Lorentz sphere versus generalized Lorentzian approach: What would lorentz say about it?

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 4-7

  Yablonskiy, Dmitriy A ^a   He, Xiang ^b   Luo, Jie ^c   Sukstanskii, Alexander L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LORENTZ;

CONCEPT ANALYSIS; GENERALIZED LORENTZIAN APPROACH; LETTER; LORENTZ SPHERE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; OPTIC NERVE; PROCEDURES; WHITE MATTER;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC NERVE; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84902548877     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25230     Document Type: Letter

References (14)

1. Duyn JH, Barbara T,. The sphere of Lorentz and demagnetization factors in white matter. Magn Reson Med 2013; 72: 1-3.
2. He X, Yablonskiy DA,. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 13558-13563.
3. Lorentz HA,. The theory of electrons. Leipzig, Germany: B.G. Teubners; 1909. p. 133.
4. Denk C, Hernandez Torres E, MacKay A, Rauscher A,. The influence of white matter fibre orientation on MR signal phase and decay. NMR Biomed 2011; 24: 246-252.
5. Yablonskiy DA, Luo J, Sukstanskii AL, Iyer A, Cross AH,. Biophysical mechanisms of MRI signal frequency contrast in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 14212-14217.
6. Luo J, He X, Yablonskiy DA,. Magnetic susceptibility induced white matter MR signal frequency shifts-experimental comparison between Lorentzian sphere and generalized Lorentzian approaches. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 1251-1263.
7. Sukstanskii AL, Yablonskiy DA,. On the role of neuronal magnetic susceptibility and structure symmetry on gradient echo MR signal formation. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71: 345-353.
8. Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA, Springer CS Jr,. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990; 13: 239-262.
9. Liu CL,. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1471-1477.
10. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Silva AC, Duyn JH,. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107: 5130-5135.
11. Wharton S, Bowtell R,. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 18559-18564.
12. Sati P, van Gelderen P, Silva AC, Reich DS, Merkle H, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH,. Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain. Neuroimage 2013; 77: 268-278.
13. Jackson JD,. Classical electrodynamics, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999. 832 p.
14. Durrant CJ, Hertzberg MP, Kuchel PW,. Magnetic susceptibility: further insights into macroscopic and microscopic fields and the sphere of Lorentz. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A 2003; 18A: 72-95.