Method for investigating intradriver heterogeneity using vehicle trajectory data: A Dynamic Time Warping approach

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 73, Issue , 2015, Pages 59-80

  Taylor, Jeffrey ^a   Zhou, Xuesong ^b   Rouphail, Nagui M ^c   Porter, Richard J ^a  

^a University of Utah   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

^c North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Car following model; Driver behavior heterogeneity; Dynamic Time Warping; Vehicle trajectory data

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; METAL DRAWING; VEHICLES;

CAR FOLLOWING MODELS; CAR-FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; DYNAMIC TIME WARPING; DYNAMIC TIME WARPING ALGORITHMS; MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION MODELS; TIME DEPENDENT PARAMETER; VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES;

TRAJECTORIES;

ALGORITHM; CAR USE; HETEROGENEITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TRAJECTORY; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84921308387     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ahn S., Cassidy M.J., Laval J. Verification of a simplified car-following theory. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38:431-440.
2. Ahn S., Vadlamani S., Laval J. A method to account for non-steady state conditions in measuring traffic hysteresis. Transportation Research Part C 2013, 34:138-147.
3. Brockfeld E., Kühne R., Wagner P. Calibration and validation of microscopic traffic flow models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004, 1876:62-70.
4. Chen D., Laval J., Zheng Z., Ahn S. A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(6):744-761.
5. Chen X., Li L., Zhang Y. A Markov model for headway/spacing distribution of road traffic. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2010, 11(4):773-785.
6. Chiabaut N., Leclercq L., Buisson C. From heterogeneous drivers to macroscopic patterns in congestion. Transportation Research Part B 2010, 44(2):299-308.
7. Chu, S., Keogh, E., Hart, D., Pazzani, M., 2002. Iterative deepening dynamic time warping for time series. In: Proc. of the Second SIAM Intl. Conf. on Data Mining. Arlington, Virginia.
8. Ciuffo, B., Punzo, V., Quaglietta, E., 2011. Kriging meta-modelling to verify traffic micro-simulation calibration methods. In: 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
9. Den W., Lei H., Zhou X. Freeway traffic state estimation and uncertainty quantification based on heterogeneous data sources: stochastic three detector. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 57:132-157.
10. Duret A., Buisson C., Chiabaut N. Estimating individual speed-spacing relationship and assessing ability of Newell's car-following model to reproduce trajectories. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2088:188-197.
11. Hamdar, S.H., Treiber, M., Mahmassani, H.S., 2009. Genetic algorithm calibration for a stochastic car-following model using trajectory data: exploration and model properties. In: 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
12. Hoogendoorn, S.P., Hoogendoorn, R.G., Daamen, W., 2011. Wiedemann revisited: a new trajectory filtering technique and its implications for car-following modeling. In: 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.
13. Keogh, E., Pazzani, M., 2001. Derivative dynamic time warping. In: First SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM'2001), Chicago, Illinois.
14. Kesting A., Treiber M. Calibrating car-following models by using trajectory data: methodological study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2088:148-156.
15. Kesting A., Treiber M. Calibration of car-following models using floating car data. Traffic and Granular Flow '07 2009, 117-127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. C. Appert-Rolland, F. Chevoir, P. Gondret, S. Lassarre, J.-P. Lebacque, M. Schreckenberg (Eds.).
16. Kim I., Kim T., Sohn K. Identifying driver heterogeneity in car-following based on a random coefficient model. Transportation Research Part C 2013, 36:35-44.
17. Kim, J., Mahmassani, H.S., 2011. Correlated parameters in driving behavior models: car-following example and implications for traffic microsimulation. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 23-27, 2011.
18. Laval J.A., Leclercq L. A mechanism to describe the formation and propagation of stop-and-go waves in congested freeway traffic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2010, 368:4519-4541.
19. Li L., Wang F., Jiang R., Hu J.H., Ji Y. A new car-following model yielding log-normal type headways distributions. Chinese Physics B 2010, 19(2):020513.
20. Ma X., Andréasson I. Estimation of driver reaction time from car-following data: application in evaluation of general motor-type model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1965:130-141.
21. Newell G.F. Theories of instabilities in dense highway traffic. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 1962, 5:9-54.
22. Newell G.F. A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic. Part I: General theory. Transportation Research Part B 1993, 27:281-287.
23. Newell G.F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36:195-205.
24. Ossen, S., Hoogendoorn, S.P., 2005. Car-following behavior analysis from microscopic trajectory data. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1934, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 13-21.
25. Ossen, S., Hoogendoorn, S.P., 2007. Driver heterogeneity in car following and its impact on modeling traffic dynamics. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp. 95-103.
26. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P. Validity of trajectory-based calibration approach of car-following models in presence of measurement errors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2088:117-125.
27. Ossen, S., Hoogendoorn, S.P., 2008b. Calibrating Car-Following Models Using Microscopic Trajectory Data: A Critical Analysis of Both Microscopic Trajectory Data Collection Methods and Calibration Studies Based on These Data. Version 1.1 ed. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
28. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P. Reliability of parameter values estimated using trajectory observations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2009, 2124:36-44.
29. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P. Heterogeneity in car-following behavior: theory and empirics. Transportation Research Part C 2011, 19(2):182-195.
30. Ossen S., Hoogendoorn S.P., Gorte B. Interdriver differences in car-following: a vehicle trajectory-based study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1965:121-129.
31. Sakoe H., Chiba S. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans Acoustics Speech Signal Process ASSP 1978, 26:43-49.
32. Salvador S., Chan P. FastDTW: toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. KDD Workshop on Mining Temporal and Sequential Data 2004, 70-80. Seattle, WA, USA.
33. Senin P. Dynamic Time Warping Algorithm Review 2008, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
34. US Department of Transportation (USDOT), 2006. NGSIM - Next Generation Simulation, (accessed 20.06.2001). http://ngsim-community.org.
35. Wagner P. Analyzing fluctuations in car-following. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46:1384-1392.
36. Wang H., Wang W., Chen J., Jing M. Using trajectory data to analyze intradriver heterogeneity in car-following. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010, 2188:85-95.
37. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. Freeway traffic oscillations: microscopic analysis of formations and propagations using wavelet transform. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(9):1378-1388.
38. Zheng Z., Ahn S., Chen D., Laval J. The impact of lane-changing on the immediate follower: anticipation, relaxation, and behavioral change. Transportation Research Part C 2013, 26(1):367-379.
39. Zinke, A., Mayer, D., 2006. Iterative Multi Scale Dynamic Time Warping. Technical Report CG-2006-1, Universität Bonn.