Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-16

  Mathie, Robert T ^a   Lloyd, Suzanne M ^b   Legg, Lynn A ^c   Clausen, Jürgen ^d   Moss, Sian ^e   Davidson, Jonathan R T ^f   Ford, Ian ^b  

^a BRITISH HOMEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^d Karl und Veronica Carstens Stiftung   (Germany)

^e Homeopathy Research Institute   (United Kingdom)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Individualised homeopathy; Meta analysis; Randomised controlled trials; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; PROCEDURES;

HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS; PRECISION MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84920577834     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Vithoulkas G: Another point of view for the homeopathic trials and meta-analyses. [http://www.vithoulkas.com/en/research/articles/2247.html]
2. Sense About Science: Homeopathy. [http://www.senseaboutscience.org/ data/files/resources/54/Homeopathy.pdf.]
3. Linde K, Scholz M, Ramirez G, Clausius N, Melchart D, Jonas WB: Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy. J Clin Epidemiol 1999, 52:631-636.
4. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P, ter Riet G: Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ 1991, 302:316-323.
5. Boissel JP, Cucherat M, Haugh M, Gauthier E: Critical literature review on the effectiveness of homoeopathy: overview of data from homoeopathic medicine trials. In Homoeopathic Medicine Research Group, Report of the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General XII-Science, Research and Development, Directorate E-RTD Actions. Brussels, Belgium: Life Sciences and Technologies-Medical Research; 1996.
6. Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB: Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997, 350:834-843.
7. Cucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP: Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000, 56:27-33.
8. Shang A, Huwiler-Muntener K, Nartey L, Juntherapiesi P, Dorig S, Sterne JA, Pewsner D, Egger M: Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005, 366:726-732.
9. Linde K, Melchart D: Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: a state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med 1998, 4:371-388.
10. Mathie RT, Legg LA, Clausen J, Davidson JRT, Lloyd SM, Ford I: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled, trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: study protocol. 2013, Version 1.0; January 2013. [http://www.britishhomeopathic.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/05/Study_protocol_for_systematic_review.pdf]
11. Mathie RT, Hacke D, Clausen J, Nicolai T, Riley DS, Fisher P: Randomised controlled trials of homeopathy in humans: characterising the research journal literature for systematic review. Homeopathy 2013, 102:3-24.
12. World Health Organization: Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
13. Higgins JPT, Altman DG: Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. Edited by Higgins JPT, Green S. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
14. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D: Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 5.1.0. Edited by Higgins JPT, Green S. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
15. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629-634.
16. Bellavite P, Marzotto M, Olioso D, Moratti E, Conforti A: High-dilution effects revisited. 1. Physicochemical aspects. Homeopathy 2014, 103:4-21.
17. El Dib RP, Atallah AN, Andriolo RB: Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13:689-692.
18. Leucht S, Hierl S, Kissling W, Dold M, Davis JM: Putting the efficacy of psychiatric and general medicine medication into perspective: review of meta-analyses. Br J Psychiatry 2012, 200:97-106.
19. Weatherley-Jones E, Thompson EA, Thomas KJ: The placebo-controlled trial as a test of complementary and alternative medicine: observations from research experience of individualised homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy 2004, 93:186-189.
20. Brien S, Lachance L, Prescott P, McDermott C, Lewith G: Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011, 50:1070-1082.
21. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP: Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998, 352:609-613.
22. Bell IR, Koithan M: A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012, 12:191.
23. Bellavite P, Marzotto M, Olioso D, Moratti E, Conforti A: High-dilution effects revisited. 2. Pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Homeopathy 2014, 103:22-43.
24. Mathie RT, Roniger H, Van Wassenhoven M, Frye J, Jacobs J, Oberbaum M, Bordet M-F, Nayak C, Chaufferin G, Ives JA, Dantas F, Fisher P: Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012, 12:49.
25. Jacobs J, Herman P, Heron K, Olsen S, Vaughters L: Homeopathy for menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med 2005, 11:21-27.
26. Jacobs J, Jimenez LM, Malthouse S, Chapman E, Crothers D, Masuk M, Jonas WB: Homeopathic treatment of acute childhood diarrhoea: results from a clinical trial in Nepal. J Altern Complement Med 2000, 6:131-139.
27. White A, Slade P, Hunt C, Hart A, Ernst E: Individualised homeopathy as an adjunct in the treatment of childhood asthma: a randomised placebo controlled trial. Thorax 2003, 58:317-321.
28. Steinsbekk A, Bentzen N, Fønnebø V, Lewith G: Self treatment with one of three self selected, ultramolecular homeopathic medicines for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections in children. A double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005, 59:447-455.
29. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Wider B, Boddy K: Homeopathy: is the evidence-base changing? Perfusion 2006, 19:380-382.
30. British Homeopathic Association: Data from randomised controlled trials of individualised homeopathy, reported by Shang et al. in 2005. [http://www.britishhomeopathic.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Shang-reanalysis- individualised.pdf]