Effect of Instructor feedback on skills retention after laparoscopic simulator training: Follow-up of a randomized trial

Journal of Surgical Education

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 53-60

  Bjerrum, Flemming ^a   Maagaard, Mathilde ^a   Led Sorensen, Jette ^a   Rifbjerg Larsen, Christian ^b   Ringsted, Charlotte ^c   Winkel, Per ^d   Ottesen, Bent ^a   Strandbygaard, Jeanett ^a  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

instructor feedback; laparoscopy; proficiency based training; retention; simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SALPINGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SIMULATOR TRAINING; LAPSIM VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATOR; MEDICAL STUDENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALPINGECTOMY; SIMULATOR; SKILL RETENTION; SURGICAL TRAINING; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SALPINGECTOMY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84920714412     PISSN: 19317204     EISSN: 18787452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. C.R. Larsen, J.L. Soerensen, and T.P. Grantcharov Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial Br Med J 338 2009 b1802
2. G. Ahlberg, L. Enochsson, and A.G. Gallagher Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies Am J Surg 193 2007 797 804
3. D. Stefanidis, S. Arora, and D.M. Parrack Research priorities in surgical simulation for the 21st century. Am J Surg 203 2012 49 53
4. C.-A.E. Moulton, A. Dubrowski, and H. Macrae Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial Ann Surg 244 2006 400 409
5. K.A. Ericsson Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains Acad Med 79 2004 S70 S81
6. A.G. Gallagher, E.M. Ritter, and H. Champion Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training Ann Surg 241 2005 364 372
7. D. Stefanidis, J.R. Korndorffer, B.T. Heniford, and D.J. Scott Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training Surgery 142 2007 202 206
8. E. Boyle, M. Al-Akash, and A.G. Gallagher Optimising surgical training: use of feedback to reduce errors during a simulated surgical procedure Postgrad Med J 87 2011 524 528
9. E. Boyle, D.A. O'Keeffe, and P.A. Naughton The importance of expert feedback during endovascular simulator training J Vasc Surg 54 2011 240 241
10. E.G.G. Verdaasdonk, L.P.S. Stassen, R.P.J. van Wijk, and J. Dankelman The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 21 2007 214 219
11. A.W. Salmoni, R.A. Schmidt, and C.B. Walter Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal Psychol Bull 95 1984 355 386
12. A. Dubrowski Performance vs. learning curves: what is motor learning and how is it measured? Surg Endosc 19 2005 1290
13. D. Stefanidis, J.R. Korndorffer, and R. Sierra Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training Surgery 138 2005 165 170
14. B. Zendejas, R. Brydges, S.J. Hamstra, and D.A. Cook State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review Ann Surg 257 2013 586 593
15. R. Hatala, D.A. Cook, B. Zendejas, S.J. Hamstra, and R. Brydges Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 19 2 2014 251 272
16. J. Strandbygaard, F. Bjerrum, and M. Maagaard Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial Ann Surg 257 2013 839 844
17. C.W. Snyder, M.J. Vandromme, S.L. Tyra, and M.T. Hawn Retention of colonoscopy skills after virtual reality simulator training by independent and proctored methods Am Surg 76 2010 743 746
18. C.R. Larsen, T. Grantcharov, and R. Aggarwal Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator Surg Endosc 20 2006 1460 1466
19. D.A. Edelman, M.A. Mattos, and D.L. Bouwman FLS skill retention (learning) in first year surgery residents J Surg Res 163 2010 24 28
20. D. Stefanidis, J.R. Korndorffer, and S. Markley Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention J Am Coll Surg 202 2006 599 603
21. A.O. Castellvi, L.A. Hollett, and A. Minhajuddin Maintaining proficiency after fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training: a 1-year analysis of skill retention for surgery residents Surgery 146 2009 387 393
22. M. Maagaard, J.L. Sorensen, and J. Oestergaard Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer Surg Endosc 25 2011 722 727
23. P. Sinha, N.J. Hogle, and D.L. Fowler Do the laparoscopic skills of trainees deteriorate over time? Surg Endosc 22 2008 2018 2025
24. E.M. Bonrath, M. Fritz, and S.T. Mees Laparoscopic simulation training: does timing impact the quality of skills acquisition? Surg Endosc 27 2013 888 894
25. K.W. van Dongen, E. Tournoij, and D.C. van der Zee Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21 2007 1413 1417
26. W. Arthur Jr, W. Bennett Jr, P.L. Stanush, and T.L. McNelly Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis Hum Perform 11 1998 57 101
27. C.M. Walsh, S.C. Ling, C.S. Wang, and H. Carnahan Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait Acad Med 84 2009 S54 S57
28. R.W. Barnes Surgical handicraft: teaching and learning surgical skills Am J Surg 153 1987 422 427
29. E.A. Fleishman, and J.F. Parker Factors in the retention and relearning of perceptual-motor skill J Exp Psychol 64 1962 215 226
30. D. Stefanidis, M.W. Scerbo, and P.N. Montero Simulator training to automaticity leads to improved skill transfer compared with traditional proficiency-based training: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 255 2012 30 37
31. M.T. White, and K. Welch Does gender predict performance of novices undergoing fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) training? Am J Surg 203 2012 397 400 [discussion 400]
32. T.P. Grantcharov, L. Bardram, P. Funch-Jensen, and J. Rosenberg Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy Surg Endosc 17 2003 1082 1085
33. E. Hiemstra, W. Kolkman, M.A.J. van de Put, and F.W. Jansen Retention of basic laparoscopic skills after a structured training program Gynecol Surg 6 2009 229 235
34. D. Stefanidis, C. Acker, and B.T. Heniford Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay Surg Innov 15 2008 69 73
35. M.E. Rosenthal, E.M. Ritter, and M.T. Goova Proficiency-based fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills training results in durable performance improvement and a uniform certification pass rate Surg Endosc 24 2010 2453 2457
36. E.M. Bonrath, B.K. Weber, and M. Fritz Laparoscopic simulation training: testing for skill acquisition and retention Surgery 152 2012 12 20