Long-term effects of a system of care on children and adolescents

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 185-202

  Bickman, Leonard ^a   Noser, Kelly ^b   Summerfelt, Wm Thomas ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD CARE; CHILD WELFARE; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICES; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; OHIO; STATISTICS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033067685     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02287490     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Behar L: An integrated state system of services for seriously disturbed children. In: Looney JG (Ed.): In Chronic Mental Illness in Children and Adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1988, pp. 131-158.
2. Stroul BA, Friedman RM: A System of Care for Severely Emotionally Disturbed Youth. Washington, DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center, 1986.
3. Saxe L, Cross T, Silverman N, et al.: Children's Mental Health: Problems and Treatment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987.
4. Friedman RM, Duchnowski AJ: Children's mental health services [Special issue]. Journal of Mental Health Administration 1990; 17(1).
5. Behar L: The Fort Bragg Evaluation: A snapshot in time. American Psychologist 1997; 52:557-559.
6. Stroul BA: Children's mental health: Creating Systems of Care in a Changing Society. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 1996.
7. Bickman L, Summerfelt WT, Noser K: Comparative outcomes of emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in a system of services and usual care. Psychiatric Services 1997; 48:1543-1548.
8. Bickman L: A continuum of care: More is not always better. American Psychologist 1996; 51:689-701.
9. Bickman L, Guthrie P, Foster EM, et al.: Evaluating Managed Mental Health Services: The Fort Bragg Experiment. New York: Plenum, 1995.
10. Bickman L: Resolving issues raised by the Fort Bragg evaluation: New directions for mental health services. American Psychologist 1997; 52:562-565.
11. Bickman L, Heflinger CA, Lambert EW, et al.: The Fort Bragg managed care experiment: Short term impact on psychopathology. Journal of Child and Family Studies 1996; 5:137-160.
12. Bickman L, Summerfelt WT, Foster EM: Research on systems of care: Implications of the Fort Bragg Evaluation, in children's mental health. In: Stroul BA (Ed.): Creating Systems of Care in a Changing Society. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1996, pp. 337-355.
13. Friedman RM, Burns BJ: The evaluation of the Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: An alternative interpretation of the findings. Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23:128-136.
14. Burchard JD: Evaluation of the Fort Bragg managed care experiment. Journal of Child and Family Studies 1996; 5:173-176.
15. Sechrest L, Walsh M: Dogma or data: Bragging rights. American Psychologist 1997; 52:536-540.
16. Weisz JR, Han SS, Valeri, SM: More of what? Issues raised by the Fort Bragg study. American Psychologist 1997; 52:541-545.
17. Hoagwood K: Interpreting nullity: The Fort Bragg experiment - A comparative success or failure? American Psychologist 1997; 52:546-550.
18. DeLeon PH, Williams JG: Evaluation research and public policy formation: Are psychologists collectively willing to accept unpopular findings? American Psychologist 1997; 52:551-552.
19. Henggeler SW, Schoenwald SK, Munger, RL: Families and therapists achieve clinical outcomes, systems of care mediate the process. Journal of Child and Family Studies 1996; 5:177-183.
20. Weisz JR, Han SS, Valeri SM: What can we learn from Fort Bragg? Journal of Child and Family Studies 1996; 5:185-190.
21. The National Comprehensive Community Mental Health for Child and Families Program Evaluation: Report from Year One, Stark County, OH. Atlanta, GA: Macro International, 1996.
22. Community-Based Mental Health Services for Children in the Child Welfare System. Final Report Contract No. HHS-100-91 -0016-01. Atlanta, GA: Macro International, 1992.
23. Stroul BA, Goldman SK, Lourie IS, et al.: Profiles of Local Systems of Care for Children and Adolescents with Severe Emotional Disturbances. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: CASSP Technical Assistance Center, 1992.
24. Bickman L: Reinterpreting the Fort Bragg Evaluation findings: The message does not change. Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23:137-145.
