Generalized Lorentzian Tensor Approach (GLTA) as a biophysical background for quantitative susceptibility mapping

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 757-764

  Yablonskiy, Dmitriy A ^a   Sukstanskii, Alexander L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Generalized Lorentzian Tensor Approach; Magnetic susceptibility; Phase contrast; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; White matter

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAPPING; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; TENSORS; TISSUE;

ANISOTROPY OF MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENERALIZED LORENTZIAN TENSOR APPROACH; GRADIENT RECALLED ECHOS; INHOMOGENEOUS MAGNETIC FIELD; PHASE CONTRASTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; TISSUE MICROSTRUCTURES; WHITE MATTER;

MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; GENERALIZED LORENTZIAN TENSOR APPROACH; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MICROSCOPY; MYELIN SHEATH; NERVE FIBER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; TISSUE STRUCTURE; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84921366188     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25538     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. de Rochefort L, Brown R, Prince MR, Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1003-1009.
2. Shmueli K, De Zwart JA, Van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1510-1522.
3. de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:194-206.
4. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys 2010;37:5165-5178.
5. Schweser F, Sommer K, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage 2011;62:2083-2100.
6. Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Wong R, Prince M, Wang Y. Unambiguous identification of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles through quantitative susceptibility mapping of the nonlinear response to magnetic fields. Magn Reson Imaging 2010;28:1383-1389.
7. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:1471-1477.
8. He X, Yablonskiy DA. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:13558-13563.
9. Yablonskiy DA, Luo J, Sukstanskii AL, Iyer A, Cross AH. Biophysical mechanisms of MRI signal frequency contrast in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:14212-14217.
10. Yablonskiy DA, He X, Luo J, Sukstanskii AL. Lorentz sphere versus generalized Lorentzian approach: what would Lorentz say about it? Magn Reson Med 2014;72:4-7.
11. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:18559-18564.
12. Sati P, van Gelderen P, Silva AC, Reich DS, Merkle H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Micro-compartment specific T2∗ relaxation in the brain. Neuroimage 2013;77:268-278.
13. Sukstanskii AL, Yablonskiy DA. On the role of neuronal magnetic susceptibility and structure symmetry on gradient echo MR signal formation. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:345-353.
14. Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL. Biophysical mechanisms of myelin-induced water frequency shifts. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1956-1958.
15. Duyn JH, Barbara TM. Sphere of Lorentz and demagnetization factors in white matter. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:1-3.
16. Duyn JH. Frequency shifts in the myelin water compartment. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1953-1955.
17. Sukstanskii AL, Yablonskiy DA. Gaussian approximation in the theory of MR signal formation in the presence of structure-specific magnetic field inhomogeneities. J Magn Reson 2003;163:236-247.
18. Marques JP, Bowtell R. Application of a fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2005;25B:65-78.
19. Salomir R, de Senneville BD, Moonen CT. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson 2003;19B:26-34.
20. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:5130-5135.
21. Durrant CJ, Hertzberg MP, Kuchel PW. Magnetic susceptibility: further insights into macroscopic and microscopic fields and the sphere of Lorentz. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 2003;18A:72-95.
22. Lorentz HA. The theory of electrons. New York: B.G. Teubners; 1909. p 133.
23. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:749-763.
24. Stoner EC. Demagnetising factor for ellipsoids. PhilMag 1945;36:803-821.
25. Osborn JA. Demagnetising factor for the general ellipsoid. PhysRev 1945;67:351-356.
26. He X, Yablonskiy DA. Quantitative BOLD: mapping of human cerebral deoxygenated blood volume and oxygen extraction fraction: default state. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:115-126.
27. Denk C, Torres EH, Mackay A, Rauscher A. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR signal phase and decay. NMR Biomed 2011;24:246-252.
28. Liu CL, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2012;59:1290-1298.
29. Rudko DA, Klassen LM, de Chickera SN, Gati JS, Dekaban GA, Menon RS. Origins of R-2(∗) orientation dependence in gray and white matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:E159-E167.
30. Luo J, He X, Yablonskiy DA. Magnetic susceptibility induced white matter MR signal frequency shifts-experimental comparison between Lorentzian sphere and generalized Lorentzian approaches. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:1251-1263.
31. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps. Magn Reson Med 2014. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25189.
32. Li X, van Zijl PC. Mean magnetic susceptibility regularized susceptibility tensor imaging (MMSR-STI) for estimating orientations of white matter fibers in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:610-619.
33. Chadzynski GL, Bender B, Groeger A, Erb M, Klose U. Tissue specific resonance frequencies of water and metabolites within the human brain. J Magn Reson 2011;212:55-63.