Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: A case in the field of university-industry cooperation

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 118-134

  Feng, Feng ^a   Zhang, Leiyong ^a   Du, Yuneng ^b   Wang, Weiguang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b ANHUI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; CiteSpace; Quantitative; University industry collaboration; Visualizing

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; INFORMATION SERVICES; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CITESPACE; QUANTITATIVE; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; VISUALIZING;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84920370263     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: 18755879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agrawal A. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews 2001, 3:285-302.
2. Ahlgren P., Jarneving B., Rousseau R. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(6):550-560.
3. Albert R., Barabási A.L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 2002, 74(1):47.
4. Alice Lam Knowledge networks and careers: Academic scientists in industry-university links?. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44(6):993-1016.
5. Aurora A.C.T., Luisa M. A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university-industry links. Scientometrics 2012, 93:719-743.
6. Bensman S.J. Pearson's r and author cocitation analysis: A commentary on the controversy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(10):935.
7. Cao Z., Zhang L., Feng F., Du Y. Study on the characteristics and cultivating path of the industry-university symbiotic networks: Based on the small-world network model and the theory of symbiosis?. Asian Social Science 2013, 9(1):15-21.
8. Chen C. Mapping scientific frontiers 2003, Springer, London.
9. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101(Suppl.):5303-5310.
10. Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(3):359-377.
11. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35(1):128-152.
12. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 2002, 48(1):1-23.
13. D'Este P., Patel P. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry. Research Policy 2007, 36(9):1295-1313.
14. Diem A., Wolter S.C. The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education 2013, 54(1):86-114.
15. Etzkowitz H. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 2004, 1(1):64-77.
16. Etzkowitz H. The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action 2008, Routledge, London.
17. Etzkowitza H., Leydesdorffb L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 2000, 29(2):109-123.
18. Feng F., Zhang L., Du Y., Ma L., Fu M. Study on the classification and stability of industry-university-research symbiosis phenomenon: Based on the logistic model?. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences 2012, 3(1):116-120.
19. Goddard W., Dasgupta S. The materials and molecular simulation center of the Beckman Institute at Caltech - A model for university-industry-government research collaborations. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 1992, 204(16):79-80.
20. Geisler E., Rubenstein A.H. University-industry relations: A review of major issues. Cooperative research and development: The industry-university-government relationship 1989, 43-62. Springer, The Netherlands.
21. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies 1994, Sage, London.
22. Hou J., Hu Z. Review on the application of CiteSpace at home and abroad. Journal of Modern Information 2013, 33(4):99-103.
23. Hancock R.E., McCurry T.E. Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network: A new approach to university-industry relationships. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 1993, 16(4):306-313.
24. Jaffe A.B. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 1989, 79(5):957-970.
25. Jonas L., Göran T., Inger L., John S., Mats B. Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 2006, 69(3):575-589.
26. Kruskal J.B. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1956, 7(1):48-50.
27. Kruskal J.B., Wish M. Multidimensional scaling 1978, Vol. 11. Sage, London.
28. Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions 2012, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Kumar N. Industry-university symbiosis. International Journal of Engineering Education 1994, 10:127-132.
30. Lee Y.S. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 1996, 25(6):843-863.
31. Leydesdorffb L., Etzkowitza H. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Public and Science Policy 1996, 23(5):279-286.
32. Leydesdorff L., Vaughan L. Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(12):1616-1628.
33. Leydesdorff L., Zaal R. Co-words and citations relations between document sets and environments 1988, Elsevier.
34. Ma F., Xi M. Status and trends of bibliometric?. Journal of Information Science 1992, 13(5):7-17.
35. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 1991, 20(1):1-12.
36. Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 1998, 27(8):835-851.
37. McMillan H.E., Hamilton R.D. The impact of publicly funded basic research: An integrative extension of Martin and Salter. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2003, 50(2):184-191.
38. Miguel S., Moya-Anegón F., Herrero-Solana V. A new approach to institutional domain analysis: Multilevel research fronts structure. Scientometrics 2008, 74(3):331-344.
39. Mowery D.C., Sampat B.N. Universities in national innovation systems 2005, 209-239. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.
40. Nelson R. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis 1993, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
41. Nelson R.R. Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 2001, 26(1-2):13-19.
42. Perkmann M., Walsh K. University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 2007, 9(4):259-280.
43. Pickard R.H. Professional Service in universities technical colleges and industry. Nature 1944, 154(July-December):832.
44. Powell W.W., Grodal S. Networks of innovations 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, London.
45. Prim R.C. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell System Technical Journal 1957, 36(6):1389-1401.
46. Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation 1969, 25(4):348-349.
47. Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 1994, 23(3):323-348.
48. Shane S.A. Economic development through entrepreneurship: Government, university and business linkages 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
49. Siegel D.S., Waldman D., Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy 2003, 32:27-48.
50. Small H. Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(5):394-399.
51. Synnestvedt M.B., Chen C., Holmes J.H. CiteSpace II: Visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. AMIA annual symposium proceedings 2005, Vol. 2005:724. American Medical Informatics Association.
52. Thune T. University-industry collaboration: The network embeddedness approach?. Science and Public Policy 2007, 34(3):158-168.
53. Thursby J.G., Jensen R.A., Thursby M.C.A. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major us universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 2001, 26(1):59-72.
54. Waltman L., Eck N.J.V. Some comments on the question whether co-occurrence data should be normalized. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(11):1701-1703.
55. White H.D. Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics 1990, 84:106.
56. White H.D. Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(13):1250-1259.
57. White H.D., McCain K.W. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49(4):327-355.