Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 200-204

  Bloom, Paul ^a   Markson, Lori ^b  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347417073     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00038     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29.
2. Bloom, P. (in press). Theories of artifact categorization. Cognition.
3. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1997, April). The role of intentionality in children's naming of pictures. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
4. Cox, M. (1992). Children's drawings. London: Penguin Books.
5. Danto, A. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. DeLoache, J.S., & Burns, N.M. (1994). Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 83-110.
7. Dutton, D. (1979). Artistic crimes: The problem of forgery in the arts. British Journal of Aesthetics, 19, 304-314.
8. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children's drawings. London: Jill Norman.
9. Gelman, S.A., & Diesendruck, G. (in press). What's in a concept? Context, variability, and psychological essentialism. In I.E. Sigel (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives in the development of representational thought Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gelman, S.A., & Ebeling, K.S. (1997, April). The influence of shape and representational status on children's naming. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
11. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
12. Hall, D.G. (1995). Artifacts and origins. Unpublished manuscript. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
13. Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 624-628.
14. Ittelson, W.H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 171-187.
15. Jackendoff, R. (1992). Mme Tussaud meets the binding theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 1-31.
16. Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Landau, B., Smith, L.B., & Jones, S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
18. Levinson, J. (1993). Extending art historically. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51, 411-423.
19. Leyton, M. (1992). Symmetry, causality, mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Smith, L.B., Jones, S.S., & Landau, B. (1996). Naming in young children. A dumb attentional mechanism? Cognition, 60, 143-171.
21. Soja, N.N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.S. (1992). Perception, ontology, and word meaning. Cognition, 45, 101-107.
22. Zaitchik, D. (1990). When representations conflict with reality: The preschooler's problem with false beliefs and "false" photographs. Cognition, 35, 41-68.