Manipulation of male quality in wild tits: Effects on paternity loss

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 747-754

  Johannessen, Lars Erik ^a   Slagsvold, Tore ^a   Hansen, Bo Terning ^a   Lifjeld B, Jan T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cross fostering; Early learning; Extrapair paternity; Microsatellite; Sexual imprinting; Social rearing conditions

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DOMINANCE; PASSERINE; PATERNITY;

AVES; PARUS CAERULEUS; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 25444453546     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ari048     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bensch S, Price T, Kohn J, 1997. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in a Phylloscopus warbler. Mol Ecol 6:91-92.
2. Burley N, Krantzberg G, Radman P, 1982. Influence of colour-banding on the conspecific preferences of zebra finches. Anim Behav 30: 444-455.
3. Charmantier A, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM, 2004. Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? J Avian Biol 35:524-532.
4. Chuang-Dobbs HC, Webster MS, Holmes RT, 2001. Paternity and parental care in the black-throated blue warbler, Dendroica caerulescens. Anim Behav 62:83-92.
5. Dawson DA, Hanotte O, Greig C, Stewart IRK, Burke T, 2000. Polymorphic microsatellites in the blue tit Parus caeruleus and their cross-species utility in 20 songbird families. Mol Ecol 9:1941-1944.
6. Delhey K, Johnsen A, Peters A, Andersson S, Kempenaers B, 2003. Paternity analysis reveals opposing selection pressures on crown coloration in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 2057-2063.
7. Dickinson JL, 2001. Extrapair copulations in western bluebirds (Sialia mexicana): female receptivity favors older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:423-429.
8. Double MC, Cockburn A, 2003. Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:379-384.
9. Ellegren H, Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Primmer CR, 1995. Handicapped males and extrapair paternity in pied flycatchers: a study using microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 4:739-744.
10. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B, 2003. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425:714-717.
11. Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B, 2002. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1479-1485.
12. Fridolfsson A-K, Gyllensten UB, Jakobsson S, 1997. Microsatellite markers for paternity testing in the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus: high frequency of extra-pair young in an island population. Hereditas 126:127-132.
13. Gibson RM, Jewell PA, 1982. Semen quality, female choice and multiple mating in domestic sheep: a test of Trivers' sexual competence hypothesis. Behaviour 80:9-31.
14. Grant BR, Grant PR, 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution 50:2471-2487.
15. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA, 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195-2212.
16. Griffith SC, Stewart IRK, Dawson DA, Owens IPF, Burke T, 1999. Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an "island effect"? Biol J Linn Soc 68:303-316.
17. Gullberg A, Tegelström H, Gelter HP, 1992. DNA fingerprinting reveals multiple paternity in families of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus). Hereditas 117:103-108.
18. Hansen B, Slagsvold T, 2003. Rival imprinting: interspecifically cross-fostered tits defend their territories against heterospecific intruders. Anim Behav 65:1117-1123.
19. Hansen B, Slagsvold T, 2004. Early learning affects social dominance: interspecifically cross-fostered tits become subdominant. Behav Ecol 15:262-268.
20. Hasselquist D, Bensch S, von Schantz T, 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229-232.
21. Jennions MD, Petrie M, 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21-64.
22. Johnsen A, Fiske P, Amundsen T, Lifjeld JT, Rohde PA, 2000. Colour bands, mate choice and paternity in the bluethroat. Anim Behav 59: 111-119.
23. Johnson LS, Hicks BG, Masters BS, 2002. Increased cuckoldry as a cost of breeding late for male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behav Ecol 13:670-675.
24. Kempenaers B, Verheyen RF, Dhondt AA, 1997. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus raeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481-492.
25. Krokene C, Rigstad K, Dale M, Lifjeld JT, 1998. The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav Ecol 9:649-656.
26. Leech DI, Hartley IR, Stewart IRK, Griffith SC, Burke T, 2001. No effect of parental quality or extrapair paternity on brood sex ratio in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Behav Ecol 12:674-680.
27. Lubjuhn T, Strohbach S, Brün J, Gerken T, Epplen JT, 1999. Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major) - a long term study. Behaviour 136:1157-1172.
28. Martinez JG, Soler JJ, Soler M, Møller AP, Burke TBP, 1999. Comparative population structure and gene flow of a brood parasite, the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius), and its primary host, the magpie (Pica pica). Evolution 53:269-278.
29. Martin-Vivaldi M, Martinez JG, Palomino JJ, Soler M, 2002. Extrapair paternity in the hoopoe Upupa epops: an exploration of the influence of interactions between breeding pairs, non-pair males and strophe length. Ibis 144:236-247.
30. Møller AP, Ninni P, 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:345-358.
31. Otter K, Ratcliffe L, Boag PT, 1994. Extra-pair paternity in the black-capped chickadee. Condor 96:218-222.
32. Otter K, Ratcliffe L, Michaud D, Boag PT, 1998. Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:25-36.
33. Otter KA, Stewart IRK, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Dabelsteen T, Burke T, 2001. Extra-pair paternity among great tits Parus major following manipulation of male signals. J Avian Biol 32:338-344.
34. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL, 1998. Song learning in brood-parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata: song mimicry of the host species. Anim Behav 55:1537-1553.
35. Poston JP, Wiley RH, Westneat DF, 1999. Male rank, female breeding synchrony, and patterns of paternity in the boat-tailed grackle. Behav Ecol 10:444-451.
36. Richardson DS, Burke T, 1999. Extra-pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock's orioles. Mol Ecol 8:2115-2126.
37. Rätti O, Lundberg A, Tegelström H, Alatalo RV, 2001. No evidence for effects of breeding density and male removal on extrapair paternity in the pied flycatcher. Auk 118:147-155.
38. Sheldon BC, 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 257: 25-30.
39. Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, 2001. Sexual imprinting and the origin of obligate brood parasitism in birds. Am Nat 158:354-367.
40. Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, Johannessen LE, Lifjeld JT, 2002. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1449-1455.
41. Slagsvold T, Johnsen A, Lampe HM, Lifjeld JT, 2001. Do female pied flycatchers seek extrapair copulations with familiar males? A test of the incomplete knowledge hypothesis. Behav Ecol 12:412-418.
42. Strohbach S, Curio E, Bathen A, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T, 1998. Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the "good genes" hypothesis. Behav Ecol 9:388-396.
43. ten Cate C, Vos DR, Mann N, 1993. Sexual imprinting and song learning: two of one kind? Neth J Zool 43:34-45.
44. Thusius KJ, Dunn PO, Peterson KA, Whittingham LA, 2001. Extrapair paternity is influenced by breeding synchrony and density in the common yellowthroat. Behav Ecol 12:633-639.
45. Verboven N, Mateman AC, 1997. Low frequency of extra-pair fertilizations in the great tit Parus major revealed by DNA fingerprinting. J Avian Biol 28:231-239.
46. Wagner RH, Schug MD, Morton ES, 1996. Condition-dependent control of paternity by female purple martins: implications for coloniality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:379-389.
47. Weatherhead PJ, 1997. Breeding synchrony and extra-pair mating in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:151-158.
48. Webster MS, Chuang-Dobbs HC, Holmes RT, 2001. Microsatellite identification of extrapair sires in a socially monogamous warbler. Behav Ecol 12:439-446.
49. Westneat DF, 1987a. Extra-pair copulations in a predominantly monogamous bird: observations of behaviour. Anim Behav 35: 865-876.
50. Westneat DF, 1987b. Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav 35:877-886.
51. Westneat DF, Sherman PW, 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:205-215.
52. Westneat DF, Stewart IRK, 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:365-396.