Patterns of pollen quantity and quality limitation of pre-zygotic reproduction in Mimulus guttatus vary with co-flowering community context

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1261-1269

  Arceo Gómez, Gerardo ^a   Ashman, Tia Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLOWERING; POLLEN LIMITATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED PRODUCTION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA; MIMULUS GUTTATUS;

EID: 84921299719     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.01309     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aguilar R. et al. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. - Ecol. Lett. 9: 968-980.
2. Aizen M. A. and Harder L. D. 2007. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. - Ecology 88: 271-281.
3. Albrecht M. B. et al. 2012. Diverse pollinator communities enhance plant reproductive success. - Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 4845-4852.
4. Alonso C. et al. 2010. Is reproduction of endemic plant species particularly pollen limited in biodiversity hotspots?- Oikos 119: 1192-1200.
5. Alonso C. et al. 2012. A piece of the puzzle: a method for comparing pollination quality and quantity across multiple species and reproductive events. - New Phytol. 193: 532-542.
6. Alonso C. et al. 2013. Among species differences in pollen quality and quantity limitation: implications for endemics in biodiverse hotspots. - Ann. Bot. 112: 1461-1469.
7. Anderson S. H. et al. 2011. Cascading effects of bird functional extinction reduce pollination and plant density. - Science 331: 1068-1071.
8. Arceo-Gómez G. and Ashman T.-L. 2011. Heterospecific pollen deposition: does diversity alter the consequences?- New Phytol. 192: 738-746.
9. Arceo-Gómez G. and Ashman T.-L. 2014. Co-flowering community context influences female fitness and alters the adaptive value of flower longevity in Mimulus guttatus. - Am. Nat. 180:E000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.653k7.
10. Ashman T.-L. and Morgan T. M. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?- Proc. R. Soc. B. 271: 553-559.
11. Ashman T.-L. et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. - Ecology 85: 2408-2421.
12. Bell J. M. et al. 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. - Ecology 86: 762-771.
13. Burd M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. - Bot. Rev. 60: 83-139.
14. Carr D. E. and Dudash M. R. 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. - Heredity 75: 437-445.
15. Carr D. E. and Dudash M. R. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. - Evolution 51: 1797-1807.
16. Caruso C. M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. - Evolution 54: 1546-1557.
17. Davis H. G. et al. 2004. Pollen limitation causes an allee effect in a wind-pollinated invasive grass (Spartina alterniflora). - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 13804-13807.
18. Demchik S. M. and Day T. A. 1996. Effect of enhanced UV-B radiation of pollen quantity, quality, and seed yield in Brassica rapa (Brassicaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 83: 573-579.
19. Dole J. A. 1990. The role of corolla abscission in delayed self-pollination of Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 77: 1505-1507.
20. Dudash M. R. and Ritland K. 1991. Multiple paternity and self-fertilization in relation to floral age in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 78: 1746-1753.
21. Ehrlén J. and Eriksson O. 1995. Pollen limitation and population growth in a herbaceous perennial legume. - Ecology 76: 652-656.
22. Fishman L. and Willis J. H. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. - New Phytol. 177: 802-810.
23. Freestone A. L. and Harrison S. 2006. Regional enrichment of local assemblages is robust to variation in local productivity, abiotic gradients and heterogeneity. - Ecol. Lett. 9: 95-102.
24. Freestone A. L. and Inouye B. D. 2006. Dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity shape scale-dependent diversity patterns in plant communities. - Ecology 87: 2425-2432.
25. Galen C. and Stanton M. L. 2003. Sunny-side up: flower heliotropism as a source of parental environmental effects on pollen quality and performance in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 90: 724-729.
26. Gay G. et al. 1987. Quality of a stress-sensitive Cucurbita pepo L. pollen. - Planta 171: 82-87.
27. Ghazoul J. 2006. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. - J. Ecol. 94: 295-304.
28. Gómez J. M. et al. 2010. Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. - J. Ecol. 98: 1243-1252.
