The relative importance of the adsorption and partitioning mechanisms in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1376, Issue , 2015, Pages 112-125

  Gritti, Fabrice ^a   Höltzel, Alexandra ^b   Tallarek, Ulrich ^b   Guiochon, Georges ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adsorption partitioning mechanism; HILIC; Intra particle diffusivity; Landauer's model; Retention mechanism; Torquato's model

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS; HEXANE; HYDROPHILICITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PACKED BEDS; POROUS MATERIALS; SOLVENTS;

HILIC; LANDAUER; PARTICLE DIFFUSIVITY; PARTITIONING MECHANISM; RETENTION MECHANISM;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

ACETONITRILE; ALCOHOL; CYTOSINE; HEXANE; NICOTINIC ACID; NORTRIPTYLINE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TETRAHYDROFURAN; TOLUENE; WATER; BUFFER; SOLVENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; ELUTION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; POROSITY; PROCEDURES;

ADSORPTION; BUFFERS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; CYTOSINE; DIFFUSION; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; NIACIN; NORTRIPTYLINE; POROSITY; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLVENTS; TOLUENE;

EID: 84920830867     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.11.087     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Horvath C., Melander W.R., Molnar I. Solvophobic interactions in liquid chromatography with nonpolar stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 125:129-156.
2. Vailaya A., Horvath C. Retention in reversed-phase chromatography: partition or adsorption?. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 829:1-27.
3. Dorsey J.G., Dill K.A. The molecular mechanism of retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89:331-346.
4. Martire D., Boehm R. Unified theory of retention and selectivity in liquid chromatography. 2. Reversed-phase liquid chromatography with chemically bonded phases. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87:1045-1062.
5. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Critical contribution of nonlinear chromatography to the understanding of retention mechanism in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1099:1-42.
6. Alpert A. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 499:177-196.
7. Hemstrom P., Irgum K. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Sep. Sci 2006, 29:1784-1821.
8. Ikegami T., Tomomatsu K., Takubo H., Horie K., Tanaka N. Separation efficiencies in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1184:474-503.
9. Jandera P. Stationary and mobile phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 692:1-25.
10. Jandera P. Stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction chromatography, their characterization and implementation into multidimensional chromatography concepts. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31:1421-1437.
11. Yoshida T. Peptide separation by hydrophilic-interaction chromatography: a review. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2004, 60:265-280.
12. Buszewski B., Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) a powerful separation technique. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402:231-247.
13. Gama M., da Costa Silva R., Collins C., Bottoli C. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 37:48-60.
14. Majors R. New chromatography columns and accessories at Pittcon 2012, Part i. LC-GC North Am. 2012, 30:290-311.
15. Kazakhevich Y.V., McNair H.M. Thermodynamic definition of HPLC dead volume. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1993, 31:317-322.
16. Kazakhevich Y.V., McNair H.M. Study of the excess adsorption of the eluent components on different reversed-phase adsorbents. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1995, 33:321-327.
17. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Thermodynamics of adsorption of binary aqueous organic liquid mixtures on a RPLC adsorbent. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1155:85-99.
18. Gritti F., Kazakhevich Y., Guiochon G. Effect of the surface coverage of endcapped c18-silica on the excess adsorption isotherms of commonly used organic solvents from water in reversed phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1169:111-124.
19. Gritti F., dos Santos Pereira A., Sandra P., Guiochon G. Comparison of the adsorption mechanisms of pyridine in hydrophilic interaction chromatography and in reversed-phase aqueous liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:8496-8504.
20. Melnikov S.M., Höltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. How ternary mobile phases allow tuning of analyte retention in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:8850-8856.
21. Melnikov S.M., Höltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. Adsorption of water-acetonitrile mixtures to model silica surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117:6620-6631.
22. Mountain R. Molecular dynamics simulation of water-acetonitrile mixtures in a silica slit. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117:3923-3929.
23. Melnikov S.M., Höltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. A molecular dynamics study on the partitioning mechanism in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51:6251-6254.
24. Melnikov S.M., Höltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. Composition, structure, and mobility of water-acetonitrile mixtures in a silica nanopore studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:2569-2575.
25. Melnikov S.M., Höltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. Influence of residual silanol groups on solvent and ion distribution at a chemically modified silica surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113:9230-9238.
26. McCalley D., Neue U. Estimation of the extent of the water-rich layer associated with the silica surface in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1192:225-229.
27. Kazakevich Y. High-performance liquid chromatography retention mechanisms and their mathematical descriptions. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1126:232-243.
28. Lindsey R.K., Rafferty J.L., Eggimann B.L., Siepmann J., Schure M.R. Molecular simulation studies of reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1287:60-82.
29. Rafferty J.L., Siepmann J., Schure M.R. Mobile phase effects in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: a comparison of acetonitrile/water and methanol/water solvents as studied by molecular simulation. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2203-2213.
