A maximum discrimination DEA method for ranking association rules in data mining

International Journal of Computer Mathematics

Volumn 88, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2233-2245

  Amin, Gholam R ^a   Gattoufi, Said ^a   Rezaee Seraji, E ^b  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

association rule; data envelopment analysis; data mining; maximum discrimination; ranking

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960536169     PISSN: 00207160     EISSN: 10290265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207160.2010.543457     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami, Mining Association Between Sets of Items in Massive Database, International Proceedings of the ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 1993, pp. 207-216.
2. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant, Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Databases. Santiago, Chile, 1994, pp. 487-499.
3. G.R. Amin, Optimal solution of technology selection model: A computational efficient form, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 43(9-10) (2009), pp. 1046-1050.
4. G.R.Amin and E. Emrouznejad, Finding relevance search engines results:A minimax linear programming approach, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61(7) (2010), pp. 1144-1150.
5. M.S. Bazaraa, J.J. Jarvis, and H.D. Sherali, Linear Programming and Network Flows, 3rd ed., JohnWiley & Sons, NJ, 2005.
6. M.C. Chen, Ranking discovered rules from data mining with multiple criteria by data envelopment analysis, Expert Syst. Appl. 33 (2007), pp. 1110-1116.
7. D.H. Choi, B.S. Ahn, and S.H. Kim, Prioritization of association rules in data mining: Multiple criteria decision approach, Expert Syst. Appl. 29 (2005), pp. 867-878. (Pubitemid 41394457)
8. S. Gattoufi, M. Oral, A. Kumar, and A. Reisman, Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004), pp. 911-935.
9. L. Geng and H.J. Hamilton, Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey,ACM Comput. Surv. 38(3) (2006), pp. 1-32.
10. E.E. Karsak and S.S. Ahiska, Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection, Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(24) (2008), pp. 6933-6944.
11. B. Llamazares and T. Peña, Preference aggregation and DEA: An analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 197(2) (2009), pp. 714-721.
12. P.C. Pendharkar, A data envelopment analysis-based approach for data preprocessing, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(10) (2005), pp. 1379-1388. (Pubitemid 41560424)
13. F.E. Petry and L. Zhao, Data mining by attribute generalization with fuzzy hierarchies in fuzzy databases, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(15) (2009), pp. 2206-2223.
14. R. Ramanathan, Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process, Comput. Oper. Res. 33 (2006), pp. 1289-1307. (Pubitemid 41428292)
15. M. Toloo, B. Sohrabi, and S. Nalchigar, A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA, Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4) (2009), pp. 8503-8508.
16. Y.M.Wang and K.S. Chin, A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process, European J. Oper. Res. 195 (2009), pp. 239-250.
17. Y.M. Wang, J. Liu, and T.M.S. Elhag, An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment, Comput. Ind. Eng. 54 (2008), pp. 513-525. (Pubitemid 351199802)
18. G.I.Webb and S. Zhang, K-optimal rule discovery, Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 10(1) (2005), pp. 39-79. (Pubitemid 40357001)
19. S. Zhang, C. Tjortjis, X. Zeng, H. Qiao, I. Buchan, and J. Keane, Comparing data mining methods with logistic regression in childhood obesity prediction, Inf. Syst. Front. 11(4) (2009), pp. 449-460.