Agent-oriented modeling in simulation: Agents for modeling, and modeling for agents

Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 8-

  Uhrmacher, Adelinde M ^a   Röhl, Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920481100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Agre, P. and D. Chapman (1987). PENGI: An implementation of a theory of activity. In Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), Seattle, WA, pp. 268-272.
2. Axtell, R. (2000). Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper No. 17.
3. Balmer, M., K. Nagel, and B. Raney (2004). Large-scale multi-agent simulations for transportation applications. ITS Journal 8, 1-17.
4. Batty, M. (2005). Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. London: MIT Press.
5. Baumgaertel, H., S. Brueckner, V. Parunak, R. Vanderbok, and J. Wilke (2003). Agent models of supply network dynamics. In T. P. Harrison, H. L. Lee, and J. J. Neale (Eds.), The Practice of Supply Chain Management, International Series on Operations Research and Management Science. New York: Kluwer.
6. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without reason. In J. Myopoulos and R. Reiter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), Sydney, Australia, pp. 569-595. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, USA.
7. Bunge, M. (1979). Ontology II: A World of Systems, Volume 4 of Treatise of Basic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.
8. Casagni, M. and M. Lyell (2003). Comparison of two component frameworks: The fipa-compliant multi-agent system and the web-centre j2ee platform. In ICSE '03: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 341-351. IEEE Computer Society.
9. Chen, S., S. Ganguli, and C. A. Hunt (2004). An agent-based computational approach for representing aspects of in vitro multi-cellular tumor spheroid growth. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 691-694.
10. Clark, M., K. Irvig, and W. Wobcke (1997). Emergent properties of teams of agents in the Tileworld. In L. Cavedon, A. Rao, and W. Wobcke (Eds.), Intelligent Agent Systems, Volume 1209 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 164-176. Berlin: Springer.
11. Conte, R. and C. Castelfranchi (Eds.) (1995). Cognitive and Social Action. London: UCL Press.
12. Conte, R., B. Edmonds, S. Moss, and R. K. Sawyer (2001). Sociology and social theory in agent based social simulation: A symposium. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 7(3), 183-205.
13. David, N., J. S. Sichman, and H. Coelho (2003). Towards an emergence-driven software process for agent-based simulation. In J. Sichman, F. Bousquet, and P. Davidsson (Eds.), MABS 2002, Volume 2581 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 89-104. Berlin: Springer.
14. Doran, J. (1997). From computer simulation to artificial societies. SCS Transaction on Computer Simulation 14(2), 69-78.
15. Doran, J., N. Gilbert, U. Müller, and K. Troitzsch (Eds.) (1996). Object-Oriented and Agent-Oriented Simulation - Implications for Social Science Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Berlin: Springer.
16. Doran, J., M. Palmer, N. Gilbert, and P. Mellars (1994). The EOS project: Modeling upper paleolithic social change. In N. Gilbert and J. Doran (Eds.), Simulating Societies, pp. 195-223. London: UCL Press.
17. Edmonds, B. and M. Möhring (2005). Agent-based simulation modeling in social and organizational domains. Simulation 81(3), 173-174.
18. Ephrati, E., M. Pollack, and S. Ur (1995). Deriving multi-agent coordination through filtering strategies. In 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 679-687. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA.
19. Etzioni, O. (1993). Intelligence without robots: A reply to brooks. AI Magazine 14(4), 7-13.
20. Ewert, U. C., M. Röhl, and A. M. Uhrmacher (2003). What good are deliberative interventions in large scale disasters? Exploring the consequences of crisis management in pre-modern towns with agent-oriented simulation. In Agent Based Computational Demography. Berlin: Physica Verlag (Springer).
21. Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-Agent System: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Gierke, M., J. Himmelspach, M. Röhl, and A. Uhrmacher (2006). Modeling and simulation of tests for agents. In German Conference on Multi-Agent System Technologies MATES'06. LNCS Volume 4196, pp. 49-60. Heidelberg: Springer.
23. Gierke, M. and A. M. Uhrmacher (2005). Modeling elderly behavior for simulation-based testing on agent software. In Proceedings of the Conceptual Modeling and Simulation Conference (CMS 2005).San Diego, CA: SCS.
24. Gilbert, N. (2005). When does social simulation need cognitive models? In R. Sun (Ed.), Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Gilbert, N. and K. G. Troitzsch (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
26. Goldman, G. and J. Rosenschein (1994). Emergent coordination through the use of cooperative state-changing rules. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, pp. 432-437. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
27. Hanks, S., M. E. Pollack, and P. R. Cohen (1993). Benchmarks, test beds, controlled experimentation and the design of agent architectures. AAAI(Winter), 17-42.
