Rival imprinting: Interspecifically cross-fostered tits defend their territories against heterospecific intruders

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1117-1123

  Hansen, Bo T ^a   Slagsvold, Tore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; MATE CHOICE; PASSERINE; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

PARUS ATER; PARUS CAERULEUS; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 0041409761     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2146     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution, 40, 804-816.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bateson, P. P. G. 1966. The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Reviews, 41, 177-220.
5. Bischof, H. J. & Clayton, N. 1991. Stabilization of sexual preferences by sexual experience in male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata castanotis. Behaviour, 118, 144-155.
6. Bolhuis, J. J. 1991. Mechanisms of avian imprinting: a review. Biological Reviews, 66, 303-345.
7. Bolles, R. C. & Beecher, M. D. 1988. Evolution and Learning. London: L. Erlbaum.
8. Brandtmann, G., Scandura, M. & Trillmich, F. 1999. Female-female conflict in the harem of a snail cichlid (Lamprologus ocellatus): behavioural interactions and fitness consequences. Behaviour, 136, 1123-1144.
9. Catchpole, C. K. & Slater, P. J. B. 1995. Bird Song. Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Crook, J. H. 1963. Comparative studies on the reproductive behaviour of two closely related weaver bird species (Ploceus cucullatus and Ploceus nigerrimus) and their races. Behaviour, 21, 177-232.
11. Emlen, S. T., Rising, J. D. & Thompson, W. L. 1975. A behavioral and morphological study of sympatry in the indigo and lazuli buntings of the great plains. Wilson Bulletin, 87, 145-179.
12. Gottlieb, G. 1971. Development of Species Identification in Birds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Grant, B. R. & Grant, P. R. 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution, 50, 2471-2487.
14. Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. 1997. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. American Naturalist, 149, 1-28.
15. Haftorn, S. 1993. Is the coal tit Parus ater really the most subordinate of the Scandinavian tits? Ornis Scandinavica, 24, 335-338.
16. Immelmann, K. 1969. Über den Einfluss frühkindlicher Erfahrungen auf die geschlechtliche Objektfixierung bei Estrildiden. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 26, 677-691.
17. Immelmann, K. 1972. Sexual and other long-term aspects of imprinting in birds and other species. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 4, 147-174.
18. Immelmann, K., Pröve, R., Lassek, R. & Bischof, H. J. 1991. Influence of adult courtship experience on the development of sexual preferences in zebra finch males. Animal Behaviour, 42, 83-89.
19. Irwin, D. E. & Price, T. 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity, 82, 347-354.
20. Kemp, D. J. & Wiklund, C. 2001. Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 429-442.
21. Kendrick, K. M., Hinton, M. R., Atkins, K., Haupt, M. A. & Skinner, J. D. 1998. Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature, 395, 229-230.
22. Krokene, C., Rigstad, K., Dale, M. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1998. The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behavioral Ecology, 9, 649-656.
23. Kroodsma, R. L. 1974. Species-recognition behavior of territorial male rose-breasted and black-headed grosbeaks (Pheucticus). Auk, 91, 54-64.
24. Kruijt, J. P. & Meeuwissen, G. B. 1991. Sexual preferences of male zebra finches: effects of early and adult experience. Animal Behaviour, 42, 91-102.
25. Kruijt, J. P. & Meeuwissen, G. B. 1993. Consolidation and modification of sexual preferences in adult male zebra finches. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 43, 68-79.
26. Kruijt, J. P., Bossema, I. & Lammers, G. J. 1982. Effects of early experience and male activity on mate choice in mallard females (Anas platyrhynchos). Behaviour, 80, 32-43.
27. Kruijt, J. P., ten Cate, C. J. & Meeuwissen, G. B. 1983. The influence of siblings on the development of sexual preferences of male zebra finches. Developmental Psychobiology, 16, 233-239.
28. Laland, K. N. 1994. On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution, 48, 477-489.
29. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 78, 3721-3725.
30. Lynch, A. & Baker, A. J. 1990. Increased vocal discrimination by learning in sympatry in two species of chaffinches. Behaviour, 116, 109-126.
31. Penn, D. & Potts, W. 1998. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 1299-1306.
32. Perrins, C. M. 1979. British Tits. London: Collins.
33. Price, T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 353, 251-260.
34. Ratcliffe, L. M. & Grant, P. R. 1983. Species recognition in Darwin's finches (Geospiza, Gould). I. Discrimination by morphological cues. Animal Behaviour, 31, 1139-1153.
35. Sheldon, F. H., Slikas, B., Kinnarney, M., Gill, F. B., Zhao, E. & Silverin, B. 1992. DNA-DNA hybridization evidence of phylogenetic relationships among major lineages of Parus. Auk, 109, 173-185.
36. Slagsvold, T. & Lifjeld, J. T. 1994. Polygyny in birds: the role of competition between females for male parental care. American Naturalist, 143, 59-94.
37. Slagsvold, T. & Hansen, B. T. 2001. Sexual imprinting and the origin of obligate brood parasitism in birds. American Naturalist, 158, 354-367.
38. Slagsvold, T., Hansen, B. T., Johannessen, L. E. & Lifjeld, J. T. 2002. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 1449-1455.
39. ten Cate, C. 1984. The influence of social relations on the development of species recognition in zebra finch males. Behaviour, 91, 263-285.
40. ten Cate, C. & Vos, D. R. 1999. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 28, 1-31.
41. ten Cate, C., Los, L. & Schilperoord, L. 1984. The influence of differences in social experience on the development of species recognition in zebra finch males. Animal Behaviour, 32, 852-860.
42. ten Cate, C., Hilbers, J. & Hall, M. 1992. Sexual imprinting in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Behaviour, 122, 41-55.
43. Vos, D. R. 1994. Sex recognition in zebra finch males results from early experience. Behaviour, 128, 1-14.