Interplay between E. coli DnaK, ClpB and GrpE during protein disaggregation

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 427, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 312-327

  Doyle, Shannon M ^a   Shastry, Shankar ^a   Kravats, Andrea N ^a   Shih, Yu Hsuan ^b   Miot, Marika ^a,c   Hoskins, Joel R ^a   Stan, George ^b   Wickner, Sue ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO GULBENKIAN DE CIÊNCIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

GrpE; Hsp40; Molecular chaperone; Nucleotide exchange factor; Protein disaggregation

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ADENYLATE CYCLASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BETA GALACTOSIDASE; CHAPERONE; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 104; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 40; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; MONOMER; PROTEIN CLPB; PROTEIN DNAK; PROTEIN GRPE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CLPB PROTEIN, E COLI; DNAK PROTEIN, E COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; GRPE PROTEIN, E COLI; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HSP104 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN AGGREGATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SSA1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BORDETELLA PERTUSSIS; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA BINDING; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLUORESCENCE ANISOTROPY; HEAT TOLERANCE; HYDROLYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN DISAGGREGATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN REFOLDING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; YEAST CELL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84920812183     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: 10898638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Mayer MP, Bukau B. Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005;62:670-84.
2. Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu Rev Biochem 2013;82:323-55.
3. Zuiderweg ER, Bertelsen EB, Rousaki A, Mayer MP, Gestwicki JE, et al. Allostery in the Hsp70 chaperone proteins. Top Curr Chem 2013;328:99-153.
4. Kampinga HH, Craig EA. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:579-92.
5. Harrison C. GrpE, a nucleotide exchange factor for DnaK. Cell Stress Chaperones 2003;8:218-24.
6. Genest O, Hoskins JR, Camberg JL, Doyle SM, Wickner S. Heat shock protein 90 from Escherichia coli collaborates with the DnaK chaperone system in client protein remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:8206-11.
7. Goloubinoff P, Mogk A, Zvi AP, Tomoyasu T, Bukau B. Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:13732-7.
8. Zolkiewski M. ClpB cooperates with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE in suppressing protein aggregation. A novel multi-chaperone system from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1999;274:28083-6.
9. Flaherty KM, DeLuca-Flaherty C, McKay DB. Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70 K heat-shock cognate protein. Nature 1990;346:623-8.
10. Zhu X, Zhao X, Burkholder WF, Gragerov A, Ogata CM, GottesmanME, et al. Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 1996;272:1606-14.
11. Gassler CS, Buchberger A, Laufen T, Mayer MP, Schroder H, Valencia A, et al. Mutations in the DnaK chaperone affecting interaction with the DnaJ cochaperone. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 1998;A95:15229-34.
12. Harrison CJ, Hayer-Hartl M, Di Liberto M, Hartl F, Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the nucleotide exchange factor GrpE bound to the ATPase domain of the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 1997;276:431-5.
13. Suh WC, Burkholder WF, Lu CZ, Zhao X, Gottesman ME, Gross CA. Interaction of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone. DnaK, with its cochaperone DnaJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:15223-8.
14. Kityk R, Kopp J, Sinning I, Mayer MP. Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol Cell 2012;48:863-74.
15. Qi R, Sarbeng EB, Liu Q, Le KQ, Xu X, Xu H, et al. Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013;20:900-7.
16. Zhuravleva A, Clerico EM, Gierasch LM. An interdomain energetic tug-of-war creates the allosterically active state in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Cell 2012;151:1296-307.
17. Zhuravleva A, Gierasch LM. Allosteric signal transmission in the nucleotide-binding domain of 70-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp70) molecular chaperones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:6987-92.
18. Bertelsen EB, Chang L, Gestwicki JE, Zuiderweg ER. Solution conformation of wild-type E. coli Hsp70 (DnaK) chaperone complexed with ADP and substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:8471-6.
19. Schlecht R, Erbse AH, Bukau B, Mayer MP. Mechanics of Hsp70 chaperones enables differential interaction with client proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011;18:345-51.
20. Schweizer RS, Aponte RA, Zimmermann S, Weber A, Reinstein J. Fine tuning of a biological machine: DnaK gains improved chaperone activity by altered allosteric communication and substrate binding. Chembiochem 2011;12:1559-73.
21. Glover JR, Lindquist S. Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 1998;94:73-82.
22. Doyle SM, Genest O, Wickner S. Protein rescue from aggregates by powerful molecular chaperone machines. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013;14:617-29.
23. Krzewska J, Langer T, Liberek K. Mitochondrial Hsp78, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cooperates with Hsp70 in protein refolding. FEBS Lett 2001;489:92-6.
24. Rosenzweig R, Moradi S, Zarrine-Afsar A, Glover JR, Kay LE. Unraveling the mechanism of protein disaggregation through a ClpB-DnaK interaction. Science 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1233066.
25. Miot M, Reidy M, Doyle SM, Hoskins JR, Johnston DM, Genest, et al. Species-specific collaboration of heat shock proteins (Hsp) 70 and 100 in thermotolerance and protein disaggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:6915-20.
