Induction, overhypotheses, and the shape bias: Some arguments and evidence for rational constructivism

The Origins of Object Knowledge

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Xu, Fei ^a   Dewar, Kathryn ^a   Perfors, Amy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; Early word learning; Empiricist; Inductive learning mechanisms; Infants; Innate concepts; Nativist; Object representations; Rational constructivist; Shape bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921258439     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216895.003.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Baillargeon, R. (2004). Infants' physical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 89-94.
2. Baldwin, D., Markman, E. M., & Melartin, R. L. (1993). Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: evidence from exploratory play. Child Development, 64, 711-728.
3. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200-204.
4. Booth, A. E., Waxman, S. R., & Huang, Y. T. (2005). Conceptual information permeates word learning in infancy. Developmental psychology, 41, 491-505.
5. Callanan, M. A. (1989). Development of object categories and inclusion relations: preschoolers' hypotheses about word meanings. Developmental Psychology, 25, 207-216.
6. Callanan, M. A., Repp, A. M., McCarthy, M. G., & Latzke, M .A. (1994). Children's hypotheses about word meanings: Is there a basic level constraint? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 108-138.
7. Cimpian, A., & Markman, E. M. (2005). The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning. Developmental Psychology, 41, 1003-1019.
8. Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. Psychological Review, 112, 347-382.
9. Dewar, K. & Xu, F. (in preparation) Overhypothesis formation in 9-month-old infants. Manuscript in preparation.
10. Dewar, K. & Xu, F. (in press) Do early nouns refer to kinds or distinct shapes? Evidence from 10-month-old infants. Psychological Science.
11. Dewar, K., & Xu, F. (2007) Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? Developmental Psychology, 43, 1227-1238.
12. Dewar, K. & Xu, F. (2008) Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct labels to refer to kinds: the effect of domain. Poster presented at the 16th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Vancouver, Canada.
13. Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2003) How specific is the shape bias? Child Development, 74, 168-178.
14. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The Essential Child. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Gelman, S. A., & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition, 66, B35-B47.
16. Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2007). Children's understanding of posterior probability. Cognition, 106, 325-344.
17. Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Gopnik, A., Glymore, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3-32.
19. Graham, S. A., Kilbreath, C. S., & Welder, A. N. (2004). 13-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development, 75, 409-427.
20. Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219-232.
21. Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2007). Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science, 10, 307-321.
22. Kushnir, T., Xu, F. & Wellman, H. (2008) Preschoolers use statistical sampling information to infer the preferences of others. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. MacRae (Eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
23. Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
24. Macnamara, J. (1982). Names for Things: A Study of Human Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Marcus, G. (2001). The Algebraic Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and Naming in Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Markson, L., Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2008). The shape of thought. Developmental Science, 11, 204-208.
28. Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 179-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38.
30. Perfors, A. (2008). Learnability, Representation, and Language: A Bayesian Approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31. Perfors, A., Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Xu, F. (2007) Learning inductive constraints. Talk presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, March 29-April 1, Boston, MA.
32. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
34. Samuelson, L. K. (2005). Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20 month olds. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1016-1037.
35. Samuelson, L. K., & Bloom, P. (2008). The shape controversy: What counts as an explanation of development? Introduction to the special section. Developmental Science, 11, 183-184.
36. Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B. (2005). They call it like they see it: spontaneous naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science, 8, 182-198.
37. Schlottman, A. (2001). Children's probability intuitions: understanding the expected value of complex gambles. Child Development, 72, 103-122.
38. Shipley, E. (1993). Categories, hierarchies, and induction. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 30, 265-301.
39. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13, 13-19.
40. Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179-211.
41. Spelke, E. S. (1994). Initial knowledge: six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431-445.
42. Teglas, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., & Bonatti, L. (2007) Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19156-19159.
43. Waxman, S. R. (1999). Specifying the scope of 13-month-olds' expectations for novel words. Cognition, 70, B35-B50.
44. Welder, A. N., & Graham, A. (2001). The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 72, 1653-1673.
45. Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007) Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 165-209.
46. Xu, F. (2007a). Rational statistical inference and cognitive development. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The Innate Mind: Foundations and the Future, vol. 3 (pp. 199-215). Oxford University Press.
47. Xu, F. (2007b). Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 400-406.
48. Xu, F., Carey, S., & Quint, N. (2004). The emergence of kind-based object individuation in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 155-190.
49. Xu, F., & Garcia, V. (2008). Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5012-5015.
50. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245-272.