Unambiguous identification of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles through quantitative susceptibility mapping of the nonlinear response to magnetic fields

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1383-1389

  Liu, Tian ^a   Spincemaille, Pascal ^a   de Rochefort, Ludovic ^a   Wong, Richard ^a   Prince, Martin ^a   Wang, Yi ^a,b  

^a School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Air; COSMOS; MRI; Nonlinear magnetization response; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; SPIO

Indexed keywords

SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE; WATER;

AIR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING;

AIR; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; MAGNETICS; MICE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; WATER;

MUS;

EID: 77958179017     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bulte J.W., Kraitchman D.L. Iron oxide MR, contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed 2004, 17(7):484-499.
2. Jung C.W., Jacobs P. Physical and chemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agents: ferumoxides, ferumoxtran, ferumoxsil. Magn Reson Imaging 1995, 13(5):661-674.
3. Wang Y.X., Hussain S.M., Krestin G.P. Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and applications in MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2001, 11(11):2319-2331.
4. Cunningham C.H., Arai T., Yang P.C., McConnell M.V., Pauly J.M., Conolly S.M. Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 2005, 53(5):999-1005.
5. Edelman R.R., Storey P., Dunkle E., Li W., Carrillo A., Vu A., et al. Gadolinium-enhanced off-resonance contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57(3):475-484.
6. Faber C., Heil C., Zahneisen B., Balla D.Z., Bowtell R. Sensitivity to local dipole fields in the CRAZED experiment: an approach to bright spot MRI. J Magn Reson 2006, 182(2):315-324.
7. Koktzoglou I., Li D., Dharmakumar R. Dephased FLAPS for improved visualization of susceptibility-shifted passive devices for real-time interventional MRI. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52(13):N277-N286.
8. Mani V., Briley-Saebo K.C., Itskovich V.V., Samber D.D., Fayad Z.A. Gradient echo acquisition for superparamagnetic particles with positive contrast (GRASP): sequence characterization in membrane and glass superparamagnetic iron oxide phantoms at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 2006, 55(1):126-135.
9. Stuber M., Gilson W.D., Schar M., Kedziorek D.A., Hofmann L.V., Shah S., et al. Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON). Magn Reson Med 2007, 58(5):1072-1077.
10. Dixon W.T., Blezek D.J., Lowery L.A., Meyer D.E., Kulkarni A.M., Bales B.C., et al. Estimating amounts of iron oxide from gradient echo images. Magn Reson Med 2009.
11. Liu T., Spincemaille P., de Rochefort L., Kressler B., Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009, 61(1):196-204.
12. de Rochefort L., Brown R., Prince M.R., Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 2008, 60(4):1003-1009.
13. Shapiro E.M., Skrtic S., Sharer K., Hill J.M., Dunbar C.E., Koretsky A.P. MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101(30):10901-10906.
14. Heyn C., Ronald J.A., Mackenzie L.T., MacDonald I.C., Chambers A.F., Rutt B.K., et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of single cells in mouse brain with optical validation. Magn Reson Med 2006, 55(1):23-29.
15. Marques J.P., Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B-Magn Reson Eng 2005, 25B(1):65-78.
16. de Rochefort L., Liu T., Kressler B., Liu J., Spincemaille P., Lebon V., et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(1):194-206.
17. Koch K.M., Papademetris X., Rothman D.L., de Graaf R.A. Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(24):6381-6402.
18. Salomir R., De Senneville B.D., Moonen C.T.W. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson Part B-Magn Reson Eng 2003, 19B(1):26-34.
19. Glover G.H., Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991, 18(2):371-383.
20. Akter M., Hirai T., Hiai Y., Kitajima M., Komi M., Murakami R., et al. Detection of hemorrhagic hypointense foci in the brain on susceptibility-weighted imaging clinical and phantom studies. Acad Radiol 2007, 14(9):1011-1019.
21. Haacke E.M., Brown R.W., Thompson M.R., Venkatesan R. Objects in external fields: the Lorentz sphere. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design 1999, 749-757. Wiley-Liss, New York.
22. Wharton S., Schafer A., Bowtell R. Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63(5):1292-1304.
23. Liu T., Khalidov I., Rochefort L.D., Spincemaille P., Liu J., Wang Y. Improved background field correction using effective dipole fitting 2010, 141. Proc 18th Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
24. Schweser F., Lehr B.W., Deistung A., Reichenbach J.R. A novel approach for separation of background phase in SWI phase data utilizing the harmonic function mean value property 2010, 142. Proc 18th Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
25. Schweser F., Hütten M., Lehr B.W., Deistung A., Güllmar D., Reichenbach J.R. Resolving phase: inversion of SWI-phase data in order to obtain its sources utilizing the concept of a generalized lorentzian approximation 2010, 5003. Proc 18th Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
26. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging 2010, 700. Proc 18th Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
27. Liu J., Liu T., Rochefort L.D., Khalidov I., Prince M.R., Wang Y. Quantitative susceptibility mapping by regulating the field to source inverse problem with a sparse prior derived from the Maxwell equation: validation and application to brain 2010, 4996. Proc 18th Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Stockholm, Sweden.
28. Kressler B., de Rochefort L., Liu T., Spincemaille P., Jiang Q., Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009.
29. Shmueli K., de Zwart J.A., van Gelderen P., Li T.Q., Dodd S.J., Duyn J.H. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62(6):1510-1522.
30. Gleich B., Weizenecker J. Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles. Nature 2005, 435:1214-1217.