Object recognition: Attention and dual routes

Object Recognition, Attention, and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 141-157

  Thoma, Volker ^a   Davidoff, Jules ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958755416     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-73019-4_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Bartram DJ (1976) Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Mem Cognit 4:593-602.
2. Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115-147.
3. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1991) Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20:585-593.
4. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1992) Size invariance in visual object priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:121-133.
5. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects - evidence and conditions for 3-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1162-1182.
6. Corballis MC (1988) Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychol Rev 95:115-123.
7. Davidoff J, Warrington EK (1999) The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment. Neuropsychologia 37:279-292.
8. Davidoff J, Warrington EK (2001) A particular diffi culty in discriminating between mirror images. Neuropsychologia 39:1022-1036.
9. Edelman S, Intrator N (2003) Towards structural systematicity in distributed statically bound visual representations. Cogn Sci 27:73-110.
10. Ellis R, Allport DA, Humphreys GW, Collis J (1989) Varieties of object constancy. Q J Exp Psychol A 41A:775-796.
11. Farah MJ (1990) Visual agnosia: disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge MA.
12. Farah MJ (1991) Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: implications for visual object representation. Cognit Neuropsychol 8:1-19.
13. Forti S, Humphreys GW (in press) Representation of unseen objects in visual neglect: effects of view and object identity. Cognit Neuropsychol (in press).
14. Foster DH, Gilson SJ (2002) Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269:1939-1947.
15. Hayward WG (1998) Effects of outline shape in object recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:427-440.
16. Hayward WG, Williams P (2000) Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychol Sci 11:7-12.
17. Hummel JE (2001) Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: implications for shape perception and object recognition. Vis Cogn 8:489-517.
18. Hummel JE (2003) The complementary properties of holistic and analytic representations of object shape. In: Rhodes G, Peterson M (Eds) Analytic and holistic processes in the perception of faces objects and scenes. Greenwood, Westport CT, pp 212-234.
19. Hummel JE, Biederman I (1992) Dynamic binding in a neural network for shaperecognition. Psychol Rev 99:480-517.
20. Hummel JE, Stankiewicz BJ (1996) An architecture for rapid hierarchical structural description. In: Inui T, McClelland J (Eds) Attention and performance XVI: information integration in perception and communication. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 93-121.
21. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (1984) Routes to object constancy - implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Q J Exp Psychol A 36:385-415.
22. Humphreys GW, Rumiati RI (1998) Agnosia without prosopagnosia or alexia: evidence for stored visual memories specific to objects. Cognit Neuropsychol 15:243-277.
23. Humphreys GW, Cinel C, Wolfe JM, Olson A, Klempen N (2000) Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Res 40:1569-1596.
24. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (2000) Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 288:2054-2056.
25. Jolicoeur P (1985) The time to name disoriented natural objects. Mem Cognit 13:289-303.
26. Jolicoeur P (1990) Identification of disoriented objects: a dual systems theory. Mind Lang 5:387-410.
27. Lawson R (1999) Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychol 102:221-245.
28. Lawson R, Humphreys GW (1996) View specifi city in object processing: evidence from picture matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:395-416.
29. Lawson R, Humphreys GW (1998) View-specifi c effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Percept Psychophys 60:1052-1066.
30. Marshall JC, Halligan PW (1988) Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect. Nature 336:766-767.
31. Marsolek CJ (1999) Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol Sci 10:111-118.
32. McGlinchey-Berroth R, Milberg W, Verfaellie M, Alexander M, Kilduff PT (1993) Semantic processing in the neglected visual field: evidence from a lexical decision task. Cognit Neuropsychol 10:79-108.
33. Murray JE (1995) The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identifi cation of disoriented objects. Mem Cognit 23:49-58.
34. Murray JE (1998) Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent? Psychon B Rev 5:300-304.
35. Olshausen B, Anderson C, Van Essen D (1993) A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J Neurosci 13:4700-4719.
36. Poggio T, Edelman S (1990) A network that learns to recognize 3-dimensional objects. Nature 343:263-266.
37. Posner MI (1969) Abstraction and the process of recognition. In: Spence JT, Bower G (Eds) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, New York, pp 43-100.
38. Posner MI, Keele SW (1967) Decay of visual information from a single letter. Science 158:137-139.
39. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit Psychol 8:382-439.
40. Srinivas K (1995) Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. J Exp Psychol-Hum L 21:1019-1036.
41. Stankiewicz BJ, Hummel JE (2002) Automatic priming for translation- And scale-invariant representations of object shape. Vis Cogn 9:719-739.
42. Stankiewicz BJ, Hummel JE, Cooper EE (1998) The role of attention in priming for leftright refl ections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:732-744.
43. Tarr MJ, Bulthoff HH (1995) Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views - comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1494-1505.
44. Thoma V, Davidoff J (2006) Priming for depth-rotated objects depends on attention and part changes. Exp Psychol 53:31-47.
45. Thoma V, Hummel JE, Davidoff J (2004) Evidence for holistic representation of ignored images and analytic representation of attended images. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:257-267.
46. Thoma V, Davidoff J, Hummel JE (2007) Priming of plane-rotated objects depends on attention and view familiarity. Vis Cogn 15:179-210.
47. Vannucci M, Viggiano MP (2000) Category effects on the processing of plane-rotated objects. Perception 29:287-302.
48. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2002) Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 5:491-499.
49. Warrington EK, James M (1988) Visual apperceptive agnosia - A clinico-anatomical study of 3 cases. Cortex 24:13-32.
50. Warrington EK, Taylor AM (1978) Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception 7:584-694.
51. Zago L, Fenske MJ, Aminoff E, Bar M (2005) The rise and fall of priming: how visual exposure shapes cortical representations of objects. Cereb Cortex 15:1655-1665.