30. Karatapanis A.E., Fiamegos Y.C., Stalikas C.D. A revisit to the retention mechanism of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using model organic compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2871-2879.
31. Greco G., Letzel T. Main interactions and influences of the chromatographic parameters in HILIC separations. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2013, 51:684-693.
32. McCalley D. Study of the selectivity, retention mechanisms and performance of alternative silica-based stationary phases for separation of ionised solutes in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3408-3417.
33. Dinh N.P., Jonsson T., Irgum K. Water uptake on polar stationary phases under conditions for hydrophilic interaction chromatography and its relation to solute retention. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1320:33-47.
34. Dinh N.P., Jonsson T., Irgum K. Probing the interaction mode in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:5880-5891.
35. Bicker W., Wu J., Yeman H., Albert K., Lindner W. Retention and selectivity effects caused by bonding of a polar urea-type ligand to silica: a study on mixed-mode retention mechanisms and the pivotal role of solute-silanol interactions in the hydrophilic interaction chromatography elution mode. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:882-895.
36. Knox J., McLaren L. A new gas chromatographic method for measuring gaseous diffusion coefficients and obstructive factors. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36:1477-1482.
37. Knox J., Scott H. B-term and C-term in the van Deemter equation for liquid-chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1983, 282:297-313.
38. 18-bonded silica particles on the obstructive factor and intraparticle diffusion mechanism. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61:7636-7650.
39. Landauer R. Electrical resistance of binary metallic mixtures. J. Appl. Phys. 1952, 23:779-784.
40. Davis H. The effective medium theory of diffusion in composite media. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1977, 60:499-501.
41. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Theoretical investigation of diffusion along columns packed with fully and superficially porous particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:3476-3488.
42. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Diffusion models in chromatographic columns packed with fully and superficially porous particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:3773-3791.
43. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Importance of sample intraparticle diffusivity in investigations of the mass transfer mechanism in liquid chromatography. AIChE J. 2011, 57:346-358.
44. Torquato S. Effective electrical conductivity of two-phase disordered composite media. J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 58:3790-3797.
45. Torquato S. Random Heterogeneous Materials. Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties 2002, Springer, New York.
46. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Experimental validation of physico-chemical models of effective diffusion in chromatographic columns packed with superficially porous particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:4179-6188.
47. Lianeuski H., Hlushkou D., Khirevich S., Höltzel A., Tallarek U., Torquato S. Impact of microstructure on the effective diffusivity in random packings of hard spheres. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116:034904.
48. Gritti F., Guiochon G. New insights on mass transfer kinetics in chromatography. AIChE J. 2011, 57:333-345.
49. Li J., Carr P. Accuracy of empirical correlations for estimating diffusion coefficients in aqueous organic mixtures. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:2530-2536.
50. Li J., Carr P. Estimating diffusion coefficients for alkylbenzenes and alkylphenones in aqueous mixtures with acetonitrile and methanol. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69:2550-2553.
51. Aris R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1956, 235:67-77.
52. Taylor G. Dispersion of solute matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1953, 219:186-203.
53. Taylor G. Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1954, 225:473-477.
54. Janssen L. Axial-dispersion in laminar-flow through coiled tubes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1976, 31:215-218.
55. Gritti F., Shiner S., Fairchild J., Guiochon G. Evaluation of the kinetic performance of new prototype 2.1mm×100mm narrow-bore columns packed with 1.6μm superficially porous particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1334:30-43.
56. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Comparison between the intra-particle diffusivity in the hydrophilic interaction chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography modes. impact on the column efficiency. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1297:85-95.
57. 18 particles a detailed investigation of the intra-particle diffusivity. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1355:164-178.
58. Miyabe K., Ando N., Guiochon G. Peak parking method for measurement of molecular diffusivity in liquid phase systems. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:4377-4382.
59. Miyabe K., Matsumoto Y., Guiochon G. Peak parking-moment analysis. a strategy for the study of the mass-transfer kinetics in the stationary phase. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79:1970-1982.
60. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Mass transfer kinetics, band broadening and column efficiency. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1221:2-40.
61. Gritti F., Guiochon G. A protocol for the measurement of all the parameters of the mass transfer kinetics in columns used in liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:5137-5151.
62. Ganguly S., Kundu K. Protonation/deprotonation energetics of uracil, thymine, and cytosine in water from E.M.F./spectrophotometric measurements. Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72:1120-1126.
63. Méndez A., Bosch E., Rosés M., Neue U. Comparison of the acidity of residual silanol groups in several liquid chromatography columns. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 986:33-44.
64. Grumbach E.S., Diehl D.M., Neue U.D. The application of novel 1.7μm ethylene bridged hybrid particles for hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31:1511-1518.