Foxes, hedgehogs, and mirror effects: The role of general principles in memory research

The Foundations of Remembering: Essays in Honor Of Henry L. Roediger, III

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 53-66

  Greene, Robert L ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920691210     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837672     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of prepositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451–474.
2. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.
4. Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s theory of history. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5. Bugelski, B. R. (1962). Presentation time, total time, and mediation is paired associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 409–412.
6. Burns, D. J. (1989). Proactive interference: An individual item versus relational processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 345–359.
7. Chalmers, K. A., & Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 610–632.
8. Cooper, E. H., & Pantle, A. J. (1967). The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 221–234.
9. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
10. Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Crowder, R. G. (2003). McGeoch, John A. (1897–1942). In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 362–364). New York: Macmillan.
12. Dobbins, I. G., Kroll, N. E. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Liu, Q. (1998). Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: The role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 381–400.
13. Ebbinghaus, H. E. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
14. Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not for words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159–171.
15. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interactions between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 701–711.
16. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–65.
17. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 13, 8–20.
18. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546–567.
19. Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: The role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 687–695.
20. Greene, R. L. (1999). The role of familiarity in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 309–312.
21. Greene, R. L. (2003a). Distributed practice effects. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory (2nd ed., pp. 115–118). New York: Macmillan.
22. Greene, R. L. (2003b). Recognition memory for pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 259–267.
23. Greene, R. L., & Klein, A. A. (2004). Does recognition of single words predict recognition of two? American Journal of Psychology, 117, 215–227.
24. Greene, R. L., & Thapar, A. (1994). Mirror effect in frequency discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 946–952.
25. Greene, R. L., & Tussing, A. A. (2001). Similarity and associative recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 573–584.
26. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1105–1120.
27. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multipletrace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528–551.
28. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228–247.
29. Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 713–722.
30. Joordens, S., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1534–1555.
31. Maddox, W. T., & Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 539–559.
32. Mandler, G. (1979). Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University’s 500th anniversary (pp. 293–327). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1999). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A Bayesian approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724–760.
34. McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green.
35. Melton, A. W. (1967). Repetition and retrieval from memory. Science, 158, 532.
36. Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., & Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1095–1110.
37. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
38. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609–626.
39. Murdock, B. B. (2003). The mirror effect and the spacing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 570–588.
40. Ortony, A., Turner, T. J., & Antos, S. J. (1983). A puzzle about affect and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 725–729.
41. Payne, D. G. (1986). Hypermnesia for pictures and words: Testing the recall level hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 16–29.
42. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2000). Memory models. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 571–581). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember–know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294–320.
44. Roediger, H. L. (1993). Learning and memory: Progress and challenges. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 509–528). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Roediger, H. L., Payne, D. G., Gillespie, G. L., & Lean, D. S. (1982). Hypermnesia as determined by level of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 635–655.
46. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM: Remembering effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145–160.
47. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequencybased mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379–1396.
48. Thapar, A. (1996). Reverse-interference effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 430–437.
49. Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.
50. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? The American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.
51. Tulving, E., & Kroll, N. (1995). Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 387–390.
52. Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 31–41.
53. Underwood, B. J. (1961). Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice. Psychological Review, 68, 229–247.
54. Verde, M. F., & Rotello C. M. (2004). ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 560–566.
55. Watkins, M. J., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1012–1020.
56. Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Build-up of proactive interference as a cueoverload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442–452.
57. Westerman, D. L., & Greene, R. L. (1996). On the generality of the revelation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1147–1153.
58. Westerman, D. L., & Greene, R. L. (1998). The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 377–386.
59. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547–565.
60. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis for feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3–13.
61. Wickens, D. D., Born, D. G., & Allen, C. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440–445.
62. Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 681–690.