The most cost efficient automotive vendor with price uncertainty: A new DEA approach

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 135-144

  Toloo, Mehdi ^a   Ertay, Tijen ^b  

^a VSB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Automotive industry; Cost efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Price uncertainty; Vendor selection

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MANAGERS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTS; COST EFFICIENCY; COST-EFFICIENT; GLOBAL MARKET; PRICE UNCERTAINTY; SCORING METHODS; VENDOR SELECTION;

COSTS;

EID: 84898069526     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. G.R. Amin, and M. Toloo Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: an improved integrated model Comput. Indust. Eng. 52 2007 71 77
2. G.R. Amin, and M. Toloo A polynomial-time algorithm for finding ε in DEA models Comput. Oper. Res. 31 2004 803 805
3. A. Asosheh, S. Nalchigar, and M. Jamporazmey Information technology project evaluation: an integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach Expert Syst. Appl. 37 8 2010 5931 5938
4. M. Azadi, and R. Farzipoor Saen Developing a new chance-constrained DEA model for supplier selection in the presence of undesirable outputs Int. J. Oper. Res. 13 2012 44 66
5. M. Azadi, and R. Farzipoor Saen Developing a chance-constrained free replicability hull model for supplier selection Int. J. Logis. Syst. Manage. 12 4 2012 375 394
6. M. Azadi, R. Farzipoor Saen, and M. Tavana Supplier selection using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis with nondiscretionary factors and stochastic data Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 10 2 2012 167 196
7. A.S. Camanho, and R. Dyson Cost efficiency measurement: DEA application to bank branch assessment Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161 2005 432 446
8. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes Measuring the efficiency of decision making units Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 1978 429 464
9. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes Short communication; measuring the efficiency of decision making units Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 1979 339
10. A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper Programming with linear fractional functionals Naval Res. Logis. Q. 9 1962 67 88
11. W.W. Cooper, J. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180 2007 443 458
12. W.W. Cooper, L.M. Seiford, and K. Tone Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software second ed. 2007 Kluwer Academic Publishers USA
13. T. Ertay, and D. Ruan Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164 2005 800 810
14. T. Ertay, D. Ruan, and U.R. Tuzkaya Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems Inf. Sci. 176 2006 237 262
15. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell The Measurement of Efficiency of Production 1985 Kluwer Academic Publishers
16. M.J. Farrell The measurement of productive efficiency J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 120 Part III 1957 253 291
17. K.C. Land, C.A.K. Lovell, and S. Thore Change-constraint data envelopment analysis Manag. Decis. Econ. 14 1993 541 554
18. E. Momeni, and R. Farzipoor Saen Developing a new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis in the presence of stochastic data Int. J. Business Excellence 5 3 2012 169 194
19. C. Schaffnit, D. Rosen, and J.C. Paradi Best practice analysis of bank branches: an application of DEA in a large Canadian bank Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98 1997 269 289
20. S. Talluri, and R. Narasimhan Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146 2003 543 552
21. S. Talluri, R. Narasimhan, and A. Nair Vendor performance wIth supply risk: a chance - constrained DEA approach Int. J. Prod. Econ. 100 2006 212 222
22. W.M. Taylor, R.G. Thompson, R.M. Thrall, and P.S. Dharmapala DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of Mexican banks: a total income model Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98 1997 346 363
23. R.G. Thompson, P.S. Dharmapala, D.B. Humphrey, W.M. Taylor, and R.M. Thrall Computing DEA/AR efficiency and profit ratio measures with an illustrative bank application Ann. Oper. Res. 68 1996 303 327
24. M. Toloo On finding the most BCC-efficient DMU: a new integrated MIP-DEA model Appl. Math. Model. 36 2012 5515 5520
25. M. Toloo An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA Appl. Math. Model. 2014 < http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.028 >
26. M. Toloo, A. Masoumzadeh, and M. Barat Finding an initial basic feasible solution for DEA models with an application on bank industry Comput. Econ. 2014 10.1007/s10614-014-9423-1
27. M. Toloo The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: an extended MILP-DEA model Measurement 46 2013 3628 3634
28. M. Toloo, and S. Nalchigar A new integrated DEA model for finding most BCC-efficient DMU Appl. Math. Model. 33 2009 597 604
29. M. Toloo, S. Nalchigar, On ranking discovered rules of data mining by data envelopment analysis: some models with wider applications. Chapter 23 of new fundamental technologies in data mining. InTech publisher, 2011. < http://www.intechweb.org/books/show/title/new-fundamental-technologies-in-data- mining >.
30. M. Toloo, and S. Nalchigar A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data Expert Syst. Appl. 38 2011 14726 14731
31. M. Toloo, B. Sohrabi, and S. Nalchigar A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA Expert Syst. Appl. 36 2009 8503 8508
32. C.A. Weber, J.R. Current, and W.C. Benton Vendor selection criteria and methods Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50 1991 2 18
33. D.D. Wu A systematic stochastic efficiency analysis model and application to international supplier performance evaluation Expert Syst. Appl. 37 2010 6257 6264
34. D. Wu, and D.L. Olson A Comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation Int. J. Prod. Res. 46 8 2008 2313 2327