25. Bickman L, Summerfelt WT, Firth JM, et al.: The Stark County Evaluation Project: Baseline results of a randomized experiment. In Nixon CT, Northrup DA (Eds.): Evaluating Mental Health Services: How Do Programs "Work" in the Real World? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997, pp. 231-258.
26. Hodges K, Kline J, Stem L, et al.: The development of a child assessment interview for research and clinical use. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1982; 10:173-189.
27. Summerfelt WT, Hodges, VK: Test-Retest Reliability of an Interactive Computerized Interview with Adolescents: The Computerized Child Assessment Schedule. Poster presented at the 5th annual research conference on a System of Care for Children's Mental Health Expanding the Research Base, Tampa, FL, March 2-4, 1992.
28. Hodges, K: Structured interviews for assessing children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 1993; 34:49-68.
29. Achenbach TM: Manual for the Child and Behavior Checklist and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
30. Achenbach TM: Manual for the Teacher Report Form and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
31. Bickman L, Lambert EW, Karver M, et al.: Two low-cost measures of child and adolescent functioning for services research. Evaluation & Program Planning 1998; 21:263-275.
32. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS: The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1983; 9:171-180.
33. Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, et al.: The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1985; 11:345-356.
34. Harter S: Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver Press, 1985.
35. Bickman L, Earl E, Klindworth L: Vanderbilt Mental Health Service Efficacy Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 1991.
36. Kelker KA: Working together: The parent-professional partnership. Families as Allies Project Research and Training Center to Improve Services for Seriously Emotionally Handicapped Children and Their Families, Portland, OR, April 1987.
37. Dunst CJ, Leet HE: Measuring the adequacy of resources in households with young children. Child: Care Health and Development 1987; 13:111-125.
38. Achenbach TM: Manual for the Youth Self Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
39. Brannan AM, Heflinger CA, Bickman L: The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire: Measuring the impact of living with a child with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 1997; 5:212-222.
40. Gibbons, RD, Hedeker DR, Davis JM: Estimation of effect size from a series of experiments involving paired comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics 1993; 18:271-279.
41. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW: Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin 1987; 101:147-158.
42. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD, Flay BR: Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 1994; 62:757-765.
43. Rogosa D: Myths about longitudinal research. In Schaie W (Ed.): Methodological Issues in Aging Research. New York: Springer, 1988, pp. 171-209.
44. Rogosa D, Brandt D, Zimowski M: A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 1982; 92:726-748.
45. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW: Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
46. Bryk A, Raudenbush S, Congdon R: HLM Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1996.
47. Raudenbush SW: Random effects models. In Cooper H (Ed.): The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage, 1994, pp. 301-321.
48. Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, et al.: SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1996.
49. Diggle PJ, Liang, KY, Zeger SC: Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1994.
50. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
51. Foster EM, Bickman L: An evaluator's guide to detecting attrition problems. Evaluation Review 1996; 20:695-723.
52. Verbeek M, Nijman T: Testing for selectivity bias in panel data models. International Economic Review 1992; 33:681-703.
53. Service Activity Log and Manual. Canton, OH: Child and Adolescent Center, March 1997.
54. Friedman RM, Street S: Admission and discharge criteria for children's mental health services: A review of the issues and options. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1985; 14:229-235.
55. Bickman L, Karver MS, Schut LJA: Clinician reliability and accuracy in judging appropriate level of care. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 1997; 65:515-520.
56. Weisz JR, Doneberg GR, Han SS, et al.: Bridging the gap between lab and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995; 63:688-701.
57. Rivera VR, Kutash K: What Works in Children's Mental Health Services?: Uncovering Answers to Critical Questions. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 1996.
58. Bickman L, Noser K: Meeting the challenges in the delivery of child and adolescent mental health services in the next millennium: The continuous quality improvement approach. Applied and Preventive Psychology. In press.