From subjectification to intersubjectification

Motives for Language Change

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 124-140

  Traugott, Elizabeth Closs ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927013138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Aijmer, Karin. 1986. ‘Why is actually so popular in spoken English?’, in Gunnel Tottie and Ingegard B¨acklund (eds.), English in speech and writing: a symposium. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell, 119–29.
2. Akatsuka, Noriko. 1997. ‘Negative conditionality, subjectification, and conditional reasoning’, in Angeliki Athenasiadou and Ren´e Dirven (eds.), On conditionals again. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 323–54.
3. Benveniste, Emile. 1971 [1958]. ‘Subjectivity in language’, in Problems in general linguistics, trans. Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables: FL: University of Miami Press, 223–30
4. Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Blank, Andreas and Peter Koch (eds.). 1999. Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Breal, Michel. 1964 [1900]. Semantics: studies in the science of meaning, trans. Mrs Henry Cust. New York: Dover.
7. Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Brinton, Laurel J. 1998. “The flowers are lovely; only, they have no scent’: the evolution of a pragmatic marker’, in Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker
9. Historical pragmatics: Anglistentag 1997 Gießen Proceedings. Gießen: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 9–33.
10. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
11. Buhler, Karl. 1990 [1934]. Theory of language: the representational function of language, trans. Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: Benjamins
12. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
13. Carey, Kathleen. 1995. ‘Subjectification and the English perfect’, in Stein and Wright (eds.), 83–102.
14. Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson. 1982. ‘Hearers and speech acts’, Language 58: 332–73.
15. Dasher, Richard. 1995. ‘Grammaticalization in the System of Japanese Predicate Honorifics’, PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
16. Deutscher, Guy. 1999. ‘The different faces of uniformitarianism’, paper given at the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver.
17. Fillmore, Charles J. 1997 [1971]. Lectures on deixis. Stanford University: CSLI Publications.
18. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. ‘How does a language acquire gender markers?’, in Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson and Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 249–95.
19. Hanson, Kristin. 1987. ‘On subjectivity and the history of epistemic expressions in English’, in Barbara Need, Eric Schiller and Anna Bosch (eds.), Papers from the 23rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 133–47.
20. Held, Gudrun. 1999. ‘Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations’, Pragmatics 9: 21–36.
21. Hopper, Paul J. 1991. ‘On some principles of grammaticization’, in Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: 37–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
23. Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Russian Language Project.
25. Joseph, Brian D. and Richard D. Janda. 1988. ‘The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization’, in M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology: approaches in modern linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 193–210.
26. Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. ‘The discourse marker well in the history of English’, English Language and Linguistics 1: 91–110.
27. Konig, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: a comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
28. Kuroda, S.-Y. 1973. ‘Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet: a case study from Japanese’, in Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 377–91.
29. Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. ‘Observations and speculations on subjectivity’, in John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–50.
30. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. ‘Subjectification’, Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38.
31. Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. ‘Raising and transparency’, Language 71: 1–62.
32. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. ‘Losing control: grammaticalization, subjectification, and transparency’, in Blank and Koch (eds.), 147–75.
33. Lass, Roger. 2000. ‘Remarks on (uni)directionality’, in Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 207–27.
34. Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization, Munich: Lincom Europa originally published as Thoughts on grammaticalization, a programmatic sketch, vol. 1. Arbeiten des K¨olner Universalien-Projekts 48. Cologne: University of Cologne, Institut f¨ur Sprachwissenschaft, 1982.
35. Lewin, Bruno (ed.). 1969. Beitr¨age zum interpersonalen Bezug im Japanischen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
36. Lyons, John. 1982. ‘Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum?’, in Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: studies in deixis and related topics. New York: Wiley, 101–24.
37. Lyons, John. 1994. ‘Subjecthood and subjectivity’, in Marina Yaguello (ed.), Subjecthood and subjectivity: the status of the subject in linguistic theory. Paris: Ophrys, 9–17.
38. Matsuo, Hajime. 1961. Taketori monogatari zensyaku [Completely annotated edition of the Taketori Monogatari (mid Tenth Century)]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.
39. Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse modality: subjectivity, emotion, and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Nevalainen, Terttu. 1991. BUT, ONLY, JUST: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Helsinki: Soci´et´e N´eophilologique.
41. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
42. Nordlinger, Rachel and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1997. ‘Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to’, English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317.
43. Nuyts, Jan. 1998. ‘Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions’, paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Pragmatics, Reims.
44. Onodera, Noriko O. 2000. ‘Development of demo type connectives and na elements: two extremes of Japanese discourse markers’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 27–55.
45. Powell, Mava Jo. 1992. ‘The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs’, Cognitive Linguistics 3: 75–110.
46. Reddy, Michael J. 1993 [1979]. ‘The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language’, in Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 164–201.
47. Rissanen, Matti. 1967. The uses of one in Old and Early Middle English. Helsinki: Soci´et´e N´eophilologique.
48. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
49. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. ‘The principle of intersubjectivity in communication and conversation’, Semiotica 80: 121–51.
50. Schwenter, Scott and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2000. ‘Invoking scalarity: the development of in fact’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 7–25.
51. Stein, Dieter and Susan Wright (eds.). 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language. Cambridge University Press.
52. Suzuki, Ryoko. 1998. ‘From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particle: wake,’ in Toshio Ohori (ed.), Studies in Japanese grammaticalization. Tokyo:Kurosio Publishers, 67–92.
53. Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence adverbials in English: a synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.
54. Sweetser, Eve V. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.
55. Tagaki, Ichinosuke, Tomohide Gomi and Susumu Ohno (eds. and annot.). 1957-60. Man’yoosyuu Man’yoshu, The Ten-Thousand Leaves (before 760 AC), 4 vols. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
56. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. ‘On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change’, Language 57: 33–65.
57. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. ‘Subjectification in grammaticalization’, in Stein and Wright (eds.), 31–54.
58. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. ‘Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: the case of promise and threaten’, in Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 185–210.
59. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999a. ‘The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: a study in subjectification’, in Blank and Koch (eds.), 177–96.
60. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999b. ‘The role of pragmatics in semantic change’, in Jef
61. Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, 93–102.
62. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.
63. Tsujimura, Toshiki. 1968. Keigo no Si-teki Kenkyuu Historical Studies of Japanese Honorifics. Tokyo: Tokyodo.
64. Yokomichi, Mario and Akira Omote (eds. and annot.). 1960. Yookyoku-syuu Selected Noh Plays. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei, series, vol. 40. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.