Non-holistic coding of objects in lateral occipital complex with and without attention

NeuroImage

Volumn 107, Issue , 2015, Pages 356-363

  Guggenmos, Matthias ^a,b   Thoma, Volker ^c   Cichy, Radoslaw Martin ^d   Haynes, John Dylan ^a   Sterzer, Philipp ^a,b   Richardson Klavehn, Alan ^e,f  

^a BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^e OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; FMRI; Lateral occipital complex; Multivariate pattern analysis; Object recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920870223     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andresen D.R., Vinberg J., Grill-Spector K. The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 2009, 45:522-536.
2. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94:115-147.
3. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 1991, 20:585-593.
4. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint in variance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1993, 19:1162-1182.
5. Bisley J.W. The neural basis of visual attention. J. Physiol. 2011, 589:49-57.
6. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
7. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89:60-64.
8. Cichy R.M., Sterzer P., Heinzle J., Elliott L.T., Ramirez F., Haynes J.-D. Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:1636-1651.
9. Edelman S., Bülthoff H.H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res. 1992, 32:2385-2400.
10. Edelman S., Intrator N. (Coarse coding of shape fragments) Representation of structure. Spat. Vis. 2000, 13:255-264.
11. Eger E., Henson R.N.A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92:1241-1247.
12. Eger E., Ashburner J., Haynes J.-D., Dolan R.J., Rees G. fMRI activity patterns in human LOC carry information about object exemplars within category. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:356-370.
13. Eickhoff S.B., Stephan K.E., Mohlberg H., Grefkes C., Fink G.R., Amunts K., Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage 2005, 25:1325-1335.
14. Epshtein B., Ullman S. Semantic Hierarchies for Recognizing Objects and Parts. CVPR '07 2007, 1-8.
15. Ewbank M.P., Schluppeck D., Andrews T.J. fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 2005, 28:268-279.
16. Gauthier I., Hayward W.G., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron 2002, 34:161-171.
17. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1998, 6:316-328.
18. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
19. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., Malach R. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:837-843.
20. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 2001, 41:1409-1422.
21. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A., Grillspector K. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:14-23.
22. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
23. Haynes J.-D., Rees G. Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:686-691.
24. Hayward W.G., Zhou G., Man W.-F., Harris I.M. Repetition blindness for rotated objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:57-73.
25. Hayworth K.J., Biederman I. Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition. Vision Res. 2006, 46:4024-4031.
26. Hayworth K.J., Lescroart M.D., Biederman I. Neural encoding of relative position. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2011, 37:1032-1050.
27. Hebart M.N., Görgen K., Haynes J.-D. The Decoding Toolbox (TDT): A versatile software package for multivariate analyses of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 2014, 8.
28. Hummel J.E. Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: implications for shape perception and object recognition. Vis. Cogn. 2001, 8:489-517.
29. Hummel J.E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 1992, 99:480-517.
30. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron 2002, 35:793-801.
31. Kamitani Y., Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:679-685.
32. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:3310-3318.
33. Kourtzi Z., Erb M., Grodd W., Bülthoff H.H. Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:911-920.
34. Kriegeskorte N., Goebel R., Bandettini P. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:3863-3868.
35. Lerner Y., Hendler T., Ben-Bashat D., Harel M., Malach R. A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11:287-297.
36. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Bülthoff H.H., Poggio T. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4:401-414.
37. Malach R., Reppas J.B., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Jiang H., Kennedy W.A., Ledden P.J., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1995, 92:8135-8139.
38. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1978, 200:269-294.
39. Murray J.E. Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming. Mem. Cogn. 1999, 27:878-889.
40. Murray S.O., Wojciulik E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:70-74.
41. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
42. Olshausen B.A., Anderson C.H., Essen D.C.Van A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:4700-4719.
43. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:437-442.
44. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., Ashbridge E. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition 1998, 67:111-145.
45. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature 1990, 343:263-266.
46. Pratte M.S., Ling S., Swisher J.D., Tong F. How attention extracts objects from noise. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110:1346-1356.
47. Rice G.E., Watson D.M., Hartley T., Andrews T.J. Low-level image properties of visual objects predict patterns of neural response across category-selective regions of the ventral visual pathway. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34:8837-8844.
48. Serences J.T., Schwarzbach J., Courtney S.M., Golay X., Yantis S. Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:1346-1357.
49. Stankiewicz B.J., Hummel J.E., Cooper E.E. The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24:732-744.
50. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1995, 2:55-82.
51. Tarr M.J., Gauthier I. Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class?. Cognition 1998, 67:73-110.
52. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence of shape recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 1989, 21:233-282.
53. Thoma V., Davidoff J. Object recognition: attention and dual routes. Object Recognition, Attention, and Action 2007, 141-158. Springer, Tokyo. N. Osaka, I. Rentschler, I. Biederman (Eds.).
54. Thoma V., Henson R.N. Object representations in ventral and dorsal visual streams: fMRI repetition effects depend on attention and part-whole configuration. NeuroImage 2011, 57:513-525.
55. Thoma V., Hummel J.E., Davidoff J. Evidence for holistic representations of ignored images and analytic representations of attended images. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2004, 30:257-267.
56. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., Mazoyer B., Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 2002, 15:273-289.
57. Ullman S. Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 1989, 32:193-254.
58. Ullman S. Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition 1998, 67:21-44.
59. Ullman S. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:58-64.
60. Vuilleumier P., Henson R.N., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:491-499.