Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: A new DEA method

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 74, Issue 5-8, 2014, Pages 1141-1148

  Toloo, Mehdi ^a  

^a VSB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Best efficient unit; Data envelopment analysis; Full ranking method; Imprecise data; Supplier selection; Uncertainly

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

BEST EFFICIENT UNIT; FULL RANKING; IMPRECISE DATA; SUPPLIER SELECTION; UNCERTAINLY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84920709052     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6035-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adler N, Friedman L, Stern ZS (2002) Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur J Oper Res 140:249–265
2. Amin GR, Toloo M (2007) Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: an improved integrated model. Comput Ind Eng 52(2):71–77
3. Amin GR, Gattoufi S, Rezaee Seraji E (2011) A maximum discrimination DEA method for ranking association rules in data mining. Int J Comput Math 88(11):2233–2245.
4. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1294
5. Bardhan I, Bowlin WF, Cooper WW, Sueyoshi T (1996) Models for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part I: Additive models and MED measures. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 39:322–332
6. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
7. Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G (1999) IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manag Sci 45:597–607
8. Despotis DK, Smirlis YG (2002) Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur J Oper Res 140(1):24–36
9. Ertay T, Ruan D, Tuzkaya UR (2006) Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Inf Sci 176:237–262
10. Farzipoor Saen R (2007) Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Eur J Oper Res 183:741–747
11. Farzipoor Saen R (2011) Media selection in the presence of flexible factors and imprecise data. J Oper Res Soc 62:1695–1703
12. Golany B (1988) An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of data envelopment analysis to effectiveness analysis. J Oper Res Soc 39(8):725–734
13. Güneri AF, Ertay T, Yücel A (2011) An approach based on ANFIS input selection and modeling for supplier selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):14907–14917
14. Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24
15. Karsak EE, Ahiska SS (2005) Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection. Int J Prod Res 43(8):1537–1554
16. Kilincci O, Onal SA (2011) Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9656–9664
17. Kim SH, Park CG, Park KS (1999) An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Comput Oper Res 26:59–72
18. Lin CT, Chen CB, Ting YC (2011) An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1760–1765
19. Sevkli M, Koh SCL, Zaim S, Demirbag M, Tatoglu E (2007) An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. Int J Prod Res 45(9):1973–2003
20. Sinuany-Stern Z, Mehrez A, Barboy A (1994) Academic department efficiency via data envelopment analysis. Comput Oper Res 21(5):543–556
21. Sexton TR, Silkman RH, Hogan AJ (1986) Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In: Silkman RH (ed) Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 73–105
22. Talluri S, Baker RC (2002) A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. Eur J Oper Res 141:544–558
23. Toloo M (2012) On finding the most BCC-efficient DMU: a new integrated MIP-DEA model. Appl Math Model 36:5515–5520
24. Toloo M, Nalchigar S (2009) A new integrated DEA model for finding most BCC-efficient DMU. Appl Math Model 33:597–604
25. Toloo M, Sohrabi B, Nalchigar S (2009) A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA. Expert Syst Appl 36:8503–8508
26. Toloo M, Nalchigar S (2011) A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Expert Syst Appl 38:14726–14731
27. Toloo M, Nalchigar S (2011) On ranking discovered rules of data mining by data envelopment analysis: some models with wider applications. In: Funatsu K, Hasegawa K (Eds) New fundamental technologies in data mining. InTech publisher 425–446. (Online available at: http://www.intechweb.org/books/show/title/new-fundamental-technologies-in-datamining)
28. Toloo M (2014) An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA. Appl Math Model 38:3182–3192.
29. Toloo M, Ertay T (2014) The most cost efficient automotive vendor with price uncertainty: a new DEA approach. Meas 52:135–144.
30. Toloo M, Kresta A (2014) Finding the best asset financing alternative: a DEA-WEO approach. Meas. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.05.015
31. Toloo M (2014) The role of non-Archimedean epsilon in finding the most efficient unit: with an application of professional tennis players. Appl Math Modell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.010
32. Torgersen AM, Forsund FR, Kittelsen SAC (1996) Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J Prod Anal 7:379–398
33. Zhu J (2003) Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): a review and improvement with an application. Eur J Oper Res 144:513–529