ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 560-566

  Verde, Michael F ^a   Rotello, Caren M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544298284     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196611     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BORNSTEIN, B. H., & NEELY, C. B. (2001). The revelation effect in frequency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 29, 209-213.
2. CAMERON, T. E., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (2000). The revelation effect for item and associative recognition: Familiarity versus recollection. Memory & Cognition, 28, 176-183.
3. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1105-1120.
4. HIRSHMAN, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 302-313.
5. HOCKLEY, W. E., & NIEWIADOMSKI, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1176-1184.
6. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
7. LECOMPTE, D. C. (1995). Recollective experience in the revelation effect: Separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 23, 324-334.
8. LUO, C. R. (1993). Enhanced feeling of recognition: Effects of identifying and manipulating test items on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 405-413.
9. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1996). Triangles in ROC space: History and theory of "nonparametric" measures of sensitivity and response bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 164-170.
11. NIEWIADOMSKI, M. W., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of familiarity-based accounts of the revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1130-1138.
12. RATCLIFF, R., SHEU, C. F., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
13. ROTELLO, C. M., & HEIT, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
14. VERDE, M. F., & ROTELLO, C. M. (2003). Does familiarity change in the revelation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 739-746.
15. WATKINS, M. J., & PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F. (1990). The revelation effect: When disguising test items induces recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 1012-1020.
16. WESTERMAN, D. L. (2000). Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory. Memory & Cognition, 28, 167-175.
17. WESTERMAN, D. L., & GREENE, R. L. (1996). On the generality of the revelation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1147-1153.
18. WESTERMAN, D. L., & GREENE, R. L. (1998). The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 377-386.
19. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3-13.
20. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.