Behavioral aspects of chickadee hybridization

Ecology and Behavior of Chickadees and Titmice: An Integrated Approach

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Curry, Robert L ^a   Rossano, Lindsay M ^b   Reudink, Matthew W ^c  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Mid Atlantic Associates Inc   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bird behaviour; Chickadees; Genetics; Hybridization; Paridae; Pennsylvania; Song patterns

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920753618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569992.003.0008     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Baker, M. C., Baker, M. S. A., and Gammon, D. E. (2003). Vocal ontogeny of nestling and fledgling black-capped chickadees Poecile atricapilla in natural populations. Bioacoustics, 13, 265-296.
2. Banks, R. C., Cicero, C., Dunn, J. L., Kratter, A. W., Rasmussen, P. C., Remsen, J. V., Jr, Rising, J. D., and Stotz, D. F. (2002). Forty-third supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-list of North American Birds. Auk, 119, 897-906.
3. Braun, M. J. and Robbins, M. B. (1986). Extensive protein similarity of the hybridizing chickadees Parus atricapillus and P. carolinensis. Auk, 103, 667-675.
4. Bronson, C. L., Grubb, T. C., Jr, and Braun, M. J. (2003a). A test of the endogenous and exogenous selection hypothesis for the maintenance of a narrow avian hybrid zone. Evolution, 57, 630-637.
5. Bronson, C. L., Grubb, T. C., Jr, Sattler, G. D., and Braun, M. J. (2003b). Mate preference: a possible causal mechanism for a moving hybrid zone. Animal Behaviour, 65, 489-500.
6. Bronson, C. L., Grubb, T. C., Jr, Sattler, G. D., and Braun, M. J. (2005). Reproductive success across the black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and Carolina chickadee (P. carolinensis) hybrid zone in Ohio: implications for characterization of hybrid zones based on genetic indices. Auk, 122, 759-772.
7. Charrier, I. and Sturdy, C. B. (2005). Call-based species recognition in blackcapped chickadees. Behavioral Processes, 70, 271-281.
8. Cicero, C. (1996). Sibling species of titmice in the Parus inornatus complex. University of California Publications in Zoology, 128, 1-217.
9. Cicero, C. (2000). Oak titmouse (Baeolophus inornatus) and juniper titmouse (Baeolophus ridgwayi). In: Poole, A. and Gill, F., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 485, pp. 1-28. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia.
10. Cicero, C. (2004). Barriers to sympatry between avian sibling species (Paridae: Baeolophus) in local secondary contact. Evolution, 58, 1573-1587.
11. Cockrum, E. L. (1952). A check-list and bibliography of hybrid birds in North America north of Mexico. Wilson Bulletin, 64, 140-159.
12. Crock, M. A. (1975). Competition and Chickadee Vocalizations: Displacement and Convergence. M.S. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
13. Curry, R. L. (2005). Hybridization in chickadees: much to learn from familiar birds. Auk, 122, 747-758.
14. Ficken, M. S., McLaren, M. A., and Hailman, J. P. (1996). Boreal Chickadee. In: Poole, A. and Gill, F. B., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 254, pp. 1-23. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
15. Gill, F. B., Slikas, B., and Sheldon, F. H. (2005). Phylogeny of titmice (Paridae): II. Species relationships based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Auk, 122, 121-143.
16. Grant, P. R. and Grant, B. R. (1997). Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. American Naturalist, 149, 1-28.
17. Grubb, T. C., Jr, and Bronson, C. L. (1995). Artificial snags as nesting sites for chickadees. Condor, 97, 1067-1070.
18. Hailman, J. P. and Ficken, M. S. (1996). Comparative analysis of vocal repertoires, with reference to chickadees. In: Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H., eds. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, pp. 136-159. Comstock/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
19. Hailman, J. P. and Haftorn, S. (1995). Siberian tit. In: Poole, A. and Gill, F., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 196, pp. 1-24. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
20. Hansen, B. T. and Slagsvold, T. (2003). Rival imprinting: interspecifically cross-fostered tits defend their territories against heterospecific intruders. Animal Behaviour, 65, 1117-1123.
21. Hansen, B. T. and Slagsvold, T. (2004). Early learning affects social dominance: interspecifically cross-fostered tits become subdominant. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 262-268.
22. Hansen, M. M., Ruzzante, D. E., Nielsen, E. E., and Mensberg, K.-L. E. (2000). Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism reveals life-history dependent interbreeding between hatchery and wild brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Molecular Ecology, 9, 583-594.
23. Harrap, S. and Quinn, D. (1995). Chickadees, Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
24. Hill, B. G. and Lein, M. R. (1989). Territory overlap and habitat use of sympatric chickadees. Auk, 106, 259-268.
25. Irwin, D. E. and Price, T. (1999). Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity, 82, 347-352.
26. Järvinen, A. (1997). Interspecific hybridization between the Siberian tit Parus cinctus and the willow tit Parus montanus produces fertile offspring. Ornis Fennica, 74, 149-152.
27. Johannessen, L. E., Slagsvold, T., Hansen, B. T., and Lifjeld, J. T. (2005). Manipulation of male quality in wild tits: effects on paternity loss. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 747-754.
28. Johnston, D. W. (1971). Ecological aspects of hybridizing chickadees (Parus) in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist, 85, 124-134.