29. Hamrick J. and Godt M. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 351: 1291-1298.
30. Harrison S. et al. 2000. Regional turnover and fluctuation in populations of five plants confined to serpentine seeps. - Conserv. Biol. 14: 769-779.
31. Hastie T. and Tibshirani R. 1990. Generalized additive models. - Chapman and Hall.
32. Hegland S. J. et al. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions?- Ecol. Lett. 12: 184-195.
33. Herrera C. M. 1987. Components of pollinator quality: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. - Oikos 50: 79-90.
34. Hughes A. R. et al. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. - Ecol. Lett. 11: 609-623.
35. Kearns C. A. and Inouye D. W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biology. - Univ. of Texas Press.
36. Knight T. M. 2003. Floral density, pollen limitation, and reproductive success in Trillium grandiflorum. - Oecologia 137: 557-563.
37. Knight T. M. et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 467-497.
38. Kunin W. E. 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. - J. Ecol. 85: 225-234.
39. Lankau R. A. and Strauss S. Y. 2007. Mutual feedbacks maintain both genetic and species diversity in a plant community. - Science 317: 1561-1563.
40. Larson B. M. and Barrett S. C. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 503-520.
41. Ledesma N. and Sugiyama N. 2005. Pollen quality and performance in strawberry plants exposed to high-temperature stress. - J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130: 341-347.
42. Lu Y. 2000. Effects of density on mixed mating systems and reproduction in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. - Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: 671-681.
43. Mitchell R. J. et al. 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. - Ann. Bot. 103: 1403-1413.
44. Motten A. F. and Stone J. L. 2000. Heritability of stigma position and the effect of stigma-anther separation on outcrossing in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 87: 339-347.
45. Price M. V. et al. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. - Ecology 86: 2106-2116.
46. Rosenthal R. and Rosnow R. L. 1985. Contrast analysis: focused comparison in the analysis of variance. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
47. Ryan S. E. and Porth L. S. 2007. A tutorial on the piecewise regression approach applied to bedload transport data. US Dept Agric., Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Res. Stn Fort Collins, CO.
48. Sargent R. D. et al. 2011. Effect of local community phylogenetic structure on pollen limitation in an obligately insect-pollinated plant. - Am. J. Bot. 98: 283-289.
49. Schuett E. M. and Vamosi J. C. 2010. Phylogenetic community context influences pollen delivery to Allium cernuum. - Evol. Biol. 37: 19-28.
50. Strauss S. Y. and Murch P. 2004. Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of tolerance: compensating for herbivore damage by enhancing a mutualism. - Ecol. Entomol. 29: 234-239.
51. Thompson J. D. 2001. How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system?- Oecologia 126: 386-394.
52. Toms J. D. and Lesperance M. L. 2003. Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. - Ecology 84: 2034-2041.
53. Totland Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. - Ecology 82: 2233-2244.
54. Vamosi J. C. et al. 2006. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 956-961.
55. Vamosi J. C. et al. 2013. Drivers of pollen limitation: macroecological interactions between breeding system, rarity and diversity. - Plant Ecol. Diver. 6: 1-10.
56. Vanhoenacker D. et al. 2006. Spatio-temporal variation in pollen limitation and reproductive success of two scape morphs in Primula farinosa. - New Phytol. 169: 615-621.
57. Vaughton G. and Ramsey M. 2010. Floral emasculation reveals pollen quality limitation of seed ouput in Bulbine bulbosa (Asphodelaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 97: 174-178.
58. Vellend M. and Geber M. A. 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 767-781.
59. Vickery R. K. 1978. Case studies in evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. - Evol. Biol. 11: 405-507.
60. Vila M. et al. 2009. Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. - Proc. R. Soc. B. 276: 3887-3893.
61. Wilcock C. and Neiland R. 2002. Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. - Trends Plant Sci. 7: 270-277.
62. Willis J. H. 1993. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. - Evolution 47: 864-876.