47-60.
25. Curtis J.T., McIntosh R.P. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 1951, 31:476-496.
26. Da Silva, E., 2009. Wildfire History and its Relationship with Top-down and Bottom-up Controls in the Joseph and Gold Creek Watersheds, Kootenay Mountains, British Columbia. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Guelph, Guelph, O.N.
27. Daniels L.D., Maertens T.B., Stan A.B., McCloskey S.P.J., Cochrane J.D., Gray R.W. Direct and indirect impacts of climate change on forests: three case studies from British Columbia. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 33:108-116.
28. Demaerschalk J.P., Omule S.A. Estimating breast height diameters from stump measurements in British Columbia. Forest. Chron. 1982, 58:143-145.
29. Dietrich, J.H., 1980. The Composite Fire Interval - A Tool for More Accurate Interpretation of Fire History. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RM-GTR-81:8-14.
30. Doyle K.M., Knight D.H., Taylor D.L., Barmore W.J., Benedict J.M. Seventeen years of forest succession following the Waterfalls Canyon fire in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Int. J. Wildland Fire 1998, 8:45-55.
31. Duncan R. An evaluation of errors in tree age estimates based on increment cores in Kahikatea (Dacrycarpus dacrydioides). N. Z. Nat. Sci. 1989, 16:31-37.
32. Ehle D., Baker W. Disturbance and stand dynamics in ponderosa pine forests in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA. Ecol. Monogr. 2003, 73:543-566.
33. Environment Canada, 2011. Canadian Climate Normals 1971-2000: Cranbrook A (Station 1152102). Meteorological Service of Canada. (accessed 12.02.11). http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html.
34. Falk D., Miller D., McKenzie D., Black A.E. Cross-scale analysis of fire regimes. Ecosystems 2007, 10:809-823. 10.1007/s10021-007-9070-7.
35. Franklin J.F., Spies T.A., Pelt R.V., Carey A.B., Thornburgh D.A., Berg D.R., Lindenmayer D.B., Harmon M.E., Keeton W.S., Shaw D.C., Bible K., Chen J. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155:399-423.
36. Gass T.M., Robinson A.P. A hierarchical analysis of stand structure, composition, and burn patterns as indicators of stand age in an Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir forest. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37:884-894.
37. Gedalof Z.E., Peterson D.L., Mantua N.J. Atmospheric, climatic, and ecological controls on extreme wildfire years in the northwestern United States. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:154-174.
38. Greene D.F., Johnson E.A. Tree recruitment from burn edges. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30:1264-1274.
39. Halofsky, J.E., Donato, D.C., Hibbs, D.E., Campbell, J.L., Cannon, M.D., Fontaine, J.B., Thompson, J.R., Anthony, R.G., Bormann, B.T., Kayes, L.J., Law, B.E., Peterson, D.L., Spies, T.A., 2011. Mixed-severity Fire Regimes: Lessons and Hypotheses from the Klamath-Siskiyou Ecoregion. Ecosphere 2, art40.
40. Hardy C.C., Schmidt K.M., Menakis J.P., Sampson R.N. Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2001, 10:353-372.
41. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K. An environmental narrative of inland northwest United States forests, 1800-2000. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 178:23-59.
42. Hessburg P.F., Agee J.K., Franklin J.F. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:117-139.
43. Hessburg P.F., Salter R.B., James K.M. Re-examining fire severity relations in pre-management era mixed conifer forests: inferences from landscape patterns of forest structure. Landscape Ecol. 2007, 22:5-24.
44. Heyerdahl E.K., Brubaker L.B., Agee J.K. Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example from the interior west, USA. Ecology 2001, 82:660-678.
45. Heyerdahl E., Lertzman K., Wong C.M. Mixed-severity fire regimes in dry forests of southern interior British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 2012, 42:88-98.
46. Holmes R.L. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bull. 1983, 43:69-78.
47. Hutto R.L. Toward meaningful snag-management guidelines for postfire salvage logging in North American conifer forests. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:984-993.