29. Kroodsma, D. E., Albano, D. J., Houlihan, P. W., and Wells, J. A. (1995). Song development by black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) and Carolina chickadees (P. carolinensis). Auk, 112, 29-43.
30. Kroodsma, D. E., Byers, B. E., Halkin, S. L., Hill, C., Minis, D., Bolsinger, J. R., Dawson, J.-A., Donelan, E., Farrington, J., Gill, F. B., Houlihan, P., Innes, D., Keller, G., Macaulay, L., Marantz, C. A., Ortiz, J., Stoddard, P. K., and Wilda, K. (1999). Geographic variation in black-capped chickadee songs and singing behavior. Auk, 116, 387-402.
31. Kvist, L., Ruokonen, M., Orell, M., and Lumme, J. (1996). Evolutionary patterns and phylogeny of tits and chickadees (genus Parus) based on the sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Ornis Fennica, 73, 145-156.
32. Löhrl, H. (1994). Contribution to the still unsettled question complex of hybridization between coal tit and black-crested tit (Parus ater, P. melanolophus) (Aves: Passeriformes: Paridae). Zoologische Abhandlungen (Dresden), 48, 149-157.
33. Mammen, D. L. and Nowicki, S. (1981). Individual differences and within-flock convergence in chickadee calls. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 179-186.
34. Martens, J. (1996). Vocalizations and speciation of palearctic birds. In: Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H., eds. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, pp. 221-240. Comstock/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
35. Martens, J. and Schottler, B. (1991). Acoustic barriers between azure tit Parus cyanus and blue tit Parus caeruleus? Journal für Ornithologie, 132, 61-80.
36. McCarthy, E. M. (2006). Handbook of avian hybrids of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. McCallum (1998). Mountain chickadee. In: Poole, A. and Gill, F. B., eds. Birds of North America, No. 254, pp. 1-28. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
38. Mostrom, A. M., Curry, R. L., and Lohr, B. (2002). Carolina chickadee. In: Poole, A. and Gill, F., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 636, pp. 1-28. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia.
39. Nocedal, J. and Ficken, M. (1998). Bridled titmouse. In: Poole, A. and Gill, F., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 375, pp. 1-20. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia.
40. Nowicki, S. (1989). Vocal plasticity in captive black-capped chickadees: the acoustic basis and rate of call convergence. Animal Behaviour, 37, 64-73.
41. Nowicki, S. and Searcy, W. A. (2005). Song and mate choice in birds: how the development of behavior helps us understand function. Auk, 122, 1-14.
42. Päckert, M., Martens, J., Eck, S., Nazarenko, A. A., Valchuk, O. P., Petri, B., and Veith, M. (2005). The great tit (Parus major)-a misclassified ring species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 86, 153-174.
43. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
44. Randler, C. (2002). Avian hybridization, mixed pairing and female choice. Animal Behaviour, 63, 103-119.
45. Reudink, M. W., Mech, S. G., and Curry, R. L. (2006). Extra-pair paternity and mate choice in a chickadee hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 56-62.
46. Reudink, M. W., Mech, S. G., Mullen, S. P. and Curry, R. L. (2007). Structure and dynamics of the hybrid zone between Black-capped and Carolina chickadees in southeastern Pennsylvania. Auk, 124, in press.
47. Robbins, M. B., Braun, M. J., and Tobey, E. A. (1986). Morphological and vocal variation across a contact zone between the chickadees Parus atricapillus and P. carolinensis. Auk, 103, 655-666.
48. Rossano, L. M. (2003). Vocal Patterns of Black-Capped and Carolina Chickadees Hybridization in Southeastern Pennsylvania. M.S. thesis, Department of Biology, Villanova University.
49. Salzburger, W., Martens, J., and Sturmbauer, C. (2002). Paraphyly of the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) suggested from cytochrome b sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 24, 19-25.
50. Sattler, E. D. (1996). The Dynamics of Vocal, Morphological and Molecular Interaction Between Hybridizing Black-Capped and Carolina Chickadees (Parus atricapillus, Parus carolinensis). Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland.
51. Sattler, G. D. and Braun, M. J. (2000). Morphometric variation as an indicator of genetic interactions between black-capped and Carolina chickadees at a contact zone in the Appalachian Mountains. Auk, 117, 427-444.
52. Sawaya, P. L. (1990). A Detailed Analysis of the Genetic Interaction at a Hybrid Zone Between the Chickadees Parus atricapillus and P. carolinensis as Revealed by Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Fragment Length Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati.
53. Slagsvold, T. and Hansen, B. T. (2001). Sexual imprinting and the origin of obligate brood parasitism in birds. American Naturalist, 158, 534-367.
54. Slagsvold, T., Hansen, B. T., Johannessen, L. E., and Lifjeld, J. T. (2002). Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 1449-1455.
55. Smith, S. M. (1993). Black-capped chickadee. In: Poole, A., Stettenheim, P., and Gill, F., eds. The Birds of North America, No. 39, pp. 1-18. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
56. Smith, S. T. (1972). Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, 11, 1-125.
57. ten Cate, C. and Vos, D. R. (1999). Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 28, 1-31.
58. Ward, R. (1966). Regional variation in the song of the Carolina chickadee. Living Bird, 5, 127-150.
59. Ward, R. and Ward, D. A. (1974). Songs in contiguous populations of blackcapped and Carolina chickadees in Pennsylvania. Wilson Bulletin, 86, 344-356.
60. Weisman, R. and Ratcliffe, L. (1989). Absolute and relative pitch processing in black-capped chickadees, Parus atricapillus. Animal Behaviour, 38, 685-692.