Modulation of executive control in dual tasks with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 68, Issue , 2015, Pages 8-20

  Strobach, Tilo ^a   Soutschek, Alexander ^a   Antonenko, Daria ^b   Flöel, Agnes ^b   Schubert, Torsten ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dual tasks; Executive control; TDCS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DUAL TASK; DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE (TEST); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920647387     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Andrews S.C., Hoy K.E., Enticott P.G., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul. 2011, 4(2):84-89.
2. Beeli G., Casutt G., Baumgartner T., Jäncke L. Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain. Behav. Brain Funct. 2008, 4.
3. Bienenstock E.L., Cooper L.N., Munro P.W. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 1982, 2(1):32-48.
4. Borger R. The refractory period and serial choice-reactions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1963, 15(1):1-12.
5. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12(9):908-914.
6. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. Selection for cognitive control: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(40):8847-8852.
7. D'Esposito M., Detre J.A., Alsop D.C., Shin R.K. The neutral basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature 1995, 378(6554):279-281.
8. de Jong R. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A: Hum. Exp. Psychol. 1995, 48A(1):2-25.
9. Douglas R.J., Martin K.A.C. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:419-451.
10. Dux P.E., Ivanoff J.G., Asplund C.L., Marois R. Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron 2006, 52:1109-1120.
11. Dux P.E., Tombu M.N., Harrison S., Rogers B.P., Tong F., Marois R. Training improves multitasking performance by increasing the speed of information processing in human prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2009, 63:127-138.
12. Erickson K.I., Colcombe S.J., Wadhwa R., Bherer L., Peterson M.S., Scalf P.E., et al. Training-induced functional activation changes in dual-task processing: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(1):192-204.
13. Filmer H.L., Mattingley J.B., Dux P.E. Improved multitasking following prefrontal tDCS. Cortex 2013, 49:2845-2852.
14. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41:1149-1160.
15. Flöel A. Non-invasive brain stimulation and language processing in the healthy brain. Aphasiology 2012, 26(9):1082-1102.
16. Flöel A. tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 2014, 85(3):934-947.
17. Flöel A., Suttorp W., Kohl O., Kürten J., Lohmann H., Breitenstein C., et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33(8):1682-1689.
18. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Nitsche M., Bermpohl F., Antal A., Feredoes E., et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166:23-30.
19. Gandiga P.C., Hummel F.C., Cohen L.G. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117(4):845-850.
20. Hein G., Schubert T. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations. Psychol. Aging 2004, 19(3):416-432.
21. Hesselmann G., Flandin G., Dehaene S. Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study. Neuroimage 2011, 56(3):1608-1621.
22. Holland R., Leff A.P., Josephs O., Galea J.M., Desikan M., Price C.J., et al. Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21(16):1403-1407.
23. Ivanoff J., Branning P., Marois R. Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(12):4167-4186.
24. Jacobson L., Javitt D.C., Lavidor M. Activation of inhibition: diminishing impulsive behavior by direct current stimulation over the inferior frontal gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(11):3380-3387.
25. Jacobson L., Koslowsky M., Lavidor M. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 216(1):1-10.
26. Jiang Y., Kanwisher N. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(8):1080-1094.
27. Kamienkowski J.E., Pashler H., Dehaene S., Sigman M. Effects of practice on task architecture: combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making. Cognition 2011, 119(1):81-95.
28. Koechlin E., Basso G., Pietrini P., Panzer S., Grafman J. The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 1999, 399(6732):148-151.
29. Kramer A.F., Larish J.F., Strayer D.L. Training for attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and old adults. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 1995, 1(1):50-76.
30. Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43(3):192-199.
31. Kuo M.F., Unger M., Liebetanz D., Lang N., Tergau F., Paulus W., et al. Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(8):2122-2128.
32. Lang N., Siebner H.R., Ernst D., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W., Lemon R.N., et al. Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 56(9):634-639.
33. Lien M.-C., Schweickert R., Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2003, 29(3):692-712.
34. Liepelt R., Strobach T., Frensch P., Schubert T. Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 64(7):1251-1272.
35. Logothetis N.K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008, 453(7197):869-878.
36. Luria R., Meiran N. Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2003, 29(3):556-574.
37. Maquestiaux F., Hartley A.A., Bertsch J. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?. Psychol. Aging 2004, 19(4):649-667.
38. Meinzer M., Antonenko D., Lindenberg R., Hetzer S., Ulm L., Avirame K., et al. Electrical brain stimulation improves cognitive performance by modulating functional connectivity and task-specific activation. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(5):1859-1866.
39. Meinzer M., Lindenberg R., Antonenko D., Flaisch T., Flöel A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation temporarily reverses age-associated cognitive decline and functional brain activity changes. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(30):12470-12478.
40. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychol. Rev. 1997, 104(4):749-791.
41. Miller J., Ulrich R. Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 61(7):999-1019.
42. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 2000, 114(4):600-604.
43. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation-update 2011. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2011, 29(6):463-492.