48. Johnson E., Fryer G. Population dynamics in lodgepole pine-Engelmann spruce forests. Ecology 1989, 70:1335-1345.
49. Johnson E., Gutsell S. Fire frequency models, methods and interpretations. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1994, 25:239-287.
50. Jonsson B., Holm S., Kallur H. A forest inventory method based on density-adapted circular plot size. Scand. J. For. Res. 1992, 7:405-421.
51. Kipfmueller K.F., Baker W.L. A comparison of three techniques to date stand-replacing fires in lodgepole pine forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 1998, 104:171-177.
52. Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., Neter J., Li W. Applied Linear Statistical Models 2005, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA. fifth ed.
53. Landres P., Morgan P., Swanson F. Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:1179-1188.
54. Lau, M.K., 2013. DTK: Dunnett-Tukey-Kramer Pairwise Multiple Comparison Test Adjusted for Unequal Variances and Unequal Sample Sizes. R Package Version 3.5. (accessed 21.07.13). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DTK/index.html.
55. Lehmkuhl J.F., Everett R.L., Schellhaas R., Ohlson P., Keenum D., Riesterer H., Spurbeck D. Cavities in snags along a wildfire chronosequence in eastern Washington. J. Wildlife Manage. 2003, 67:219-228.
56. Lentile L.B., Smith F.W., Shepperd W.D. Patch structure, fire-scar formation, and tree regeneration in a large mixed-severity fire in the South Dakota Black Hills, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 2005, 35:2875-2885.
57. Lentile L.B., Smith F.W., Shepperd W.D. Influence of topography and forest structure on patterns of mixed severity fire in ponderosa pine forests of the South Dakota Black Hills, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2006, 15:557-566.
58. Lertzman K., Fall J., Dorner B. Three kinds of heterogeneity in fire regimes: at the crossroads of fire history and landscape ecology. Northwest Sci. 1998, 72:4-23.
59. Lessard V.C., Drummer T.D., Reed D.D. Precision of density estimates from fixed-radius plots compared to N-tree distance sampling. For. Sci. 2002, 48:1-6.
60. Little R.L., Peterson D.L., Conquest L.L. Regeneration of subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) following fire: effects of climate and other factors. Can. J. For. Res. 1994, 24:934-944.
61. Mah, S., 2000. Relationship between Vital Attributes of Ktunaxa Plants and Natural Disturbance Regimes in Southeastern British Columbia. M.Sc. Thesis. The University of British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry. Vancouver, B.C.
62. Marcoux H.M., Gergel S.G., Daniels L.D. Mixed-severity fire regimes: how well are they represented by existing fire-regime classification systems?. Can. J. For. Res. 2013, 43:658-668.
63. Margolis E.Q., Balmat J. Fire history and fire-climate relationships along a fire regime gradient in the Santa Fe Municipal Watershed, NM, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 358:2416-2430.
64. McKenzie D., Kennedy M.C. Scaling laws and complexity in fire regimes. The Landscape Ecology of Fire 2011, 27-49. Springer, Netherlands.
65. Meidinger, D., Pojar, J., 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia. Spec. Rep. Ser. No. 6. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. (accessed 02.04.11). http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Srs/Srs06.htm.
66. Merschel A.G., Spies T.A., Heyerdahl E.K. Mixed-conifer forests of central Oregon: effects of logging and fire exclusion vary with environment. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24:1670-1688.
67. Miller J.D., Skinner C.N., Safford H.D., Knapp E.E., Ramirez C.M. Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:184-203.
68. Moritz M.A., Hessburg P.F., Povak N.A. Native fire regimes and landscape resilience. The Landscape Ecology of Fire 2011, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 51-86.
