Summing up program theory

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2000, Issue 87, 2000, Pages 103-112

  Bickman, Leonard ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920595937     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1186     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bickman, L., (ed.).Using Program Theory in Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
2. Bickman, L., (ed.).Advances in Program Theory.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
3. Bickman, L., “The Application of Program Theory to the Evaluation of a Managed Mental Health Care System.“Evaluation and Program Planning, 1996, 19(2), 111-119.
4. Bickman, L., “Resolving Issues Raised by the Fort Bragg Evaluation: New Directions for Mental Health Services Research.“American Psychologist, 1997, 52(5), 562-565.
5. Bickman, L., Noser, K., and Summerfelt, W. T., “Long-Term Effects of a System of Care on Children and Adolescents.“Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research, 1999, 26(2), 185-202.
6. Friedman, R. M., “The Fort Bragg Study: What Can We Conclude?“Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1996, 5(2), 161-168.
7. Hedrick, T. E., Bickman, L., and Rog, D. J., Applied Research Design: A Practical Guide.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
8. Rog, D. J., “A Methodological Analysis of Evaluability Assessment.“Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1985.
9. Schorr, L. B., Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America.New York: Anchor Books, 1997.
10. Suchman, E. A., Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.
11. Wholey, J. S., “Evaluability Assessment: Developing Program Theory.“In L. Rickman., (ed.), Using Program Theory in Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.