26. Seyffer F, Kummer E, Oguchi Y, Winkler J, Kumar M, Zahn R, et al. Hsp70 proteins bind Hsp100 regulatory M domains to activate AAA + disaggregase at aggregate surfaces. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012;19:1347-55.
27. Lee J, Kim JH, Biter AB, Sielaff B, Lee S, Tsai FT. Heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 is an activator of the Hsp104 motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:8513-8.
28. Reidy M, Miot M, Masison DC. Prokaryotic chaperones support yeast prions and thermotolerance and define disaggregation machinery interactions. Genetics 2012;192:185-93.
29. Kabani M, Beckerich JM, Brodsky JL. Nucleotide exchange factor for the yeast Hsp70 molecular chaperone Ssa1p. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:4677-89.
30. Levy EJ, McCarty J, Bukau B, Chirico WJ. Conserved ATPase and luciferase refolding activities between bacteria and yeast Hsp70 chaperones andmodulators. FEBS Lett 1995;368:435-40.
31. Doyle SM, Hoskins JR, Wickner S. Collaboration between the ClpB AAA+ remodeling protein and the DnaK chaperone system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:11138-44.
32. Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D. A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5752-6.
33. Weibezahn J, Schlieker C, Bukau B, Mogk A. Characterization of a trap mutant of the AAA+ chaperone ClpB. J Biol Chem 2003;278:32608-17.
34. Wickner S, Gottesman S, Skowyra D, Hoskins J, McKenney K, MauriziMR. A molecular chaperone. ClpA, functions like DnaK and DnaJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:12218-22.
35. 2+ in RepA monomerization by DnaJ and DnaK. J Biol Chem 1993;268:25296-301.
36. Sugimoto S, Saruwatari K, Higashi C, Sonomoto K. The proper ratio of GrpE to DnaK is important for protein quality control by the DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE chaperone system and for cell division. Microbiology 2008;154:1876-85.
37. Grimshaw JP, Siegenthaler RK, Zuger S, Schonfeld HJ, Z'Graggen BR, Christen P. The heat-sensitive Escherichia coli grpE280 phenotype: impaired interaction of GrpE(G122D) with DnaK. J Mol Biol 2005;353:888-96.
38. Packschies L, Theyssen H, Buchberger A, Bukau B, Goody RS, Reinstein J. GrpE accelerates nucleotide exchange of the molecular chaperone DnaK with an associative displacement mechanism. Biochemistry 1997;36:3417-22.
39. Brehmer D, Gassler C, Rist W, Mayer MP, Bukau B. Influence of GrpE on DnaK-substrate interactions. J Biol Chem 2004;279:27957-64.
40. Sielaff B, Tsai FT. The M-domain controls Hsp104 protein remodeling activity in an Hsp70/Hsp40-dependent manner. J Mol Biol 2010;402:30-7.
41. DeSantis ME, Leung EH, Sweeny EA, Jackrel ME, Cushman-Nick M, Neuhaus-Follini A, et al. Operational plasticity enables hsp104 to disaggregate diverse amyloid and nonamyloid clients. Cell 2012;151:778-93.
42. Haslbeck M, Miess A, Stromer T, Walter S, Buchner J. Disassembling protein aggregates in the yeast cytosol. The cooperation of Hsp26 with Ssa1 and Hsp104. J Biol Chem 2005;280:23861-8.
43. Lee S, Sowa ME, Watanabe YH, Sigler PB, Chiu W, Yoshida M, et al. The structure of ClpB: a molecular chaperone that rescues proteins from an aggregated state. Cell 2003;115:229-40.
44. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
45. Desantis ME, Sweeny EA, Snead D, Leung EH, Go MS, Gupta K, et al. Conserved distal loop residues in the Hsp104 and ClpB middle domain contact nucleotide-binding domain 2 and enable Hsp70-dependent protein disaggregation. J Biol Chem 2014;289:848-67.
46. Oguchi Y, Kummer E, Seyffer F, Berynskyy M, Anstett B, Zahn R, et al. A tightly regulated molecular toggle controls AAA + disaggregase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012;19:1338-46.
47. Carroni M, Kummer E, Oguchi Y, Wendler P, Clare DK, Sinning I, et al. Head-to-tail interactions of the coiled-coil domains regulate ClpB activity and cooperation with Hsp70 in protein disaggregation. eLife 2014;3:e02481.
48. Battesti A, Bouveret E. Acyl carrier protein/SpoT interaction, the switch linking SpoT-dependent stress response to fatty acid metabolism. Mol Microbiol 2006;62:1048-63.
49. Wickner S, Hoskins J, McKenney K. Monomerization of RepA dimers by heat shock proteins activates binding to DNA replication origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:7903-7.
50. Hoskins JR, Singh SK, Maurizi MR, Wickner S. Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:8892-7.
51. Barnett ME, Zolkiewski M. Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved charged amino acid residues in ClpB from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 2002;41:11277-83.
52. Cyr DM, Lu X, Douglas MG. Regulation of Hsp70 function by a eukaryotic DnaJ homolog. J Biol Chem 1992;267:20927-31.
53. Shacter E, Chock PB, Stadtman ER. Energy consumption in a cyclic phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cascade. J Biol Chem 1984;259:12260-4.
54. Zubay G, Morse DE, Schrenk WJ, Miller JH. Detection and isolation of the repressor protein for the tryptophan operon of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1972;69:1100-3.
55. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:40.
56. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-12.
57. PyMOL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Schrodinger, LLC; 2006.
58. Glynn SE, Martin A, Nager AR, Baker TA, Sauer RT. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotidedependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 2009;139:744-56.
59. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
60. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein - protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W96-9.
61. Kozakov D, Beglov D, Bohnuud T, Mottarella SE, Xia B, Hall DR, et al. How good is automated protein docking? Proteins 2013;81:2159-66.
62. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406.
63. Porollo A, Meller J. Prediction-based fingerprints of protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2007;66:630-45.
64. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
65. Miller S, Janin J, Lesk AM, Chothia C. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1987;196:641-56.