28. Helbing, D. and K. Nagel (2004). The physics of traffic and regional development. Contemporary Physics 45(5), 405-426.
29. Helleboogh, A., G. Vizzari, A. Uhrmacher, and F. Michel (2007). Modeling dynamic environments in multi-agent simulation. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(1), 87-116.
30. Himmelspach, J. and A. M. Uhrmacher (2004). A component-based simulation layer for James. In PADS '04: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation, Kufstein, Austria, pp. 115-122. New York: IEEE Computer Society Press.
31. Huebsch, R., J. M. Hellerstein, N. Lanham, B. T. Loo, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica (2003). Querying the internet with pier. In VLDB, pp. 321-333.
32. Jennings, N. R., K. Sycara, and M. Wooldridge (1998). A roadmap of agent resarch and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1(1), 275-306.
33. Joseph, S. (2003). An extendible open source P2P simulator, P2P Journal, pp. 1-15.
34. Kinny, D. and M. Georgeff (1991). Commitment and effectiveness of situated agents. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference, pp. 82-88. IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA.
35. Kitano, H. and S. Tadokoro (2001). RoboCup rescue: A grand challenge for multiagent and intelligent systems. AI Magazine 22(1), 39-52.
36. Kitano, H., S. Tadokoro, H. Noda, I. Matsubara, T. Takhasi, A. Shinjou, and S. Shimada (1999). Robocup-rescue: Search and rescue for large scale disasters as a domain for multi-agent research. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Men, and Cybernetics.
37. Kitano, H., M. Tambe, P. Stone, M. Veloso, S. Coradeschi, E. Osawa, H. Matsubara, I. Noda, and M. Asada (1997). The RoboCup synthetic agent challenge 1997. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI'97. Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA.
38. Klein, M. (2003). DIANEmu: A java based generic simulation environment for distributed protocols. Technical Report 2003-7, University of Karlsruhe.
39. Klügl, F. and A. L. C. Bazzan (2004). Route decision behaviour in a commuting scenario: Simple heuristics adaptation and effect of traffic forecast. JASSS 7(1).
40. Knorr-Cetina, K. and A. Cicourel (Eds.) (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology-Toward an Integration ofMicro and Macro Sociologies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41. König-Ries, B., M. Klein, and T. Breyer (2004). Activity-based user modeling in wireless networks. Mobile Networks and Applications. Special Issue on Internet Wireless Access: 802.11 and Beyond.
42. Lees, M., B. Logan, R. Minson, T. Oguara, and G. Theodoropoulos (2005). Distributed simulation of MAS. In P. Davidson, B. Logan, and K. Takadama (Eds.), AAMAS 2004, Volume 3415 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 25-36. Berlin: Springer.
43. Low, M. Y. H., K. W. Lye, P. Lendermann, S. J. Turner, R. T. W. Chim, and S. H. Leo (2005). An agent-based approach for managing symbiotic simulation of semiconductor assembly and test operation. In AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, NY, pp. 85-92. ACM Press.
44. Luck, M., N. Griffiths, and M. d'Inverno (1997). From agent theory to agent construction: A case study. In J. Mueller, M. Wooldridge, and N. Jennings (Eds.), Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Volume 1193 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, London, pp. 49-63. Berlin: Springer.
45. Melo, F., R. Choren, R. Cerqueira, C. Lucena, and M. Blois (2004). Deploying agents with the CORBA component model. In W. Emmerich and A. Wolf (Eds.), CD 2004, Volume 3083 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 234-247. Berlin: Springer.
46. Minar, N., K. H. Kramer, and P. Maes (1999). Cooperating mobile agents for dynamic network routing. In A. L. G. Hayzelden and J. Bigham (Eds.), Software Agents for Future Communication Systems, pp. 287-304. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
47. Moro, G., S. Bergamaschi, and K. Aberer (Eds.) (2005). Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing, Volume 3601 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer.
48. Negnevitsky, M. (2002). Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley.
49. Odell, J. J. (2002). Objects and agents compared. Journal of Object Technology 1(1), 41-53.
50. O'Hare, G. M. P. and N. R. Jennings (Eds.) (1996). Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.
51. Parunak, H. V. D. (1997). "Go to the ant": Engineering principles from natural agent systems. Annals of Operation Research 75, 69-101.
