Flexibility and symmetry of prokaryotic genome rearrangement reveal lineage-associated core-gene-defined genome organizational frameworks

mBio

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Kang, Yu ^a   Gu, Chaohao ^b   Yuan, Lina ^a   Wang, Yue ^c   Zhu, Yanmin ^a   Li, Xinna ^a   Luo, Qibin ^a   Xiao, Jingfa ^a   Jiang, Daquan ^c   Qian, Minping ^c   Ahmed Khan, Aftab ^a   Chen, Fei ^a   Zhang, Zhang ^a   Yu, Jun ^a  

^a Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA;

ACTINOBACTERIA; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BETAPROTEOBACTERIA; CELL ACTIVITY; CGOF GENE; CORE GENE DEFINED GENOME ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; CRENARCHAEOTA; CYANOBACTERIUM; EPSILONPROTEOBACTERIA; FIRMICUTES; GAMMAPROTEOBACTERIA; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC STABILITY; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPIROCHETE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ARCHAEAL GENOME; ARCHAEON; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; SYNTENY;

NEGIBACTERIA; POSIBACTERIA; PROKARYOTA;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENES, ESSENTIAL; GENOME, ARCHAEAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOMIC STRUCTURAL VARIATION; SYNTENY;

EID: 84920901633     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01867-14     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sobetzko P, Travers A, Muskhelishvili G. 2012. Gene order and chromosome dynamics coordinate spatiotemporal gene expression during the bacterial growth cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:E42–E50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108229109.
2. Montero Llopis P, Jackson AF, Sliusarenko O, Surovtsev I, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2010. Spatial organization of the flow of genetic information in bacteria. Nature 466:77–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09152.
3. Mira A, Martín-Cuadrado AB, D’Auria G, Rodríguez-Valera F. 2010. The bacterial pan-genome: a new paradigm in microbiology. Int. Microbiol. 13:45–57.
4. Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D, Ward NL, Angiuoli SV, Crabtree J, Jones AL, Durkin AS, Deboy RT, Davidsen TM, Mora M, Scarselli M, MargarityRos I, Peterson JD, Hauser CR, Sundaram JP, Nelson WC, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Selengut J, Gwinn ML, Zhou L, Zafar N, Khouri H, Radune D, Dimitrov G, Watkins K, O’Connor KJ, Smith S, Utterback TR, White O, Rubens CE, Grandi G, Madoff LC, Kasper DL, Telford JL, Wessels MR, Rappuoli R, Fraser CM. 2005. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial “pan-genome”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:13950-13955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506758102.
5. Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, von Mering C, Creevey CJ, Snel B, Bork P. 2006. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311:1283–1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1123061.
6. Nakamura Y, Itoh T, Matsuda H, Gojobori T. 2004. Biased biological functions of horizontally transferred genes in prokaryotic genomes. Nat. Genet. 36:760–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1381.
7. Kuhlman TE, Cox EC. 2012. Gene location and DNA density determine transcription factor distributions in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8:610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.42.
8. Sorek R, Zhu Y, Creevey CJ, Francino MP, Bork P, Rubin EM. 2007. Genome-wide experimental determination of barriers to horizontal gene transfer. Science 318:1449-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1147112.
9. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. 2005. Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer. Nat. Genet. 37:1372–1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1686.
10. Touchon M, Hoede C, Tenaillon O, Barbe V, Baeriswyl S, Bidet P, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S, Bouchier C, Bouvet O, Calteau A, Chiapello H, Clermont O, Cruveiller S, Danchin A, Diard M, Dossat C, Karoui ME, Frapy E, Garry L, Ghigo JM, Gilles AM, Johnson J, Le Bouguénec C, Lescat M, Mangenot S, Martinez-Jéhanne V, Matic I, Nassif X, Oztas S, Petit MA, Pichon C, Rouy Z, Ruf CS, Schneider D, Tourret J, Vacherie B, Vallenet D, Médigue C, Rocha EP, Denamur E. 2009. Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000344.
11. Kreimer A, Borenstein E, Gophna U, Ruppin E. 2008. The evolution of modularity in bacterial metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:6976–6981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712149105.
12. Campo N, Dias MJ, Daveran-Mingot ML, Ritzenthaler P, Le Bourgeois P. 2004. Chromosomal constraints in Gram-positive bacteria revealed by artificial inversions. Mol. Microbiol. 51:511–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03847.x.
13. Esnault E, Valens M, Espéli O, Boccard F. 2007. Chromosome structuring limits genome plasticity in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 3:e226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030226.
14. Darmon E, Leach DR. 2014. Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78:1–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00035-13.
15. Darling AE, Miklós I, Ragan MA. 2008. Dynamics of genome rearrangement in bacterial populations. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000128.
16. Cui L, Neoh HM, Iwamoto A, Hiramatsu K. 2012. Coordinated phenotype switching with large-scale chromosome flip-flop inversion observed in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:E1647–E1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204307109.
17. Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, White O, Salzberg SL. 2000. Evidence for symmetric chromosomal inversions around the replication origin in bacteria. Genome Biol. 1:Research0011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-research0011.
18. Sloan DB, Moran NA. 2013. The evolution of genomic instability in the obligate endosymbionts of whiteflies. Genome Biol. Evol. 5:783–793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evt044.
19. Andersen MT, Liefting LW, Havukkala I, Beever RE. 2013. Comparison of the complete genome sequence of two closely related isolates of “Candidatus Phytoplasma australiense” reveals genome plasticity. BMC Genomics 14:529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-529.
20. Shifman A, Ninyo N, Gophna U, Snir S. 2014. Phylo SI: a new genomewide approach for prokaryotic phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: 2391–2404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1138.
21. Brilli M, Liò P, Lacroix V, Sagot MF. 2013. Short and long-term genome stability analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Genomics 14:309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-309.
22. Rocha E. 2002. Is there a role for replication fork asymmetry in the distribution of genes in bacterial genomes? Trends Microbiol. 10:393–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02420-4.
23. Zhao XQ, Hu JF, Yu J. 2006. Comparative analysis of eubacterial DNA polymerase III alpha subunits. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 4:203–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60001-1.
24. Wu H, Zhang Z, Hu S, Yu J. 2012. On the molecular mechanism of GC content variation among eubacterial genomes. Biol. Direct 7:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-2.
25. Rocha EP. 2004. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150:1609-1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26974-0.
26. Rocha EP, Danchin A. 2003. Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6570-6577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg859.
27. Riley MA, Lizotte-Waniewski M. 2009. Population genomics and the bacterial species concept. Methods Mol. Biol. 532:367–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_21.
28. Feil EJ. 2004. Small change: keeping pace with microevolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:483–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro904.
29. Ferré-D’Amaré AR. 2011. Use of a coenzyme by the glmS ribozymeriboswitch suggests primordial expansion of RNA chemistry by small molecules. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366:2942–2948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0131.
30. Fox GE. 2010. Origin and evolution of the ribosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Bi o l2: a003483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003483.
31. Karberg KA, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ. 2011. Similarity of genes horizontally acquired by Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica is evidence of a supraspecies pangenome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:20154–20159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109451108.
32. Zhang Z, Li J, Cui P, Ding F, Li A, Townsend JP, Yu J. 2012. Codon deviation coefficient: a novel measure for estimating codon usage bias and its statistical significance. BMC Bioinformatics 13:43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-43.
33. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. 2005. Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer. Nat. Genet. 37:1372–1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1686.
34. Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10:563–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2474.
35. Zhao Y, Wu J, Yang J, Sun S, Xiao J, Yu J. 2012. PGAP: pan-genomes analysis pipeline. Bioinformatics 28:416–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts416.