Supporting Innovation by Promoting Analogical Reasoning

Tools for Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Markman, Arthur B ^a   Wood, Kristin L ^a   Linsey, Julie S ^b   Murphy, Jeremy T ^a   Laux, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogical reasoning; Analogical retrieval; Design; Idea generation; Knowledge representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920932886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381634.003.0005     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. ALTERMAN, R. (1988). Adaptive planning. Cognitive Science, 12, 393-421.
2. BARKER, K., CHAUDHRI, V. K., CHAW, S. Y., CLARK, P. E., FAN, J., ISRAEL, D., et al. (2004). A question-answering system for AP chemistry assessing KR&R technologies. Paper presented at the The Ninth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2004), Whistler, Canada.
3. BARKER, K., PORTER, B., and CLARK, P. E. (2001). A library of generic concepts for composing knowledge bases. Paper presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Victoria, B.C., Canada.
4. BASALLA, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5. CATRAMBONE, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 318-334.
6. CHRISTENSEN, B. T., and SCHUNN, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory and Cognition, 35(1), 29-38.
7. CLEMENT, C. A., and GENTNER, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
8. CLEMENT, C. A., MAWBY, R., and GILES, D. E. (1994). The effects of manifest relational similarity on analog retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 396-420.
9. DUNCKER, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58.
10. GENTNER, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
11. GENTNER, D., HOLYOAK, K. J., and KOKINOV, B. (Eds.) (2001). The analogical mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. GENTNER, D., RATTERMANN, M. J., and FORBUS, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 524-575.
13. GICK, M. L., and HOLYOAK, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
14. GICK, M. L., and HOLYOAK, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1-38.
15. GREINER, R. (1988). Learning by understanding analogies. Artificial Intelligence, 35(1), 81-125.
16. HIRTZ, J., STONE, R. B., MCADAMS, D. A., SZYKMAN, S., and WOOD, K. L. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 13, 65-82.
17. HOLYOAK, K. J., and THAGARD, P. (1995). Mental Leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. JANSSON, D. G., and SMITH, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3-11.
19. KOLODNER, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
20. LANDAUER, T. K., and DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
21. LINSEY, J. S., LAUX, J., CLAUSS, E. F., WOOD, K. L., and MARKMAN, A. B. (2007). Effects of analogous product representation on future design-by-analogy. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'07, Paris, France.
22. MARKMAN, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21(4), 373-418.
23. MARKMAN, A. B., TAYLOR, E., and GENTNER, D. (2007). Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1101-1106.
24. MCADAMS, D. A., and WOOD, K. L. (2000). Quantitative measures for design by analogy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, Md.
25. MILLER, G. A., and FELLBAUM, C. (1991). Semantic networks of English. Cognition, 41, 197-229.
26. MULLEN, B., JOHNSON, C., and SALAS, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3-23.
27. NEWELL, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
28. NEWELL, A., and SIMON, H. A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought. R. Oldenbourg KG.
29. OTTO, K., and WOOD, K. L. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
30. POLYA, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
31. ROSENBLIT, L., and KEIL, F. C. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
32. STONE, R. B., and WOOD, K. L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 359-370.
33. TULVING, E., and THOMSON, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.