Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel

Nursing Research

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 361-366

  Schilling, Lynne S ^a   Dixon, Jane K ^b   Knafl, Kathleen A ^c   Grey, Margaret ^f   Ives, Brett ^d   Lynn, Mary R ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Yale Children's Diabetes Program   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^f University of Massachusetts Worcester ^*

Author keywords

Adolescents; Content validity; Content validity expert; Measurement

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 34548573091     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289505.30037.91     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andre, M., Hdengren, E., Hagelberg, S., & Stenstrom, C. (1999). Perceived ability to manage juvenile chronic arthritis among adolescents and parents: Development of a questionnaire to assess medical issues, exercise, pain and social support. Arthritis Care and Research, 12, 229-237.
2. Beck, C. T., & Gable, K. (2000). Postpartum depression screening scale: Development and psychometric testing. Nursing Research, 49, 272-282.
3. Bhatia, S., Jenney, M., Bogue, M., Rockwood, T., Feusner, J., Friedman, D., et al. (2002). The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument: Reliability and validity of the adolescent form. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 4692-4698.
4. Bova, C., Fennie, K. P., Watrous, E., Dieckhaus, K., & Williams, A. (2006). The health care relationship trust scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 477-488.
5. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 104-107.
6. Grant, J. S., & Davis, L L (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 269-274.
7. Hamburg, B. A. (1998). Psychosocial development. In S. B., Friedman, M., Fisher, S. K., Schonberg, & E. M., Alderman (Eds.), Comprehensive adolescent health care (2nd ed., pp. 38-49). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
8. Knafl, K., Deatrick, J., Gallo, A., Holcombe, G., Bakitas, J., Dixon, J., et al. (2007). The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 224-234.
9. Kopelman, L. M. (2004). Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(1), 50-52.
10. Kyngas, H. A., Skaar-Chandler, C. A., & Duffy, M. E. (2000). The development of an instrument to measure the compliance of adolescents with a chronic disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1499-1506.
11. Lewin, L., & Dale, J. (2003). Research considerations with children and adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 17, 268-270.
12. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.
13. Moens, A., Grypdonck, M. H., & van der Bijl, J. J. (2001). The development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure diabetes management self-efficacy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 15, 223-233.
14. Moss, J. (2005). Development of a functional ability scale for children and young people with myalgic encephalopathy (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Journal of Child Health Care, 9(1), 20-30.
15. Olds, R. S. (2003). Informed-consent issues with adolescent health behavior research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl. 3), S248-S263.
16. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic.
17. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
18. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 489-497.
19. Redline, S., Larkin, E., Kercsmar, C., Berger, M., & Siminoff, L. (2003). Development and validation of school-based asthma and allergy screening instruments for parents and students. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 90, 516-528.
20. Schilling, L. S., Grey, M., & Knafl, K. A. (2002). The concept of self-management of diabetes in children and adolescents: An evolutionary concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(1), 87-99.
21. Schilling, L. S., Knafl, K. A., & Grey, M. (2006). Changing patterns of self-management in youth with type 1 diabetes, Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 21, 412-424.
22. Selman, R., & Shultz, L. (1990). Making a friend in youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Slocumb, E. M., & Cole, F. L. (1991). A practical approach to content validation. Applied Nursing Research, 4(4), 192-200.
24. Stanton, W. R., Willis, M., & Balanda, K. (2000). Development of an instrument for monitoring adolescent health issues. Health Education Research, 15, 181-190.
25. Stewart, J. L., Lynn, M. L., & Mishel, M. H. (2005). Evaluating content validity for children's self-report instruments using children as content experts. Nursing Research, 54, 414-418.
26. Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
27. Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (1981). Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
28. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.