Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 631-636

  Linde, Klaus ^a   Scholz, Michael ^b   Ramirez, Gilbert ^c   Clausius, Nicola ^a   Melchart, Dieter ^a   Jonas, Wayne B ^d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Homeopathy; Meta analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Study quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HOMEOPATHY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL TRIALS; HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PLACEBOS; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033012495     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00048-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., Hayes R.J., Altman D.G. Empirical evidence of bias. JAMA. 273:1995;408-412.
2. Khan K.S., Daya S., Jadad A.R. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Arch Intern Med. 156:1996;661-666.
3. Moher D., Pham B., Jones A., Cook D.J., Jadad A.R., Moher M.et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 352:1998;609-613.
4. Moher D., Jadad A.R., Nichol G., Penman M., Tugwell P., Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists Control Clin Trials. 16:1995;62-73.
5. Greenland S. Quality scores are useless and potentially misleading. Am J Epidemiol. 140:1994;300-301.
6. Olkin I. Invited commentary. Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods." Am J Epidemiol. 140:1994;297-299.
7. Linde K., Clausius N., Ramirez G., Melchart D., Eitel F., Hedges L.V.et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 350:1997;834-843.
8. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carrol D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds D.J.M., Lavaghan D.J.et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials. is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 17:1996;1-12.
9. Linde K., Worku F., Stör W., Wiesner-Zechweister M., Pothenceuu R., Weinschitz T. Randomized clinical trials of acupuncture for asthma - a systematic review. Fortschr Komplementärmed. 3:1996;148-155.
10. Linde K., Ramirez G., Mulrow C.D., Pauls A., Weidenhammer W., Melchart D. St John's wort for depression - an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 313:1996;253-258.
11. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 7:1986;177-188.
12. Berkey C.S., Hoaglin D.C., Mosteller F., Colditz G.A. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 14:1995;395-411.
13. Laird N.M., Ware J.R. Random-effects models of longitudinal data. Biometrics. 38:1982;963-974.
14. Walach H., Haeusler W., Lowes T., Mussbach D., Schawell U., Springer W. Classical homeopathic treatment of chronic headache. Cephalalgia. 17:1997;119-126.
15. Whitmarsh T.E., Coleston-Shields D.M., Steiner T.J. Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine. Cephalalgia. 17:1997;600-604.
16. Linde K., Melchart D. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy - a state-of-the-art review. J Alt Complement Med. 4:1998;371-388.
17. Chalmers T.C., Smith H., Blackburn B., Silverman B., Schroeder B., Reitman D. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 2:1981;31-39.
18. Emerson J.D., Burdick E., Hoaglin D.C., Mosteller F., Chalmers T.C. An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 11:1990;339-352.
19. Greenland S. Meta-analysis. Rothman K., Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 1998;Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, PA.
20. Moher D., Jadad A.R., Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care. 12:1996;195-208.
21. Nurmohamed M.T., Rosendaal F.R., Bueller H.R., Dekker E., Howmes D.W., Vandenbroucke J.P. Low-molecular weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopedic surgery. A meta-analysis Lancet. 340:1992;152-156.
22. Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin J. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized trials. The CONSORT statement JAMA. 276:1996;637-639.