Time and methodological choices

Time and Work: How Time Impacts Groups, Organizations and Methodological Choices

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 146-176

  Chan, David ^a  

^a SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920819037     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315798370     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy ofManagement Review, 26, 512-529.
2. Beal, D. J., & Ghandour, L. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 526-546.
3. Beal, D. J., Trougakos, J. P., Weiss, H. M., & Dalai, R. S. (2013). Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 593-605.
4. Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5. Bluedorn, A. C, Kalliah, T. J., Strube, M. I, & Martin, G. D. (1998). Polychronicity and the inventory polychrome values (IPV). Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205-230.
6. Bluedorn, A. C, Kaufman, C. F., & Lance, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochromic and polychromic time. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 17-26.
7. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314.
8. Cahoon, D., & Edmonds, E. M. (1980). The watched pot still won't boil: Expectancy as a variable in estimating the passage of time. Bulleting of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 115-116.
9. Chan, D. (1998a). The conceptualization of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal means and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 183-421.
10. Chan, D. (1998b). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
11. Chan, D. (2002). Longitudinal modeling. In S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology(pp. 412–130). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Chan, D. (2003). Data analysis and modeling longitudinal processes. Group and Organization Management, 28, 341-365.
13. Chan, D. (2011). Longitudinal assessment of changes in job performance and work attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 26, 93-117.
14. Chan, D. Ramey, S., Ramey, C, & Schmitt, N. (2000). Modeling intraindividual changes in children's social skills at home and at school: A multivariate latent growth approach to understanding between-settings differences in children's social skills development. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 365-396.
15. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190-210.
16. Conte, J. M., Mathieu, J. E., & Landy, F. J. (1998). The nomological and predictive validity of time urgency. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 19, 1-13.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
18. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497-527.
19. Duncan, S. C, Duncan, T. E., & Hops, H. (1996). Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 236-248.
20. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155-174.
21. Epel, E. S., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influence of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 575-596.
22. Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf
23. Friedman, W. (1990). About time: Inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Greenberg, J. (2002). Time urgency and job performance: Field evidence of an interaction-ist perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1964-1973.
25. Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life. New York: Doubleday.
26. Harber, K. D., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255-264.
27. Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2005). Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person-job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at atime? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 155-178.
28. Javidan, M. (1984). The impact of environmental uncertainty on long-range planning practices of the U.S. savings and loan industry. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 381-392.
29. Jenkins, C. D., Zyzanski, S. J., & Rosenman, R. H. (1971). Progress toward validation of a computer-scored test for the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine, 33, 193-202.
30. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology(pp. 3-25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149-164.
32. Landy, F J., Rastegary, H, Thayer, J., & Colvin, C. (1991). Time urgency: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 644-657.
33. Levine, R. (1997). A geography of time: The temporal misadventures of a social psychologist. New York: Basic.
34. Levine, R. V, & Norenzayan, A. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 178-205.
35. Lindsay, W. M., & Rue, L. W. (1980). Impact of organization environment on the long-range planning process: A contingency view. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 104-385.
36. Madjar, N, & Oldham, G. R. (2006). Task rotation and polychronicity: Effects on individuals' creativity. Human Performance, 19, 117-131.
37. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, ľh-ĄĄ.
38. Mitchell, T R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy ofManagement Review, 26, 530-547.
39. Onken, M. H. (1999). Temporal elements of organizational culture and impact on firm performance. Journal ofManagerial Psychology, 14, 231-244.
40. Orbell, S., & Kyriakaki, M. (2008). Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behavior: Moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use. Health Psychology, 27, 110-119.
41. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94-120.
42. Richard, R., vanderPigt, J., & de Vries, N. K. (1996). Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 185-199.
43. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
44. Rogosa, D. R. (1995). Myths and methods: –Myths about longitudinal research— plus supplemental questions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change(pp. 3-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1-22.
46. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Slocombe, T. E., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit poly chronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 75-99.
48. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
49. Tay, L., Chan, D., & Diener, E. (in press). The metrics of societal happiness. Social Indicators Research.
50. Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., & Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress-coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 118-125.
51. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.