Resolving Issues Raised by the Fort Bragg Evaluation: New Directions for Mental Health Services Research

American Psychologist

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 562-565

  Bickman, Leonard ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

DECISION MAKING; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; RESEARCH;

EID: 0031136205     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.562     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Behar, L. B. (1997). The Fort Bragg evaluation: A snapshot in time. American Psychologist, 52, 557-559.
2. Bickman, L. (1996a). A continuum of care: More is not always better. American Psychologist, 51, 689-701.
3. Bickman, L. (1996b). Reinterpreting the Fort Bragg evaluation findings: The message does not change. The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 137-145.
4. Bickman, L., Guthrie, P. R., Foster, E. M., Lambert, E. W., Summerfelt, W. T., Breda, C. S., & Heflinger, C. A. (1995). Evaluating managed mental health services: The Fort Bragg experiment. New York: Plenum Press.
5. Bickman, L., Karver, M., & Schut, L. J. A. (in press). Clinician reliability and accuracy in judging appropriate level of care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
6. Bickman, L., & Salzer, M. S. (in press). (Guest Eds.). Measuring quality in mental health services [Special issue]. Evaluation Review.
7. Bickman, L., Summerfelt, W. T., Firth, J., & Douglas, S. (in press). The Stark County Evaluation Project: Baseline results of a randomized experiment. In D. Northrup & C. Nixon (Eds.), Evaluating mental health services: How do programs for children work in the real world? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Bickman, L., Summerfelt, W., & Noser, K. (1996). Does a system of care improve clinical outcomes? Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. DeLeon, P. H., & Williams, J. G. (1997). Evaluation research and public policy formation: Are psychologists collectively willing to accept unpopular findings? American Psychologist, 52, 551-552.
10. Feldman, S. (1997). The Fort Bragg demonstration and evaluation. American Psychologist, 52, 560-561.
11. Hamner, K., Lambert, W., & Bickman, L. (1996). Clinical effects of Fort Bragg 18 months later. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Hoagwood, K. (1997). Problematizing nullity: The Fort Bragg experiment - A comparative success or failure? American Psychologist, 52, 546-550.
13. Hoagwood, K., & Bickman, L. (1996). Consortium child treatment effectiveness proposal. Unpublished proposal submitted to the National Institute of Mental Health and the Center for Mental Health Services.
14. Hoagwood, K., Hibbs, E., Brent, D., & Jensen, P. (1995). Introduction to the Special Section: Efficacy and effectiveness in studies of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 683-687.
15. Lambert, W., Nixon, C., Simpkins, G., & Bickman, L. (1996). Mental health outcomes for treated children: Definitions of improvement, effects of severity, and predicting clinical outcomes. Unpublished report submitted to the U.S. Army Surgeon General.
16. Salzer, M. S., & Bickman, L. (1997). Delivering effective children's services in the community: Reconsidering the benefits of system interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 1-13.
17. Saxe, L., & Cross, T. P. (1997). Interpreting the Fort Bragg Children's Mental Health Demonstration Project: The cup is half full. American Psychologist, 52, 553-556.
18. Weisz, J. R., Han, S. S., & Valeri, S. M. (1997). More of what? Issues raised by the Fort Bragg study. American Psychologist, 52, 541-545.
19. Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 295-314.