44. Nitsche M.A., Roth A., Kuo M.-F., Fischer A.K., Liebetanz D., Lang N., et al. Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity in general network excitability in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(14):3807-3812.
45. Nitsche M.A., Schauenburg A., Lang N., Liebetanz D., Exner C., Paulus W., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(4):619-626.
46. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
47. Oswald W.D., Hagen B., Brickenkamp R. Testrezension zu Test d2- Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test. Z. Differ. Diagn. Psychol. 1997, 18(1-2):87-89.
48. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 1994, 116(2):220-244.
49. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A: Hum. Exp. Psychol. 1989, 41(1-A):19-45.
50. Raz N. Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: integration of structural and functional findings. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition 2000, 1-90. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US. 2nd ed.,. F. Craik, M. Salthouse, A. Timothy (Eds.).
51. Ruthruff E., Van Selst M., Johnston J.C., Remington R. How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?. Psychol. Res. 2006, 70(2):125-142.
52. Schmeichel B.J. Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 2007, 136(2):241-255.
53. Schubert T. Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25(2):408-425.
54. Schubert T., Szameitat A.J. Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17(3):733-746.
55. Schumacher E.H., Seymour T.L., Glass J.M., Fencsik D.E., Lauber E.J., Kieras D.E., et al. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 12(2):101-108.
56. Siebner H.R., Lang N., Rizzo V., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W., Lemon R.N., et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(13):3379-3385.
57. Sigman M., Dehaene S. Dynamics of the central bottleneck: dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e220.
58. Sparing R., Dafotakis M., Meister I.G., Thirugnanasambandam N., Fink G.R. Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation-a transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(1):261-268.
59. Stagg C.J., Jayaram G., Pastor D., Kincses Z.T., Matthews P.M., Johansen-Berg H. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):800-804.
60. Stagg C.J., Lin R.L., Mezue M., Segerdahl A., Kong Y., Xie J., et al. Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(28):11425-11431.
61. Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011, 17(1):37-53.
62. Stelzel C., Brandt S.A., Schubert T. Neural mechanisms of concurrent stimulus processing in dual tasks. Neuroimage 2009, 48(1):237-248.
63. Stelzel C., Kraft A., Brandt S.A., Schubert T. Dissociable neural effects on task order control and task set maintenance during dual-task processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(4):613-628.
64. Stone D.B., Tesche C.D. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention. NeuroReport: Rapid Commun. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 20(12):1115-1119.
65. Strobach, T., Frensch, P.A., Schubert, T., 2008. The temporal stability of skilled dual-task performance. In: Zimmer,H.D., Frings, C., Mecklinger, A., Opitz, B., Pospeschill, M., Wentura,D. (Eds.), Cognitive Science 2007. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Germany. Saarbrücken.
66. Strobach T., Frensch P.A., Müller H.J., Schubert T. Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions of dual-task performance. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2012, 19(1-2):222-247.
67. Strobach T., Frensch P.A., Müller H.J., Schubert T. Testing the limits of optimizing dual-task performance in younger and older adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6.
68. Strobach T., Frensch P.A., Schubert T. Video game practice optimizes executive control skills in dual-task and task switching situations. Acta Psychol. 2012, 140(1):13-24.
69. Strobach T., Frensch P.A., Soutschek A., Schubert T. Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills. Psychol. Res. 2012, 76(6):794-811.
70. Strobach T., Liepelt R., Schubert T., Kiesel A. Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Psychol. Res. 2012, 76(1):74-83.
71. Strobach T., Liepelt R., Pashler H., Frensch P.A., Schubert T. Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 75(5):900-920.
72. Strobach T., Salminen T., Karbach J., Schubert T. Practice-related optimization and transfer of executive functions: a general review and a specific realization of their mechanisms in dual tasks. Psychol. Res. 2014, 76(8):836-851.
73. Szameitat A.J., Lepsien J., von Cramon D.Y., Sterr A., Schubert T. Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: an event-related fMRI study. Psychol. Res. 2006, 70(6):541-552.
74. Szameitat A.J., Schubert T., Müller H.J. How to test for dual-task-specific effects in brain imaging studies? An evaluation of potential analysis methods. Neuroimage 2011, 54(3):1765-1773.
75. Szameitat A.J., Schubert T., Müller K., von Cramon D.Y. Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14(8):1184-1199.
76. Töllner T., Strobach T., Schubert T., Müller H.J. The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: just a central capacity limitation?. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2012, 6:75.
77. Tombu M., Jolicœur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2003, 29(1):3-18.
78. Ulrich R., Miller J. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects. Cogn. Psychol. 2008, 57(2):75-121.
79. Utz K.S., Dimova V., Oppenländer K., Kerkhoff G. Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology. A review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(10):2789-2810.
80. Van Selst M., Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25(5):1268-1283.
81. Verhaeghen P. Aging and executive control: reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 20(3):174-180.
82. West R.L. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol. Bull. 1996, 120(2):272-292.