Erratum: Divergent reprogramming routes lead to alternative stem-cell states (Nature (2014) 516 (192-197) DOI: 10.1038/nature14047);Divergent reprogramming routes lead to alternative stem-cell states

Nature

Volumn 516, Issue 7530, 2014, Pages 192-197

  Tonge, Peter D ^a   Corso, Andrew J ^a,b   Monetti, Claudio ^a   Hussein, Samer M I ^a   Puri, Mira C ^a,b   Michael, Iacovos P ^a,b   Li, Mira ^a   Lee, Dong Sung ^c   Mar, Jessica C ^d   Cloonan, Nicole ^e,i   Wood, David L ^e   Gauthier, Maely E ^e   Korn, Othmar ^e   Clancy, Jennifer L ^f   Preiss, Thomas ^f,g   Grimmond, Sean M ^e   Shin, Jong Yeon ^c,h   Seo, Jeong Sun ^c,h   Wells, Christine A ^e   Rogers, Ian M ^a,b   Nagy, Andras ^a,b   more..

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^f Biology and Environment   (Australia)

^g VICTOR CHANG CARDIAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^h Macrogen Inc   (South Korea)

ⁱ QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 3B; FIZZY RELATED PROTEIN; HELIX LOOP HELIX PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

DIFFERENTIATION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GERM CELL; MEMBRANE; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; DNA MODIFICATION; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN FIBROBLAST; SOMATIC CELL; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUDE MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSGENE;

MUS;

ANIMALS; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; HISTONE DEACETYLASES; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, NUDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSGENES;

EID: 84920743310     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14607     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
2. Nagy, A., Rossant, J., Nagy, R., Abramow-Newerly, W. & Roder, J. C. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8424-8428 (1993).
3. Zhao, X.-Y. et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461, 86-90 (2009).
4. Fussner, E. et al. Constitutive heterochromatin reorganization during somatic cell reprogramming. EMBO J. 30, 1778-1789 (2011).
5. Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377 (2009).
6. Chen, J. et al. H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nature Genet. 45, 34-42 (2013).
7. Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 467, 285-290 (2010).
8. Polo, J. M. et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 848-855 (2010).
9. Hu, X. et al. Tet and TDG mediate DNA demethylation essential for mesenchymalto-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 14, 512-522 (2014).
10. Mali, P. et al. Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. Stem Cells 28, 713-720 (2010).
11. Wang, T. et al. The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C-dependent manner. Cell Stem Cell 9, 575-587 (2011).
12. Mansour, A. A. et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature 488, 409-413 (2012).
13. Esteban, M. A. et al. Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 71-79 (2009).
14. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000).
15. Golipour, A. et al. A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. Cell Stem Cell 11, 769-782 (2012).
16. Samavarchi-Tehrani, P. et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 7, 64-77 (2010).
17. Polo, J. M. et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151, 1617-1632 (2012).
18. Woltjen, K. et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458, 766-770 (2009).
19. Soncin, F. et al. Abrogation of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact in mouse embryonic stem cells results in reversible LIF-independent self-renewal. Stem Cells 27, 2069-2080 (2009).
20. Soncin, F. et al. E-cadherin acts as a regulator of transcripts associated with a wide range of cellular processes in mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 6, e21463 (2011).
21. Larue, L. et al. A role for cadherins in tissue formation. Development 122, 3185-3194 (1996).
22. Mü ller, F.-J. et al. Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines. Nature 455, 401-405 (2008).
23. Wernig, M. et al. A drug-inducible transgenic system for direct reprogramming of multiple somatic cell types. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 916-924 (2008).
24. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313-317 (2007).
25. Hussein, S. M. I. et al. Genome-wide characterization of the routes to induced pluripotency. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14046 (2014).
26. Benevento, M. et al. Proteome adaptation in cell reprogramming proceeds via distinct transcriptional networks. Nature Commun. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6613 (2014).
27. Lee, D. S. et al. An epigenomic roadmap to induced pluripotency reveals DNA methylation as a reprogramming modulator. Nature Commun. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6619 (2014).
28. Clancy, J. L. et al.Small RNA changes en route to distinct cellular states of induced pluripotency. Nature Commun. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6522 (2014).
29. Li, R. et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51-63 (2010).
30. Chan, E. M. et al. Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 1033-1037 (2009).
31. Belteki, G. et al. Conditional and inducible transgene expression in mice through the combinatorial use of Cre-mediated recombination and tetracycline induction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e51 (2005).
32. Nagy, A., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten, K. & Behringer, R. R. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual 3rd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2003).
33. Gertsenstein, M. et al. Efficient generation of germ line transmitting chimeras fromC57BL/6NEScellsby aggregationwithoutbred hostembryos.PLoSONE 5, e11260 (2010).
34. Hussein, S. M. et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471, 58-62 (2011).
35. Imamura, M. et al. Transcriptional repression and DNA hypermethylation of a small set ofES cellmarker genes in male germline stemcells.BMCDev. Biol. 6,34 (2006).
36. Han, D. W. et al. Epiblast stem cell subpopulations represent mouse embryos of distinct pregastrulation stages. Cell 143, 617-627 (2010).