69. Morrison M.L., Raphael M.G. Modeling the dynamics of snags. Ecol. Appl. 1993, 3:322-330.
70. Odion D.C., Hanson C.T., Arsenault A., Baker W.L., DellaSala D.A., Hutto R.L., Klenner W., Moritz M.A., Sherriff R.L., Veblen T.T. Examining historical and current mixed-severity fire regimes in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of western North America. PloS One 2014, 9:e87852.
71. Oksanen, J.F., Blanchet, G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Wagner, H., 2011. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.17-6. (accessed 05.03.13). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
72. Oliver C.D., Larson B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics 1996, McGraw-Hill Inc.
73. Peres-Neto P.R., Jackson D.A., Somers K.M. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 2003, 84:2347-2363.
74. Perry D.A., Hessburg P.F., Skinner C.N., Spies T.A., Stephens S.L., Taylor A.H., Franklin J.F., McComb B., Riegel G. The ecology of mixed severity fire regimes in Washington, Oregon, and Northern California. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 262:703-717.
75. Pyne S.J. Year of the Fires: The Story of the Great Fires of 1910 2008, Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula, MT.
76. Richman M.B. A cautionary note concerning a commonly applied eigenanalysis procedure. Tellus 1988, 40B:50-58.
77. Romme W.H. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monogr. 1982, 52:199-221.
78. Schmidt, W.C., Shearer, R.C., Roe, A.L., 1976. Ecology and Silviculture of Western Larch Forests. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1520.
79. Schoennagel T., Veblen T., Romme W. The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. BioScience 2004, 54:661-676.
80. Sherriff R.L., Veblen T.T. Ecological effects of changes in fire regimes in Pinus ponderosa ecosystems in the Colorado Front Range. J. Veg. Sci. 2006, 17:705.
81. Sherriff R.L., Platt R.V., Veblen T.T., Schoennagel T.L., Gartner M.H. Historical, observed, and modeled wildfire severity in montane forests of the Colorado Front Range. PloS One 2014, 9:e106971.
82. Soverel N.O., Coops N.C., Perrakis D.D., Daniels L.D., Gergel S.E. The transferability of a dNBR-derived model to predict burn severity across 10 wildland fires in western Canada. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20:518-531.
83. Spies T.A., Hemstrom M.A., Youngblood A., Hummel S. Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:351-362.
84. Stephens S.L., Agee J.K., Fulé P.Z., North M.P., Romme W.H., Swetnam T.W., Turner M.G. Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 2013, 342:41-42. 10.1126/science.1240294.
85. Stine, P., Hessburg P.F., Spies, T.A., Kramer, M., Fettig C.J., Hansen, A., Lehmkuhl, J., O'Hara, K., Polivka, K., Singleton, P., Charnley, S., Merschel, A., 2014. The Ecology and Management of Moist Mixed-conifer Forests in Eastern Oregon and Washington: A Synthesis of the Relevant Biophysical Science and Implications for Future Land Management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-897. Portland, OR. 254p.
86. Swetnam T., Allen C., Betancourt J. Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:1189-1206.
87. Taylor A.H., Skinner C.N. Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath Mountains. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:704-719.
88. Turner M.G. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 2010, 91:2833-2849.
89. Turner M.G., Romme W.H., Gardner R.H., Hargrove W.W. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67:411-433.
90. Turner M.G., Romme W.H., Gardner R.H. Prefire heterogeneity, fire severity, and early postfire plant reestablishment in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Int. J. Wildland Fire 1999, 9:21-36.
91. Valentine, K., Sprout, P., Baker, T., Lavkulich, L., 1978. The Soil Landscapes of British 944 Columbia. Resource Analysis Branch, B.C. Ministry of the Environment.
92. Van Wagner C., Finney M., Heathcott M. Historical fire cycles in the Canadian Rocky Mountain parks. For. Sci. 2006, 52:704-717.
93. Veblen T.T. Regeneration dynamics. Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction 1992, 152-187. Chapman Hall, New York, NY. D.G. Glenn-Lewin, R.K. Peet, T.T. Veblen (Eds.).