52. Parunak, H. V. D. (1999). From chaos to commerce: Practical issues and research opportunities in the nonlinear dynamics of decentralized manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, pp. k15-k25.
53. Pew, R. W. and A. S. Mavor (Eds.) (1997). Representing Human Behavior in Military Simulations: Interim Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. Pew, R. W. and A. S. Mavor (Eds.) (1998). Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. Philips, A. and J. Bresina (1991). NASA TILEWORLD manual. Technical Report TR_FIA_91-04, MASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA.
56. Pollack, M. E., L. Brown, D. Colbry, C. E. McCarthy, C. Orosz, B. Peintner, S. Ramakrishnan, and I. Tsamardinos (2003). Autominder: An intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 44, 273-282.
57. Pollack, M. E. and M. Ringuette (1990). Introducing the TILEWORLD: Experimentally evaluating agent architectures. In AAAI-90, Boston, MA, pp. 183-189.
58. Pretschner, A., O. Slotosch, E. Aiglstorfer, and S. Kriebel (2004). Model-based testing for real-The inhouse card case study. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 5(2-3), 140-157.
59. Rao, A. S. and M. P. Georgeff (1995). BDI agents: Fromtheoryto practice. Technical Report 56, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute.
60. Rescue Technical Committee, T. R. (2000). RoboCup Rescue simulator manual. Ver. 0, Rev. 4.
61. Röhl, M. and A. M. Uhrmacher (2005). Controlled experimentation with agents-Models and implementations. In M.-P. Gleizes, A. Omicini, and F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Post-Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents World, Volume 3451 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 292-304. Berlin: Springer.
62. Russell, S. J. and P. Norvig (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
63. Shoham, Y. (1993). Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence 60, 51-92.
64. Silverman, B. G. (2003). Metrics and Methods in Human Performance Research toward Individual and Small Unit Simulation, Chapter 9 Human Performance Simulation. Washington, DC, Human Systems Information Analysis Center.
65. Sim, S. E., S. Easterbrook, and R. C. Holt (2003). Using benchmarking to advance research: A challenge to software engineering. In ICSE '03: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 74-83. IEEE Computer Society.
66. Tambe, M., J. Adibi, Y. Alonaizon, A. Erdem, G. Kaminka, S. Marsella, and I. Muslea (1999). Building agent teams using an explicit teamwork model and learning. Artificial Intelligence 110(2), 215-239.
67. Tanenbaum, A. S. and M. van Steen (2002). Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms.New York: Prentice-Hall.
68. Tobias, R. and C. Hofmann (2004). Evaluation of free java-libraries for social-scientific agent based simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(1).
69. Uhrmacher, A., P. Fishwick, and B. Zeigler (Eds.) (2001). Special Issue: Agents in Modeling and Simulation; Exploiting the Metaphor, Volume 89 of Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 127-213.
70. Uhrmacher, A. M. (1997). Concepts of object- and agent-oriented simulation. Transactions on SCS 14(2), 59-67.
71. Weiss, G. (Ed.) (2000). Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Weyns, D., A. Helleboogh, and T. Holvoet (2005a). The packet-world: A test bed for investigating situated multi-agent systems. In R. Unland, M. Klusch, and M. Calisti (Eds.), Software Agent-Based Applications, Platforms and Development Kits, Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technology.
73. Weyns, D., K. Schelfthout, T. Holvoet, and T. Lefever (2005b). Decentralized control of E'GV transportation systems. In Proceedings of AAMAS'05, pp. 67-74. ACM Press.
74. Wise, B. P., M. McDonald, L. M. Reuss, and J. Aronson (2001). Task order (TO) 69: ATM human behavior modeling approach study. Technical report, National Air and Space Administration (NASA), Arlington, VA. Technical Advance in Air Transportation Concepts and Technologies (AATT).
75. Wooldridge, M. (2000). Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Chapter Intelligent Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Wooldridge, M. (2002). An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Chichester, England: Wiley.
77. Wooldridge, M. and N. Jennings (1998). Pitfalls of agent-oriented development. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents-98), Minneapolis.
78. Wooldridge, M. and D. Vandekerckhove (1994). MyWorld: An agent-oriented testbed for distributed artificial intelligence. In S. Deen (Ed.), CKBS-93 Proceedings of the 1993 Special Interest Group on Cooperating Knowledge-Based Systems, Dake Centre, University of Keele, UK.
79. Yilmaz, L. and T. Ören (2005). Special issue on agent-directed simulation. Simulation 81 (7), 463-464.